A unanimous Supreme Court has ruled public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media, an issue that first arose for the high…
A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Friday that public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media, an issue that first arose for the high court in a case involving then-President Donald Trump.
The court ruled in two cases involving lawsuits filed by people who were blocked after leaving critical comments on social media accounts belonging to school board members in Southern California and a city manager in Port Huron, Michigan, northeast of Detroit. They are similar to a case involving Trump and his decision to block critics from his personal account on Twitter, now known as X. The justices dismissed the case after Trump left office in January 2021.
One case involved two elected members of a California school board, the Poway Unified School District Board of Trustees. The members, Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane, used their personal Facebook and Twitter accounts to communicate with the public. Two parents, Christopher and Kimberly Garnier, left critical comments and replies to posts on the board members’ accounts and were blocked. The 9th U.S.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rules on social media case involving Poway unified officialsThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday that public officials can face legal action for blocking social media users on their pages, a decision partially stemming from a case in which two Poway Unified School Board trustees blocked a pair of parents over frequent, critical social media comments.
Read more »
Poway Unified facing $28 million budget shortfall, will avoid layoffsJeff Lasky is an award-seeking journalist and the ultimate 'utility player' for ABC 10News in San Diego.
Read more »
Supreme Court sets rules on when public officials can block social media usersThe Supreme Court laid out a new test for determining when actions taken by government employees on social media constitute official business verses personal conduct.
Read more »
Supreme Court sets rules on when public officials can block social media usersThe First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech, generally prohibits government employees from censoring public comments or blocking access to a social media account that offers official communications.
Read more »
Supreme Court sets rules for public officials who want to block social media criticsIf a public employee has the “actual authority to speak on the state’s behalf” and “purported to exercise that authority” on social media, then the official can be liable for blocking or deleting critical commentators, the opinion said.
Read more »
Live updates: Supreme Court considers the future of social mediaThe Supreme Court on Monday will hear oral arguments in a pair of cases that could transform how social networks have operated for decades.
Read more »