Can the government levy taxes on unrealized wealth and paper profits if the owner never turned the gains into actual income? The Supreme Court will weigh in on the matter, which has widespread implications.
Can the government levy taxes on unrealized wealth and paper profits if the owner never turned the gains into actual income?
Wide swaths of the tax code are poised to revert to 2017 rules if Congress doesn’t pass new tax laws. The fight over what’s next for taxes is a “hurricane” in the making, some tax advisers say.The underlying case before the Supreme Court stems back to a Washington State couple’s 2006 investment decision. Charles and Kathleen Moore invested $40,000 to buy a minority stake in an Indian business focused on helping rural farmers.
The tactic kept the money from domestic tax authorities until it came back via avenues like a foreign subsidiary’s dividend, according to the Tax Policy Center. As of 2015, U.S. corporations built up $2.6 trillion in earnings within their foreign subsidiaries, the think tank said, pointing to a report from Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation.
Far beyond the particular tax, the decision created an opening for Congress to go much farther, according to Moore’s lawyers at the right-leaning Competitive Enterprise Institute and the international law firm Baker & Hostetler. “Lawyers for the federal government say the Constitutional amendment’s wording does not say income must be turned into a realized gain in order for income taxes to apply.”
On Monday, Moore’s attorneys lauded the Supreme Court’s decision to include the case in its fall docket. “The Constitution does not allow Congress to point at any pot of money and call it ‘income’ and then income-tax it,” said Andrew Grossman, a partner at Baker Hostetler and the lead lawyer for the Moores.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
US activists rally one year after Supreme Court allowed abortion bansNear-total abortion bans have taken effect in 14 states in the past year, even as polls show most Americans want abortion legal in all or most cases. The issue is expected to remain central in the congressional and presidential races.
Read more »
Letters to the Editor: Justice Samuel Alito's appalling ethical failure at the Supreme CourtJustice Alito's failure to disclose a six-figure gift from a billionaire donor involved in cases before the Supreme Court 'makes a mockery of judicial integrity,' says a reader.
Read more »
Fighting for trust: The painful journey of the Supreme Court after DobbsThreats abounded as the high court faced constant security challenges, a blistering leak investigation and wounding ethics scandals while struggling to find a new balance.
Read more »
Federal judge defends Clarence Thomas in new book, rejects 'pot shots' at Supreme Court | CNN PoliticsA federal appeals court judge previously on short lists for the Supreme Court is taking the rare step to broadly and publicly reject allegations that Justice Clarence Thomas has been improperly influenced by lavish gifts provided by a conservative billionaire, dismissing “pot shots” at the Supreme Court in general.
Read more »
Supreme Court’s Hansen decision is a win for immigration enforcementWords allow us to communicate intent and meaning to each other. We describe, persuade, encourage, reprimand, and praise. The ability to communicate through words is essential to any political order like our own, which is based on the rule of law.
Read more »
Expert says Utah wetlands are in danger following recent Supreme Court decisionIn late May, the court ruled that wetlands can only be regulated under the Clean Water Act if they have a 'continuous surface connection' to larger, regulated bodies of water.
Read more »