Supreme Court just shriveled protection for wetlands, leaving many of these valuable ecosystems at risk | Opinion

United States News News

Supreme Court just shriveled protection for wetlands, leaving many of these valuable ecosystems at risk | Opinion
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 PennLive
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 41 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 53%

For the last 45 years the EPA and the Corps have required discharge permits in wetlands “adjacent” to water bodies, even if a dune, levee or other barrier separated the two. The Sackett decision upends that approach.

The Sackett decision and its ramifications

None of the nine justices adopted Kennedy’s 2006 “significant nexus” standard. However, Justice Brett Kavanaugh and the three liberal justices disagreed with the majority’s “continuous surface connection” test. That test, Kavanaugh, is inconsistent with the text of the Clean Water Act, which extends coverage to “adjacent” wetlands – including those that are near or close to larger water bodies.

The majority’s ruling leaves little room for the EPA or the Army Corps of Engineers to issue new regulations that could protect wetlands more broadly. Congress could amend the Clean Water Act to expressly provide that “waters of the United States” includes wetlands that the court has now stripped of federal protection. However,, and today’s closely divided Congress is unlikely to fare any better.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

PennLive /  🏆 463. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

The Urgent Warning That Got Cut From a Supreme Court Opinion 20 Years AgoThe Urgent Warning That Got Cut From a Supreme Court Opinion 20 Years AgoThis just discovered note was eerily prescient about today's 'plutocracy,' but the justice agreed to delete his warning in exchange for a vote.
Read more »

Opinion: The Supreme Court was enabling corruption well before the Clarence Thomas scandalOpinion: The Supreme Court was enabling corruption well before the Clarence Thomas scandalJohn Roberts' court has undone campaign finance safeguards and overturned convictions of public officials for years, most recently that of a onetime aide to Andrew Cuomo.
Read more »

Gorsuch serves as conscience of the U.S. Supreme CourtGorsuch serves as conscience of the U.S. Supreme CourtThe United States Supreme Court last week tersely dismissed an immigration-related case, known as Arizona v. Mayorkas, because the matter was moot.
Read more »

Supreme Court “Sackett” Decision Shrinks Protections for US WetlandsSupreme Court “Sackett” Decision Shrinks Protections for US WetlandsThis narrow interpretation of the Clean Water Act limits what qualifies as 'waters of the United States.'
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-22 06:17:10