+34
A federal judge ruled against a 2021 Texas law restricting state investments in companies boycotting fossil fuel industries, citing First and Fourteenth Amendment concerns and calling it facially overbroad. The ruling highlights issues with the law's definition of boycotting and its potential for discriminatory enforcement.
San Antonio’s oldest gay bar faces closure over lack of sprinklersProject Mission Creek has fixed and vaccinated 15 cats so farRead full article: Community rallies to safeguard stray cats months after kitten strangled at Southwest Side complexRead full article: Judson ISD school board proposes termination of superintendent during special meeting Airport leaders are finalizing design of new 3,000-space parking garage, ground transportation center A federal district judge on Wednesday declared a 2021 law restricting state investments in companies boycotting the fossil fuel industry unconstitutional, calling it “facially overbroad” and citing First and Fourteenth Amendment concerns.
they intended to make climate change initiatives a larger factor in their investment considerations. The law requires the comptroller’s office to maintain a list of financial firms that refuse, terminate or penalize business with a fossil fuel company “without ordinary business purpose.” SB 13 is commonly referred to as an “anti-ESG” law, which stands for “environmental, social and governance.”U.S. District Judge Alan Albright delivered the summary judgment, and affirmed in the 12-page order that the way SB 13 determined what constituted boycotting a company was too broad and undermined free speech protections of firms affected. “SB 13’s ‘boycotting’ definition is comprised of three clauses, all of which are undefined and not susceptible to objective measurement or determination,” Albright wrote in the ruling. Albright also wrote that the law had already led to “discriminatory enforcement” of its provisions. After SB 13 was passed, huge state investment funds, including the Teacher Retirement System of Texas and the Texas Permanent School Fund,of more than 300 companies they identified as boycotting energy companies, which was last updated in June. During that update, BlackRock, one of the largest international investment firms, wasfrom the list after it excused itself from two major climate initiatives. Then-state Comptroller Glenn Hegar lauded the move as a “meaningful victory” for Texas’ economy., alleging five different counts of free speech and due process violations. The ASBC subsequently moved for summary judgment on three of those claims in January 2025, and Albright ruled in their favor for all three Wednesday. In a statement, David Levine, ASBC president and co-founder, said SB 13 had already cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars and called the ruling a “massive win” for sustainable businesses. “The court has affirmed what we’ve always known: you cannot punish businesses for their investment decisions or silence those who speak about climate risk,” Levine said. The Texas Comptroller’s Office and Attorney General’s Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the ruling. Supporters of the suit praised the judge’s ruling as a win for state workers. Tim Hill, president of the Alliance for Prosperity and a Secure Retirement, called the ruling a victory for current and future retirees in the state. “Judge Albright’s thoughtful ruling will help keep politics out of public finance,” Hill said in a statement. “We are gratified that today’s ruling puts a stop to the unconstitutional effort in Texas to include non-fiduciary issues when deciding how to invest public pension funds.”Community rallies to safeguard stray cats months after kitten strangled at SW Side complexMeet ‘Easy Bake’— a July 4 flood survivor kitty who was found INSIDE an ovenArmy vet who battled brain cancer blocked twice from becoming SA firefighter over psychedelic useSpurs Jackals bring European-style fan energy to Frost Bank Center with support from WembyAdvocate shares how drivers can stay safe from road rage after 10-year-old girl shot on NW SideNorth Side neighbors upset about late night street repairsApartment resident worried for her safety after man accused of stabbing woman multiple timesVIA seeks to boost San Antonio bus service with more frequent routes, reduced wait timesWhat you need to know about Texas Education Freedom AccountsNortheast Side school delayed calling 911 after learning of possible gun on campusApplication portal for Texas Education Freedom Accounts opens Feb. 45-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos, father released from Texas immigration detention center
Scratch the next story
Texas Anti-ESG Fossil Fuels First Amendment Investment
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Galveston man sues California doctor under new Texas law allowing lawsuits over abortion pillsUnder House Bill 7, a private citizen who successfully sues an abortion pill provider can receive up to $100,000 from the defendant.
Read more »
Lawsuit accuses Bay Area doctor of violating Texas’ anti-abortion lawsJerry Rodriguez accused the doctor of violating Texas’ anti-abortion policies, testing a new law in the GOP-led state allowing private citizens to sue abortion pill providers for mailing the medica…
Read more »
Cleveland passes ‘Tanisha’s Law’; mental health crisis calls will change under the lawAnchor at News 5 Cleveland
Read more »
Judge blocks Texas law prohibiting state investment in anti-fossil fuel companiesA Texas law requiring state entities to sever ties with financial companies that 'boycott fossil fuels' has been blocked by a district judge.
Read more »
Texas law barring state investment in firms boycotting fossil fuels declared unconstitutionalA judge ruled Senate Bill 13, passed in 2021, violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The law prevented state investments in firms it deemed as boycotting oil and gas companies.
Read more »
WA's juvenile interrogation law faces scrutiny as teen homicides go unsolvedSeattle law enforcement and families of victims are questioning a Washington law.
Read more »