Supreme Court won’t hear case seeking more transparency from secretive surveillance court

United States News News

Supreme Court won’t hear case seeking more transparency from secretive surveillance court
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 41 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 72%

Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Sonia Sotomayor said the case should have been reviewed.

in 2013 showed widespread, bulk collection of phone calls and emails, Congress in 2015 required the government to review any significant opinions for public release.But the ACLU argued that such reviews are conducted by executive-branch officials, not a court, and that the government believes release of opinions before June 2015 is not required, although it has released several.

Besides other free-speech advocates, the ACLU’s challenge was supported by news organizations, including The Washington Post, and some former high-level national security experts. One group included former director of national intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., former CIA director John Brennan, and Donald B. Verrilli Jr., who was solicitor general under President Barack Obama.

Their brief said it is not enough for the executive branch to decide which opinions may be released, and that there is no reason the public cannot see properly redacted versions of the court’s actions.“The basic, longstanding premise of public access to judicial opinions does not cease to apply merely because the judicial opinions of the FISC relate to surveillance, intelligence, and national security,” they wrote.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

washingtonpost /  🏆 95. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Justices Appear Open To Allowing Challenges To Texas Abortion LawSupreme Court Justices Appear Open To Allowing Challenges To Texas Abortion LawJustices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett asked some telling questions about the law's unusual structure.
Read more »

Supreme Court justices, including Barrett and Kavanaugh, sound skeptical of Texas abortion lawSupreme Court justices, including Barrett and Kavanaugh, sound skeptical of Texas abortion lawAfter hearing arguments, Supreme Court appears ready to reverse course and allow abortion providers to sue and block Texas' abortion law. Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett M. Kavanaugh, who hold key votes, said the state appeared to have gone too far:
Read more »

Supreme Court justices wary of Texas abortion ban enforcement schemeSupreme Court justices wary of Texas abortion ban enforcement schemeA majority of justices, during the more than three hours of oral arguments on Monday, signaled that Texas abortion providers have a strong case for asking federal courts to put SB8 on hold.
Read more »

The Supreme Court Case That Created the ‘Dreamer’ NarrativeThe Supreme Court Case That Created the ‘Dreamer’ NarrativeFor more than 20 years, undocumented youth have been the poster children of immigration reform. Now, they are questioning the narratives that got them here in the first place — and whom they left behind.
Read more »

Supreme Court to hear case on New York's gun permit lawSupreme Court to hear case on New York's gun permit lawWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is preparing to hear a gun rights case that could lead to more guns on the streets of New York and Los Angeles and threaten restrictions on guns in subways, airports, bars, churches, schools and other places where people gather.
Read more »

Puerto Rico media petitions Supreme Court in abuse casePuerto Rico media petitions Supreme Court in abuse caseThe Association of Puerto Rico Journalists is seeking access to recordings of court proceedings involving a woman who was killed by her former boyfriend and has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its case against the U.S. territory’s government.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-25 05:16:23