Supreme Court justices cautious about limiting government's communication with social media companies

Law News

Supreme Court justices cautious about limiting government's communication with social media companies
Supreme CourtGovernmentSocial Media Companies
  • 📰 verge
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 59 sec. here
  • 16 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 76%
  • Publisher: 67%

During oral arguments on Monday, both liberal and conservative justices on the Supreme Court appeared wary of imposing broad limits on how the government can communicate with social media companies about problematic content it thinks should be removed. The case at issue is called Murthy v. Missouri, and it asks the court to determine whether the Biden administration’s communications with platforms coerced the companies to take down content, like misinformation about covid vaccines, thereby violating the First Amendment.

During oral arguments on Monday, both liberal and conservative justices on the Supreme Court appeared wary of imposing broad limits on how the government can communicate with social media companies about problematic content it thinks should be removed. The case at issue is called Murthy v.

Missouri, and it asks the court to determine whether the Biden administration’s communications with platforms coerced the companies to take down content, like misinformation about covid vaccines, thereby violating the First Amendment. It also asks the court to consider whether the government’s encouragement to take down such posts actually transformed the platforms themselves into state actors. But several justices seemed skeptical of the arguments from Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin Aguiñaga, who argued on behalf of the states and individual plaintiffs who challenged the Biden administration on its communications with social media companies. The justices appeared to worry about the far-reaching consequences of limiting the ways the government is able to speak with tech platforms. In the case originally filed in May 2022, the attorneys general for Louisiana and Missouri accused the Biden administration of coercing platforms to censor viewpoints they disagreed with. They had secured wins from the lower courts, which issued and upheld an injunction on the government’s communications with platforms, though the appeals court narrowed its scop

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

verge /  🏆 94. in US

Supreme Court Government Social Media Companies Communication Problematic Content First Amendment Murthy V. Missouri Biden Administration Misinformation Covid Vaccines State Actors Louisiana Solicitor General Arguments Injunction

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court decision on Trump's Colorado ballot case could come MondaySupreme Court decision on Trump's Colorado ballot case could come MondayThis is additional taxonomy that helps us with analytics
Read more »

Supreme Court Could Decide Monday If Trump Can Be Kicked Off State BallotsSupreme Court Could Decide Monday If Trump Can Be Kicked Off State BallotsThe resolution of the case would remove uncertainty about whether votes for Trump will count.
Read more »

Supreme Court to release decisions Monday, with Trump Colorado ruling a strong possibilitySupreme Court to release decisions Monday, with Trump Colorado ruling a strong possibilityLawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Read more »

Supreme Court’s Trump ballot ruling could come MondaySupreme Court’s Trump ballot ruling could come MondayThe Supreme Court could decide whether Trump is eligible to run for office in Colorado on Monday after it released an unusual announcement.
Read more »

Supreme Court ruling may happen as soon as Monday over Trump ballot eligibilitySupreme Court ruling may happen as soon as Monday over Trump ballot eligibilityA Supreme Court decision could come as soon as Monday in the case about whether former President Donald Trump can be kicked off the ballot.
Read more »

Supreme Court order on Texas’ SB4 law expires MondaySupreme Court order on Texas’ SB4 law expires MondayThe United States Supreme Court is expected to weigh in on a Texas law that would give police authority to arrest people suspected of crossing the border illegally. The law is on pause right now.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-14 21:12:26