At issue was the 2017 arrest in Texas of a journalist who published news stories about a border agent's public suicide and a car crash.
At issue was the 2017 arrest in Texas of a journalist who published news stories about a border agent's public suicide and a car crash.The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a case testing a Texas law allowing law enforcement to arrest reporters who obtain information from government employees.
"This case implicates one of the most basic journalistic practices of them all: asking sources within the government for information. Each day, countless journalists follow this practice, seeking comment, confirmation, or even 'scoops' from governmental sources," she wrote."Reasonably so." In 2017, Laredo, Texas, journalist Priscilla Villarreal, also known as"LaGordiLoca." was arrested for publishing news stories about a border agent's public suicide and a car crash. She was arrested because she fact-checked her stories with information voluntarily provided by a police officer."This was a blatant First Amendment violation," Sotomayor wrote in her dissent."No reasonable officer would have thought that he could have arrested Villarreal, consistent with the Constitution, for asking the questions she asked. Such an arrest is plainly inconsistent with basic First Amendment principles." The Texas law had never been enforced before Villarreal's case. The law makes it a felony to solicit from public officials information that has not previously been publicly disclosed. After a Texas court judge held that the statute was unconstitutionally vague, Villarreal sued both the prosecutors and police officers responsible for her arrest. When law enforcement officers appealed, a panel of three Fifth Circuit federal appeals court judges ruled for Villarreal,:"If the First Amendment means anything, it surely means that a citizen journalist has the right to ask a public official a question, without fear of being imprisoned. Yet that is exactly what happened here: Priscilla Villarreal was put in jail for asking a police officer a question. If that is not an obvious violation of the Constitution, it's hard to imagine what would be." But the full Fifth Circuit subsequently held 9-7 that the officials have qualified immunity for arresting Villarreal since she did speak to a government official and benefited through"minor advertising revenue" and"free meals from appreciative readers." More importantly, the full court concluded that the officials are entitled to qualified immunity from being sued because they could have reasonably thought they were just enforcing the law.The Supreme Court first weighed in on Villarreal's case last year when it ordered the Fifth Circuit to reconsider the case in light of other cases which support Villarreal's position. But the Fifth Circuit, widely viewed as the most conservative federal appeals court in the country, again ruled against Villarreal."The Court's intervention is warranted because the Fifth Circuit's position undermines important bedrock constitutional protections," Sotomayor wrote in her dissent."Under its view, police officers may arrest journalists for core First Amendment activity so long as they can point to a statute that the activity violated and that no high state court had previously invalidated, whether facially or as applied. This rule creates a perverse scheme in which officials can arrest someone for protected activity, decline to appeal a trial court's decision declaring the statute unconstitutional , and use qualified immunity to avoid liability by citing back to that statute."
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
James Comey Subpoenaed by DOJ in Connection to 2017 Russian Election Interference AssessmentFormer FBI Director James Comey has been subpoenaed by the Department of Justice regarding his involvement in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian election interference. The investigation reportedly involves evaluating possible wrongdoing related to the assessment's creation and potential false statements to Congress. The subpoena is also linked to an ongoing probe into former CIA Director John Brennan. This comes after the ICA, which concluded Russia sought to influence the 2016 election, was later found to have 'procedural anomalies'. Comey previously supervised a probe into Russia-Trump campaign collusion and was fired by Trump in 2017.
Read more »
Supreme Court rejects citizen journalist's case against Texas officials who arrested her for reportingLawrence Hurley is a senior Supreme Court reporter for NBC News.
Read more »
Supreme Court rejects appeal of Texas journalist Priscilla VillarrealThe Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of a Texas-based online citizen journalist who said she was wrongly arrested in a case that drew attention from national media organizations and free speech advocates.
Read more »
Supreme Court denies Rodney Reed's appeal for DNA testing in Texas caseThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from longtime Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed who has sought to test crime-scene evidence that he says will help clear him. The justices on Monday left in place a ruling against Reed from the federal appeals court in New Orleans for the second time in less than three years.
Read more »
Supreme Court rejects appeal from Texas death row inmate Rodney ReedThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from longtime Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed who has sought to test crime-scene evidence that he says will help clear him.
Read more »
Supreme Court rejects appeal from online citizen journalist over her arrest in TexasThe Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of a Texas-based online citizen journalist who said she was wrongly arrested in a case that drew attention from national media organizations and free speech advocates.
Read more »