The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ali Hemani, a Texas man charged with unlawful possession of a gun since he admitted that he regularly smoked marijuana.
The Supreme Court sided Thursday with a Texas marijuana user who wants to legally own a gun, the latest in a line of firearm cases from a court that has expanded gun rights.
In a unanimous decision, the justices ruled in favor of Ali Danial Hemani, who argued that a law barring guns from anyone who uses drugs illegally violates the Second Amendment. Hemani wasn't charged with any other crimes or accused of using the weapon under the influence. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion, saying the ruling limits but doesn't end the government's power to take guns from drug users.
The decision is a loss for President Donald Trump's Republican administration, which had defended the 1968 law despite arguing against other gun restrictions. The measure was also used in a case against Hunter Biden, who was convicted in Wilmington, Delaware, of buying a gun while addicted to cocaine in 2018. He was later pardoned by his father, then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat. Someone addicted to a drug could still be prosecuted after Thursday's decision, Gorsuch wrote.
"We do not address efforts to ban addicts, or those presently intoxicated, from possessing a firearm," he wrote. Prosecutors could potentially still charge a marijuana user, if they had evidence the person was dangerous. It's the latest in a series of firearm cases to reach the Supreme Court since a landmark ruling expanding gun rights in 2022 led to a wave of challenges around the country.
Since then, the high court has upheld a law aimed at protecting victims of domestic violence and strict regulations on ghost gun kits but has struck down a ban on bump stocks, an accessory that enables rapid fire. The justices are also considering a second firearm case this term over strict regulations on carrying guns in Hawaii. The Texas case comes after significant shifts in the legality and use of cannabis.
More than half of U.S. states have now legalized it broadly, and it's gained widespread use for health purposes.
"Whatever one thinks of these developments, the federal government has not just tolerated them; it helped fuel them," Gorsuch wrote. "All of which leaves it awkwardly positioned to suggest that the millions of Americans who now regularly use marijuana are categorically and unusually dangerous. " Recreational use remains illegal on a federal level even after the Trump administration reclassified medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug in April.
It's rare to see standalone criminal charges filed against people accused solely of owning guns and using drugs. The charge is more often filed against people also accused of other crimes. The case made for some unusual political alliances. The American Civil Liberties Union and the National Rifle Association both supported Hemani's case, as did cannabis legalization groups like NORML.
On the other side were gun safety groups like Everytown that usually oppose the Trump administration on Second Amendment issues.2 Bay Area college students dead after being swept into ocean at Santa Cruz Co. beachSF Giants players draw backlash after writing Bible verses on Pride Night caps
Please follow us on Google to support us United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
How Supreme Court move could upend indefinite ICE detentionsNewsweek spoke to six experts after the Supreme Court agreed to hear a major challenge to prolonged ICE detention.
Read more »
Major Labels Ask Supreme Court to Overturn Landmark Copyright Termination RulingUniversal Music Group, Warner Music Group, Sony Music, and BMG have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a Fifth Circuit decision that would allow songwriters to terminate copyrights and reclaim foreign rights, arguing it contradicts statutory text and threatens global licensing stability.
Read more »
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Skill Games are IllegalThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned two lower court cases concerning “skill” based slot machines on Monday.
Read more »
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rebukes Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner for Misleading Courts, Withholding EvidenceThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ordered the state attorney general to review future convictions sought to be reversed by Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, citing repeated instances of misleading courts and withholding evidence. The court found a pattern of misconduct in multiple cases,with Krasner's office seeking to toss convictions for personal or political reasons. This unprecedented move highlights the seriousness of the issues at hand and the lack of trust in Krasner's ofFice.
Read more »