The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Brenda Andrew, a death row inmate in Oklahoma, allowing her to challenge her conviction for the murder of her estranged husband. The court found that prosecutors inappropriately focused on Andrew's sex life during her trial, potentially violating her due process rights. This ruling, which reversed a lower court decision, opens the door for Andrew to pursue a new trial.
The Supreme Court issued a rare ruling in favor of a death row inmate on Tuesday, finding that an Oklahoma woman convicted of murdering her estranged husband can pursue a claim that prosecutors inappropriately focused on her sex life at trial. The court, divided 7-2, opened the door for Brenda Andrew to challenge her conviction and death sentence. She is the only woman on death row in Oklahoma .
The court ruled that an appeals court was wrong to conclude that Andrew's claim that her due process rights were violated by the focus on her personal life, including treatment of her children, could not move forward. The right to due process under the Constitution's 14th Amendment 'forbids the introduction of evidence so unduly prejudicial as to render a criminal trial fundamentally unfair,' the Supreme Court said in an unsigned opinion. The case will now return to lower federal courts for further litigation on Andrew's habeas corpus claim. Andrew was convicted in state court of the 2001 murder of husband Rob, who was shot twice with a shotgun in the garage of their former family home in Oklahoma City when he came to pick up their two children. Her alleged accomplice, boyfriend James Pavatt, was also prosecuted and is currently on death row. Andrew, now 61, was herself shot in the arm during the incident. Andrew's conviction was upheld in state court, prompting her to file a habeas corpus claim in federal court, which was also rejected. Andrew's lawyers say prosecutors focused on her personal life because they lacked concrete evidence connecting her to the crime Among the issues raised at trial were that Andrew previously had affairs with other men, that she dressed provocatively, and that she had made sexual advances towards two young men working in her yard. Toward the end of the trial, a prosecutor held up thong underwear owned by Andrew and asked the jury if a 'grieving widow' would wear such an item of clothing. The prosecutor also used the term 'slut puppy' to refer to Andrew, her lawyers said, although the state says the comment was not a direct reference to her. The prosecutors' case 'fixated on obtaining a conviction and death sentence by denigrating her character as a woman,' her lawyers said in court papers. Two conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, disagreed with Tuesday's ruling. Thomas wrote in a dissenting opinion that the court had not followed its own rules in determining whether a habeas corpus claim arising from a prosecution in state courts can move forward. Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond said in court papers that there was 'overwhelming evidence that Andrew and Pavatt plotted the murder' in order to access a life insurance payout. Andrew, he added, had a 'visceral hatred' of her husband, and evidence of her 'ability to get men ... to do her bidding' was relevant to the case
SUPREME COURT DEATH ROW OKLAHOMA BREDA ANDREW DUE PROCESS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT HABEAS CORPUS MURDER TRIAL
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court grants a new hearing for the only woman on Oklahoma's death rowThe Supreme Court has ordered lower courts to review the case of the only woman on Oklahoma’s death row
Read more »
Supreme Court Orders Review of Oklahoma Death Row Woman's CaseThe Supreme Court has ordered lower courts to review the case of Brenda Andrew, the only woman on Oklahoma's death row, over concerns that the prosecution's discussion of her sexual history prejudiced her trial for the murder of her estranged husband.
Read more »
Retiring Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht reflects on court he helped changeNathan Hecht won six reelections and led the court as chief justice for more than a decade. He retires now not because he’s had enough, but because state law…
Read more »
North Carolina Supreme Court Election Dispute Heads Back to State CourtA federal judge has sent a legal battle over a North Carolina Supreme Court election back to the state's highest court, where it has been blocked. The dispute centers around the election between Democratic Associate Justice Allison Riggs and GOP challenger Jefferson Griffin.
Read more »
Trump asks the Supreme Court to block NY court from sentencing him on FridayRooted in fact-based, transparent reporting, Newsy is an award-winning opinion-free network owned by the E.W. Scripps Company that is relentlessly focused on “the why” of every story and seeks to enable a more intimate and immersive understanding of the issues that matter.
Read more »
Supreme Court to weigh reinstating Obamacare care requirements struck down by lower courtThe Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider some reinstating preventative care coverage requirements under the Affordable Care Act that were struck down by a lower court.
Read more »