Study of Massachusetts hospitals underscores importance of patient safety, need for continued improvement

United States News News

Study of Massachusetts hospitals underscores importance of patient safety, need for continued improvement
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 medical_xpress
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 26 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 51%

Study of Massachusetts hospitals underscores importance of patientsafety, need for continued improvement nejm

The New England Journal of Medicine"The study clearly demonstrates a need for better tools, increased measurement of patient harm, and better implementation systems," said corresponding author David Westfall Bates, MD, medical director of Clinical and Quality Analysis for Mass General Brigham and chief of General Internal Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital.

The SafeCare study followed a similar methodology to the HMPS, performed in 1984, although ways of capturing levels of harm have improved in the ensuing decades. Through review of 2,800 inpatient charts from patient visits in 2018 to hospitals ranging from large to small, the research team identified at least one adverse event in 23.6% of admissions. Overall, 23% of these adverse events were judged to be preventable given what is known today, and 32% had serious or higher clinical severity.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

medical_xpress /  🏆 101. in UK

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Pandemic Spurs State To Reshape Massachusetts School Accountability TargetsPandemic Spurs State To Reshape Massachusetts School Accountability TargetsA state education department proposal to set new targets for school districts as they recover from the COVID-19 pandemic is being met with criticism from the state’s education board. The department is reassessing its existing target-setting methodology “to map out a concrete path to recovery for Massachusetts’ districts and schools” after MCAS scores from this year show continued student learning…
Read more »

A prospective observational study on impact of epinephrine administration route on acute myocardial infarction patients with cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory (iCPR study) - Critical CareBackground Epinephrine is routinely utilized in cardiac arrest; however, it is unclear if the route of administration affects outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients with cardiac arrest. Objectives To compare the efficacy of epinephrine administered via the peripheral intravenous (IV), central IV, and intracoronary (IC) routes. Methods Prospective two-center pilot cohort study of acute myocardial infarction patients who suffered cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory during percutaneous coronary intervention. We compared the outcomes of patients who received epinephrine via peripheral IV, central IV, or IC. Results 158 participants were enrolled, 48 (30.4%), 50 (31.6%), and 60 (38.0%) in the central IV, IC, and peripheral IV arms, respectively. Peripheral IV epinephrine administration route was associated with lower odds of achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC, odds ratio = 0.14, 95% confidence interval = 0.05–0.36, p | 0.0001) compared with central IV and IC administration. (There was no difference between central IV and IC routes; p = 0.9343.) The odds of stent thrombosis were significantly higher with the IC route (IC vs. peripheral IV OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 1.5–14.3, p = 0.0094; IC vs. central IV OR = 6.0, 95% CI = 1.9–19.2, p = 0.0025). Post-ROSC neurologic outcomes were better for central IV and IC routes when compared with peripheral IV. Conclusion Epinephrine administration via central IV and IC routes was associated with a higher rate of ROSC and better neurologic outcomes compared with peripheral IV administration. IC administration was associated with a higher risk of stent thrombosis. Trial registration This trial is registered at NCT05253937 . Graphical Abstract
Read more »

Firefighters more likely to die from cancer than general public, study findsFirefighters more likely to die from cancer than general public, study findsA new study has found that firefighters have a mortality rate for all cancers 1.6 times higher than other people, with researchers suggesting that excess cancer mortality is likely linked to different kinds of exposures and fire toxins.
Read more »

Year-long study tracking thousands of prices names cheapest supermarket in UKYear-long study tracking thousands of prices names cheapest supermarket in UKWhich? tracked hundreds of thousands of grocery prices across eight major supermarkets to name the UK's cheapest
Read more »

Study explores incidence, severity, and long COVID associations of SARS-CoV-2 reinfectionsStudy explores incidence, severity, and long COVID associations of SARS-CoV-2 reinfectionsResearchers used electronic health records to characterize the incidence, biomarkers, attributes, and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections and evaluated the association between reinfections and long coronavirus disease (COVID).
Read more »

Association of shift work with incident dementia: a community-based cohort study - BMC MedicineAssociation of shift work with incident dementia: a community-based cohort study - BMC MedicineBackground Some observational studies had found that shift work would increase risks of metabolic disorders, cancers, and cardiovascular diseases, but there was no homogeneous evidence of such an association between shift work and incident dementia. This study aimed to investigate whether shift work would increase the risk of dementia in a general population. Methods One hundred seventy thousand seven hundred twenty-two employed participants without cognitive impairment or dementia at baseline recruited between 2006 and 2010 were selected from the UK Biobank cohort study. Follow-up occurred through June 2021. Shift work status at baseline was self-reported by participants and they were categorized as non-shift workers or shift workers. Among shift workers, participants were further categorized as night shift workers or shift but non-night shift workers. The primary outcome was all-cause dementia in a time-to-event analysis, and the secondary outcomes were subtypes of dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, and other types of dementia. Results In total, 716 dementia cases were observed among 170,722 participants over a median follow-up period of 12.4 years. Shift workers had an increased risk of all-cause dementia as compared with non-shift workers after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08–1.58); however, among shift workers, night shift work was not associated with the risk of dementia (HR, 1.04, 95% CI, 0.73–1.47). We found no significant interaction between shift work and genetic predisposition to dementia on the primary outcome (P for interaction = 0.77). Conclusions Shift work at baseline was associated with an increased risk of all-cause dementia. Among shift workers, there was no significant association between night shift work and the risk of dementia. The increased incidence of dementia in shift workers did not differ between participants in different genetic risk strata for dementia.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-28 19:50:35