A group that filed a lawsuit over Pennsylvania's new congressional district map asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to look into whether they are entitled to an emergency order to halt it from taking effect.
Six plaintiffs, including two Republicans running for Congress this year, claim that the new map favors Democrats, citing a move to place Republican U.S. Reps. Glenn Thompson and Fred Keller into the same central district in the state. They argue it is the Legislature that must approve the 17-district map, not the state court.
“Relief is urgently needed because candidates are already campaigning for office under this unconstitutional map, and the statutory deadline for obtaining the needed signatures on nomination petitions is March 8,” the plaintiffs told the Supreme Court in filings Monday.PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT PICKS CONGRESSIONAL MAP FAVORABLE TO DEMOCRATS
The petition to the high court comes just days after a Harrisburg district judge denied their request for a temporary restraining order against the map, saying she would first sort"jurisdictional issues," to which plaintiffs say those concerns pertain to whether they have the standing to challenge the map.
In the 4-3 ruling last week, the Democratic-leaning state Supreme Court selected the so-called Carter plan, which removes a heavily Republican district and leaves nearly 90% of residents in the same district as the previous map, according to Spotlight PA.The Republican-led state Legislature passed a map that Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf vetoed last month, arguing that the map was unfair.
Meanwhile, a similar request was made to the high court last week pertaining to a North Carolina congressional redistricting map. Republican lawmakers in the state asked the Supreme Court for a stay of a recent lower court decision that found the state's 14 U.S. House seats were unconstitutionally gerrymandered.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Perspective | Supreme Court could thwart EPA’s ability to address climate changePerspective: No matter the outcome of West Virginia v. EPA, the agency can take action to engage the public and make data more accessible
Read more »
7 nominees announced for Utah Supreme Court vacancyThe Appellate Judicial Nominating Commission has announced its nominations for a vacancy on the Utah Supreme Court. According to a Monday news release, the seven nominees include Fourth District Court judges Jennifer Brown and Derek Pullan; Utah Court of Appeals judges Diana Hagen, Ryan Harris and Jill Pohlman; Salt Lake City Justice Court Judge Clemens Landau; and BYU Law School Professor Carolina Nunez.
Read more »
Supreme Court conservatives seem skeptical of EPA’s authority for broad emissions regulationSome of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices seemed skeptical Monday that the Environmental Protection Agency can proceed with sweeping regulation of climate-warming emissions from the nation’s power plants without clearer authority from Congress.
Read more »
The Supreme Court Is Preparing to Dismember the Clean Air ActAn emboldened supermajority prepares to gut the Clean Air Act's restrictions on greenhouse gasses.
Read more »
Supreme Court to hear challenge to Indian Child Welfare Act - Alaska Public MediaThe U.S. Supreme Court announced today that it will hear several cases challenging the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act.
Read more »
Prominent conservative judge who advised Pence on the 2020 election endorses Biden's Supreme Court nomineeA prominent conservative who helped Mike Pence defy Donald Trump's effort to overturn the election is backing Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson as President Biden's Supreme Court nominee
Read more »