Featuring Leonardo DiCaprio among its producers, Jonah Tulis' film uses previously unheard dictaphone recordings to capture Serling's thoughts on politics, television and more.
Persuasively showing that Rod Serling was one of the medium’s true prophets, a prolific thinker capable of seeing the world around him and using it as a prism to look both backward and forward,proves less deft in examining Rod Serling as a man.
Despite interviews with Serling’s wife and daughters, as well as several collaborators, this remains a portrait of the artist as a very wise fortune cookie instead of a flesh-and-blood storyteller whose work still thrills us in a way that countless contemporaries, however acclaimed, never achieved.One of Tulis’ central aesthetic conceits is a bunch of re-enactments in which Serling is featured either as a blurred face, a smoking profile or a silhouette, and that’s how he ultimately comes across in the film. He’s a suit and a cigarette and an impeccable hair-do, rarely a person., but more than that, it made me crave a four-hour documentary capable of a greater level of humanizing and specificity.Serling apparently dictated letters and scripts and general observations on the industry he helped shape, providing what, in Tulis’ hands, evolves into the voluminous narration that guides the documentary.as a documentary told primarily through the perspective of its subject, eschewing expert outside observers and avoiding talking heads. Instead, Serling’s recordings, as well as a wealth of in-depth television interviews over the years, steer the film, with audio from interviews with his wife Carol and daughters filling in personal gaps. On the professional side, Tulis has interviews with severalwriters and producers, but it’s never clear which of those interviews were conducted for this film and which existed from earlier untold provenance. You can take the “all archival/no talking heads” approach to documentary storytelling if you have the visual footage necessary to hang all of that talking on. Tulis has all those TV interviews, a decent cache of home movies — the Serling family’s house in Pacific Palisades and lake house in Interlaken, N.Y. both look like nice places to have raised a family — and lots and lots of clips, usually disseminated in lengthy montages, from Serling’s various TV shows. But it isn’t enough, and the documentary’s over-reliance on black-and-white re-enactments is a flaw. It isn’t just that the re-enactments don’t seem to have been made with a cohesive sense of perspective; they’re also shot in a black-and-white digital style that, while pretty, in no way matches the rich tones that the best of 1950s and 1960s TV was able to achieve. The result here is that every transition from period footage to newly shot imagery feels slightly jarring. Since presumably this approach was intended to avoid having cutaways to talking heads, which themselves would have felt jarring, I wonder why nobody attempted to doctor the re-enactments to tone down the hard lighting and crisp edges. Everybody in the re-enactments wears nice suits and smokes, but otherwise nothing is really evoked. Perhaps actually seeing Carol and the daughters would have helped bring the human side of Serling to the foreground? I came away with no sense of who he was at home, other than “extremely busy,” nor who he was in a writers room or boardroom. The things that shaped his perspective are either discussed in the most generic of terms — his time in World War II was formative, but bland — or ignored entirely. It doesn’t matter if Serling was a practicing Jew in his adult life — the Internet suggests he was not — but so much of his worldview, including his thoughts on civil rights and the initial lure of fighting in WWII in the first place, comes from at least a secular Jewish place. Eliding it entirely erases something that is, at least to me, important. Whatever its origins, Serling’s dogmatic and argumentative spirit is the thing that the documentary captures best. Tulis shows how Serling’s passion for civil rights and later opposition to the Vietnam War colored so much of what he wrote, and so much of what he believed that television, as a medium, was capable of accomplishing. Tulis isn’t always able to give enough depth on specific Serling scripts and how they fit into his worldview, but there are brief nods toepisodes like “The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street,” “The Invaders” and “Time Enough at Last” as installments that realized his aspirations. And he’s able to trace how the advertiser-driven focus of television homogenized scripts like the teleplay, doomed at least in part because CBS executives had ties to Republican politicians who didn’t like the show’s liberal inflections. It does not take an imagination like that of Rod Serling to envision something similar occurring today .has as a documentary or as an overall profile of its subject, it underlines Serling’s reputation as one of those visionaries whose thoughts on the medium are eternally relevant, doing its part to negate Serling’s self-effacing quote, “I don’t think, truly, that’s there’s anything I’ve written that’ll last, that’ll stand the test of time.”Executive Producers: Anne Serling, Jodi Serling, Taylor DiGilio, Sera C.C. Verdi, Anthony Gudas, Rick Lazes, Gareth West, Maurice Antonio, Aristotle Andrulakis, Nicholas de Graffenreid Producers: Chad A. Verdi, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jennifer Davisson, Phillip Watson, Michelle Verdi, Chad Verdi, Jr., Paul Luba, Jonah Tulis, Blake J. HarrisWhy 1983’s Apocalypse Film ‘Testament’ Feels Timelier Than Ever: “The Terror Now Is That We Will Attack”‘Dune 3’ Is “a Thriller,” Says Denis Villeneuve as He Launches First Trailer With Zendaya and Robert Pattinson by His Side'Serling' Review: Doc on 'Twilight Zone' Creator Captures Rod Serling the Visionary, but Rarely Rod Serling the Man'The Rise of the Red Hot Chili Peppers: Our Brother, Hillel' Review: Netflix Doc Is Funny and Moving, but Could Use More Hillel SlovakSign up for Now See This for recommendations on what to watch and why from THR’s chief TV critic. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. // This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the GoogleThe Hollywood Reporter is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2026 The Hollywood Reporter, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Trump: FCC will review licenses of news outlets; calls Iran 'master of media manipulation'President Trump posted to X on Sunday evening, criticizing the media and calling Iran the “Master of Media Manipulation and Public Relations.”
Read more »
SXSW Film Review: Over Your Dead BodyThe Austin Chronicle is an independent, locally owned and operated alternative newsweekly that reflects the heart and soul of Austin, Texas.
Read more »
SXSW Film Review: SenderThe Austin Chronicle is an independent, locally owned and operated alternative newsweekly that reflects the heart and soul of Austin, Texas.
Read more »
The Fox Review: Off-Beat, Surrealist Aussie Comedy Is Not As Weird As It Should BeJai Courtney and the Fox stare down into the pit in The Fox
Read more »
2026 Kia EV9 GT | PH ReviewFirst of four Kia GTs for '26 is the biggest and arguably silliest: a 508hp, 2.7-tonne family bus with faux gears
Read more »
Paul Skenes to A-Rod About Representing USA at WBC: 'It's A Different Level'Pirates ace Paul Skenes talks to Alex Rodriguez about representing Team USA at the WBC.
Read more »
