Tennessee lawmaker bizarrely defends the Three-Fifths Compromise as 'ending slavery'
that would ban the teaching of critical race theory in schools, which holds that U.S. institutions are inherently racist since they act to create racial inequity.
But basing his argument on a view that the Three-Fifths Compromise was enacted to restrict the power of southern states has no clear basis in fact. The compromise was agreed to as part of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, allowing for only three-fifths of the enslaved population to be counted for purposes of Congressional apportionment and Electoral College allocation.
It came at the insistence of southern slaveholders, who demanded significant representation as part of joining with largely free northern areas to form the early United States. Most historians agree the goal of the agreement was to uphold white supremacy in the South, with slaveholders gaining a disproportionate amount of power from the counting of large swaths of the population that did not have basic human rights or a right to vote."Do we talk about that? I don't hear that anywhere," Lafferty said of his view the Three-Fifths Compromise.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Tennessee Lawmaker Bizarrely Defends Three-Fifths Compromise As ‘Ending Slavery’Tennessee lawmaker bizarrely defends the Three-Fifths Compromise as 'ending slavery'
Read more »
GOP lawmaker: Three-Fifths Compromise was to end slaveryA Tennessee Republican falsely declared Tuesday that an 18th century policy designating a slave as three-fifths of a person was adopted for “the purpose of ending slavery,' commenting amid a debate over whether educators should be restricted while teaching about systematic racism in America. During lengthy debate on the GOP-controlled House floor, several Black lawmakers expressed concerns about the bill's impact on how certain subjects would be taught in schools, specifically highlighting the Three-Fifths Compromise. The policy was made during the nation’s Constitutional Convention in 1787 and classified that three-fifths of a state's slave population could be counted toward its total population when apportioning taxes and states’ representation in Congress.
Read more »
Tennessee lawmaker falsely suggests infamous 3/5ths compromise was to help end slaveryA Tennessee Republican lawmaker wrongly suggested on Tuesday that the infamous three-fifths compromise was an effort by Northern states to curtail the power of Southern slave-owning states with the ultimate aim of ending slavery, when in fact historians say it was the opposite, a dehumanizing concession that had the impact of giving more power to slave-owning states.
Read more »
EXPLAINER: No evidence '3/5 compromise' aimed to end slaveryWASHINGTON (AP) — It's a claim that has surfaced and been debunked before, but Republican lawmakers in recent days have given it new voice: the notion that the clause in the Constitution counting slaves as three-fifths of a person actually was a step toward ending slavery...
Read more »