Supreme Court won’t review North Carolina’s decision to nix license plates with Confederate flag

United States News News

Supreme Court won’t review North Carolina’s decision to nix license plates with Confederate flag
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 WashTimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 17 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 63%

The Supreme Court said Monday it won’t review North Carolina’s decision to stop issuing specialty license plates with the Confederate flag.

As is typical, the court did not comment in declining to hear the case, which challenged the state’s decision. The dispute was one of many the court said Monday it would not hear. It was similar to a case originating in Texas that the court heard in 2015, when it ruled the license plates are state property.

North Carolina offers three standard license plates and more than 200 specialty plates. Civic clubs including the Sons of Confederate Veterans can create specialty plates by meeting specific requirements. The state said it would consider alternate artwork for the plates’ design if it does not contain the Confederate flag.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

WashTimes /  🏆 235. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court can acknowledge affirmative action as reverse discriminationSupreme Court can acknowledge affirmative action as reverse discriminationThe dream of an America where all men and women were considered equal under the law has always been an unfinished masterpiece.
Read more »

Republicans set to lose multiple seats due to Supreme Court rulingRepublicans set to lose multiple seats due to Supreme Court rulingNAACP president Derrick Johnson welcomed the Supreme Court's decision as a 'triumph for our democracy.'
Read more »

Why the Supreme Court Declined an Opportunity to Diminish the Voting Rights ActWhy the Supreme Court Declined an Opportunity to Diminish the Voting Rights ActIn a new Q. & A., IChotiner speaks with ruthgreenwood about the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Allen v. Milligan, which determined that Alabama’s redistricting had illegally diluted the power of Black voters.
Read more »

Supreme Court endorses race-based districtingSupreme Court endorses race-based districtingChief Justice John Roberts famously wrote in a 2006 political redistricting case that “it is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.” In a landmark redistricting decision on June 8, Roberts engaged in exactly this sordid business.
Read more »

US Supreme Court Kicks American Wetlands When They're DownIt appears the Court's right-wing majority wants to open the floodgates to polluters even as we continue to learn more about just how connected wetlands are to bigger bodies of water and also to our entire way of life​.
Read more »

Supreme Court Voting Rights Decision an Important, If Qualified, WinWhile Allen v. Milligan should be celebrated as a victory for fair representation, it cannot be an excuse for congressional inaction.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-21 23:21:20