An analysis of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's behavior during oral arguments concerning Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming drugs for minors highlights his disregard for established legal procedures.
I am still enough of an institutionalist that it pains me to hear Supreme Court justices embarrassing themselves on the bench. So as I listened to Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito engaging with Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar during oral argument in the case challenging Tennessee’s ban on the provision of gender-affirming drugs for minors earlier this month, I couldn’t help but cringe.
Shuffling through papers that he suggested were studies from various European countries that urged caution in the provision of puberty blockers to teens, Alito engaged in a “gotcha” line of questioning, insisting that Prelogar—the meticulous and unmatched litigator who has masterfully led the solicitor general’s office under President Joe Biden—had somehow misled the court about the accumulated scientific consensus on the effectiveness of puberty blockers for teens experiencing gender dysmorphia. His derisive tone and relentless questioning were typical for Alito and not what concerned me. It was instead the contempt that Alito showed for the rules that govern the boundaries of litigation in our system. None of the studies he referenced as the basis of his questions to Prelogar had been part of the record in the case. None had been presented before the judge who tried the case. Justice Alito appeared to have, as the saying goes, “done his own research,” which he was now injecting into the case. And it is not difficult for a civil rights lawyer to criticize the conservative-controlled court’s aggressive and transparent efforts to erase the legacy of the Warren court’s jurisprudence. What has received too little attention is how this court’s headlong rush toward achieving its ideological aims is undermining the rules that govern our system of litigation in its wake.was a case in poin
Supreme Court Samuel Alito Legal Norms Litigation Gender Identity
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Mississippi Runoff Elections: Voters Choose Supreme Court Justice and Court of Appeals JudgeVoters in Mississippi will decide on a state Supreme Court justice and a Court of Appeals judge in runoff elections closing at 7 p.m. today. The Jackson Metro area and central Mississippi see incumbent Justice Jim Kitchens facing state Sen. Jenifer Branning, while the Gulf Coast region has a contest between Jennifer Schloegel and Amy St. Pé.
Read more »
Alito and Thomas Have Already Taken the Most-Contradictory Positions of the Supreme Court TermAlito and Thomas were correct about one thing.
Read more »
‘We enjoy this sometimes’: The rhetorical battle between Justices Alito and Kagan at the Supreme CourtAlito and Kagan are sharp-tongued strategic questioners and both keenly aware of which other justices might be in play – open to persuasion – during arguments in a case
Read more »
Supreme Court justice compares child sex change ban to Jim Crow interracial marriage lawThe comment came as the high court weighs the legality of a Tennessee law that bans gender procedures for children.
Read more »
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson set to make Broadway debutThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments out of Tennessee for challenges to transgender healthcare for minors, with potentially widespread impacts depending on the outcome of the eventual ruling. MSNBC political analyst and co-host of the “SistersInLaw” podcast, Kimberly Atkins Stohr, discusses these impacts and her worries on the subject.
Read more »
Supreme Court justice sparks social media fire storm for her comments on gender transitions for minorsA Supreme Court Justice triggered backlash after she compared the case weighing in on states banning gender transitions for minors to past state laws of banning interracial marriage
Read more »