Supreme Court declines to hear case from St. Louis couple that pointed guns at BLM protest

United States News News

Supreme Court declines to hear case from St. Louis couple that pointed guns at BLM protest
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 axios
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 17 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 63%

NEW: The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the St. Louis couple who pointed guns at Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020.

The court stayed the suspension on the condition they serve a year's probation.to the Supreme Court, the couple argued that the court violated their Second Amendment rights and denied them their rights under the due process clause of the Constitution.

They argued they were "exercising lawful rights to bear arms in defense of their person, family, and home."They had pleaded guilty in June 2021 to one count of fourth-degree assault after pointing guns at anti-racism protesters outside of their home in St. Louis, but they were later pardoned by Missouri's governor.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

axios /  🏆 302. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Opinion | There's something weird going down at the Supreme Court this termOpinion | There's something weird going down at the Supreme Court this term.steve_vladeck: The Supreme Court is handing down its fewest decisions in decades. Here's what that means.
Read more »

Guns, Religion, Immigration and Abortion: What’s Ahead as Supreme Court Nears Session’s EndGuns, Religion, Immigration and Abortion: What’s Ahead as Supreme Court Nears Session’s EndThe Supreme Court is expected to issue at least one opinion on Monday as it closes out one of its most contentious sessions in recent years. Here are 10 of the most important cases awaiting opinions:
Read more »

Wicker says leak could harm Supreme Court, but scoffs at Clarence Thomas' possible conflicts of interestWicker says leak could harm Supreme Court, but scoffs at Clarence Thomas' possible conflicts of interestSen. Roger Wicker says Justice Clarence Thomas’ possible conflicts of interest do nothing to hurt the U.S. Supreme Court.
Read more »

As my case heads to the Supreme Court, I am choosing to embrace a legacy of freedomAs my case heads to the Supreme Court, I am choosing to embrace a legacy of freedomThere’s a human cost when the government fails to protect freedom. It’s a cost I’m familiar with. For almost six years now, I’ve been in court with officials from my home state of Colorado who are trying to take away my freedom of speech and force me to say something I don’t believe.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-23 23:01:56