The Texas Supreme Court is weighing whether to uphold a lower court's ruling that prevents the state from shutting down Annunciation House, a migrant shelter in El Paso, Texas. The attorney general's office argues that the shelter violates state law by helping undocumented immigrants, while Annunciation House maintains that its work is protected by the First Amendment. The case has drawn national attention and highlights the ongoing debate over immigration policies in the United States.
Bishop Mark Seitz spoke at a press conference in El Paso alongside Ruben Garcia, director of the Annunciation House, on February 23, 2024, regarding Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton 's effort to shut down an El Paso migrant shelter network he has accused of violating state law by helping undocumented migrants. The Annunciation House, related to its work with immigrants, opened its first shelter at a Catholic church nearly 50 years ago.
It primarily serves people who have been processed and released into the U.S. by federal immigration officials. The shelter's director, Ruben Garcia, communicates regularly with Border Patrol and other federal officials to help find shelter for immigrants who have nowhere else to go while their cases are processed. On February 7, officials from the attorney general’s Consumer Protection Division arrived at the migrant shelter’s door and demanded a trove of documents within a day. Annunciation House sued the attorney general’s office to delay the release of the records, asking a judge to determine which documents shelter officials were legally allowed to release. Paxton’s office filed a countersuit to shutter the shelter network. The attorney general’s office claimed the shelter was violating state law by helping people suspected of being undocumented immigrants. This investigation was one of more than 12 instances in which Paxton’s office used the state’s consumer protection laws to investigate organizations whose work conflicts in some way with his political views or the views of his conservative base. At least four other organizations that work with immigrants have been targeted.State District Judge Francisco Dominguez ruled that the state’s claim, “even if accepted as true, does not establish a violation of those provisions.” He also ruled that the state laws are preempted by federal law and therefore “unenforceable.” Paxton’s office appealed directly to the all-Republican Texas Supreme Court. The appeal drew five letters to the court from outside parties. Among them were two in support of Annunciation House filed by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a Texas nonprofit that champions religious freedom. America First Legal Foundation, an organization started by a former Trump administration official to advocate for conservative causes, also submitted a letter in support of Paxton’s office. Paxton’s office, which has argued that the shelter network should be closed for violating state laws against human smuggling and operating a stash house, told the court Monday that Annunciation House should be shuttered to send a message to other similar organizations. Ryan Baasch of the attorney general’s office argued that Annunciation House “knowingly and purposely” shelters undocumented persons. “If all the state is allowed to do is obtain an injunction that says, ‘Don’t do this unlawful act again,’ there’s absolutely no deterrent effect,” Baasch said in response to a question from a justice about why an injunction would be insufficient. When one of the justices asked whether the state wanted to deter organizations from exercising their religious activity, Baasch responded: “Not all, your honor. We want to deter organizations from knowingly and deliberately sheltering illegally present aliens.” Annunciation House’s lawyers have characterized the state’s arguments as “utter nonsense,” arguing that Paxton’s efforts violate the First Amendment, which guarantees the right to free speech, association and religion, and the Fourth Amendment, which offers protection against unreasonable search and seizure. On Monday, Annunciation House lawyer Amy Warr argued that most of the people who the shelter helps have been processed and released by federal immigration authorities while their cases are pending. She said other federal authorities, like the FBI, sometimes bring undocumented people to the shelter who they need as witnesses in criminal cases. “Law enforcement knows we are there, knows that we house undocumented people,” Warr said. “If they want to pick somebody up, they come with a warrant and they get the person — or they wait outside until the person comes out. They have full means to do this.” Annunciation House gave five minutes of its oral arguments to First Liberty Institute, a religious freedom organization. Elizabeth Kiernan argued on behalf of the group that Annunciation House’s work is motivated by the group’s Catholic faith. “The Catholic church has claimed Annunciation House as one of its own,” Kiernan said. “If the (Texas Religious Freedom and Restoration Act) protects anything, it protects this religious charity against outright closure.” It is not clear when the Supreme Court will rule on the case. If the justices side with Paxton’s office, the injunction prohibiting the state from issuing more subpoenas to Annunciation House could be canceled and the case would go back to the district court to hear the state’s argument for shutting down the shelter network. If they side with Annunciation House, the shelter network will be allowed to continue operating as it has
TEXAS SUPREME COURT MIGRANT SHELTER ANNUNCIATION HOUSE KEN PAXTON IMMIGRATION LAWS FIRST AMENDMENT RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Retiring Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht reflects on court he helped changeNathan Hecht won six reelections and led the court as chief justice for more than a decade. He retires now not because he’s had enough, but because state law…
Read more »
Texas Supreme Court dismisses State Bar lawsuit against assistant attorney generalThe state bar sought to take away the law license of Assistant Attorney General Brent Webster over a Texas lawsuit challenging 2020 presidential election results.
Read more »
Texas Supreme Court dismisses state bar's lawsuit against assistant A.G. Brent WebsterThe Texas Supreme Court dismissed a case against Assistant Attorney General Brent Webster that claimed professional misconduct when he was a named filer in a lawsuit challenging the 2020 election.
Read more »
Texas Supreme Court to Weigh Liability of Utility Companies in 2021 Winter StormThe Texas Supreme Court is set to decide whether families of those killed and injured during the 2021 winter storm can sue utility distributors for negligence. The case stems from power outages caused by the storm, with companies arguing they followed ERCOT's orders to shed load and prevent grid collapse. Plaintiffs argue that utility companies failed to implement promised rolling blackouts, leading to prolonged outages and fatalities.
Read more »
Texas Supreme Court to Weigh Utilities' Role in Deadly 2021 Winter StormThe Texas Supreme Court will hear arguments in a major case stemming from the devastating 2021 winter storm, considering whether over 15,000 plaintiffs can pursue claims against Texas utilities.
Read more »
Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht RetiresNathan Hecht, the longest-serving member of the Texas Supreme Court, is retiring after a long career in law. He reflects on his journey from a New Mexico farm to the state's highest civil court.
Read more »