The Supreme Court's action dashes the hopes of American Samoans seeking birthright citizenship — and leaves intact a decision that breathed new life into distinctions between U.S. states and territories.
," a series of cases decided in the early 1900s that are infamous today for their racist foundation. The court's action dashes hopes of American Samoans who were seeking birthright citizenship. It also leaves intact a Tenth Circuit decision that has been seen as"breathing new life" into constitutional distinctions between U.
S. states and territories — which former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal said establish"a second-class of unequal Americans." Attorney Neil Weare, president of the organization representing the plaintiffs in this case, echoed the sentiment:"The Supreme Court's refusal to reconsider thetoday ... reflect[s] that 'Equal Justice Under Law' does not mean the same thing for the 3.6 million residents of U.S. territories as it does for everyone else."At issue in this case was the way that people born in various U.S. territories are treated under law when it comes to U.S. citizenship. The Constitution says that anyone"born or naturalized in the United States" is a citizen of the country. But for U.S. territories, eligibility for birthright citizenship in the territories is controlled only by Congress – it is not constitutionally guaranteed.deemed U.S. citizens under the Immigration and Nationality Act. But American Samoans are not. Congress has not granted birthright citizenship to residents of American Samoa or Swains Island, both of which are classified only as"outlying possessions." It is this disparate treatment that was before the court, after three American Samoans living in Utah brought a challenge to the Immigration and Nationality Act, contending that the statutory denial of citizenship is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause. The Citizenship Clause was adopted after the Civil War primarily to protect the birthright citizenship of Black Americans, which was rejected by the Supreme Court prior to the Civil War. However, the meaning of the clause for residents of the territories has historically been contested — as has the force of constitutional protections in the territories altogether. In this case,, the American Samoans contend that the residents of all the territories should be considered"in the United States" for the purpose of citizenship. While American Samoans who live in the States may apply for citizenship, before they successfully do so they are denied many of the rights attached to citizenship, such as the right to vote, run for office, or serve on juries. The plaintiffs in this case say their career opportunities have been curtailed and that, as non-citizens, they are unable to sponsor immigration visas for their families. Applying for citizenship itself is onerous, can take several years, and is not guaranteed.But this case was not just about the reach of the Citizenship Clause. The Constitution's underlying disparity in treatment between the 50 states and the U.S. territories was enshrined in the, a series of cases decided in the early 1900s after the Spanish-American War. These cases — so called because of their"insular" focus — held that full constitutional rights apply only to"incorporated" territories destined for statehood, such as Hawaii, but not to"unincorporated" territories, which then included Puerto Rico, Guam, and the PhilippinesInfamously, the distinction between incorporated and unincorporated territories rested on explicitly racist stereotypes about individuals from those territories. Opposing Filipino statehood, for example, one senator called Filipinos"unruly and disobedient." Another called them"mongrels.", which were primarily about tariffs and jury trials in the territories, the Supreme Court upheld this suspect"incorporated vs. unincorporated" framework of rights. The Court's language and reasoning was hardly any better than that of Congress. One case emphasized that"differences of race, habits, laws and customs" in the territories might require action on the part of Congress that wouldn't be required if the territory were"inhabited only by people of the same race." Another referred to"savage tribes" which may be"[in]capable of self-government."that has drawn the condemnation of both liberal and conservative justices. In
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rejects appeal to give American Samoans citizenshipIn leaving in place an appeals court decision, the court also passed up an invitation to overturn a series of decisions dating back to 1901 known as the Insular Cases, replete with racist and anti-foreign rhetoric.
Read more »
American Samoans’ appeal for U.S. citizenship rejected by Supreme CourtAmerican Samoa is the only unincorporated territory of the United States whose inhabitants are not American citizens at birth.
Read more »
Supreme Court rejects appeal to give American Samoans citizenshipIn leaving in place an appeals court decision, the court also passed up an invitation to overturn a series of decisions dating back to 1901 known as the Insular Cases, replete with racist and anti-foreign rhetoric.
Read more »
Supreme Court rejects appeal to give American Samoans citizenshipThe justices refused to take up an appeal from people born in American Samoa, and living in Utah, who argued that a federal law declaring that they are “nationals, but not citizens, of the United States at birth” is unconstitutional.
Read more »
New York's gun law gets reprieve from federal appeals court - New York Amsterdam NewsNEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court on Wednesday allowed New York to continue enforcing its new gun law as it considers a lower court ruling that would block key provisions.
Read more »
Supreme Court declines to take up effort to secure birthright citizenship for American Samoans | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court declined Monday to take up a case asking whether those born in American Samoa are entitled to birthright citizenship under the Constitution's 14th Amendment.
Read more »