Supreme Court to decide if ban on homeless encampments is 'cruel and unusual'

Is Being Homeless Illegal News

Supreme Court to decide if ban on homeless encampments is 'cruel and unusual'
Us Supreme CourtSupreme CourtHomeless
  • 📰 ABC7Chicago
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 36 sec. here
  • 15 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 63%
  • Publisher: 63%

The justices heard arguments Monday on whether ticketing people who live on the streets is 'cruel and unusual' and violates the 8th Amendment.

The justices will hear arguments Monday on whether ticketing people who live on the streets is cruel and unusual, and violates the 8th Amendment.The Supreme Court wrestled Monday for more than two and a half hours with the question of whether ticketing homeless people is a "cruel and unusual" punishment that violates the Eighth Amendment.

Much of the argument focused on whether the "anti-camping" ordinances in Grants Pass, Oregon, prohibited conduct, such as sleeping with bedding in a public space, or the status of being homeless. The city of 38,000 argues that the rules are focused narrowly on conduct but the plaintiffs have argued that enforcement has been targeted at people who are unhoused.

Chief Justice John Roberts and other members of the court's conservative majority raised a series of questions that noted the ordinance doesn't explicitly say anything about prohibiting homelessness - and that defining someone's status as "homeless" can be tricky because it can change nightly.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

ABC7Chicago /  🏆 284. in US

Us Supreme Court Supreme Court Homeless Supreme Court Homeless Camps Homelessness Homeless People Homeless Housing California Homeless Supreme Court Homeless Homelss In California Los Angeles Homeless La Homeless Unhoused

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Justice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationJustice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is absent from the court Monday with no explanation.
Read more »

Justice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationJustice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is absent from the court Monday with no explanation.
Read more »

Clarence Thomas absent from Supreme Court Monday, no reason givenClarence Thomas absent from Supreme Court Monday, no reason givenSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was missing from oral arguments on Monday without an explanation from the court.
Read more »

Justice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationJustice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationWASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was absent from the court Monday with no explanation. Thomas, 75, also was not participating
Read more »

Justice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationJustice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is absent from the court Monday with no explanation. The 75-year-old Thomas also is not participating remotely in arguments, as justices sometimes do when they are ill or otherwise can’t be there in person.
Read more »

Former Supreme Court Justice Breyer aims to return as visiting judge on federal appeals courtFormer Supreme Court Justice Breyer aims to return as visiting judge on federal appeals courtFormer Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer is planning to serve as a visiting judge on the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston. Breyer, who retired in 2022, expressed his interest in a podcast and the appeals court confirmed his plans.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-15 11:18:26