SCOTUS Will Decide Whether Public Officials Can Block Naysayers on Social Media

United States News News

SCOTUS Will Decide Whether Public Officials Can Block Naysayers on Social Media
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 Gizmodo
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 33 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 51%

SCOTUS will hear two cases this fall looking at whether public figures can block social media users for posting criticism on their accounts.

Freed case, city manager James Freed blocked Kevin Lindke from his Facebook account after he criticizedovid-19 restrictions on Freed’s page. The Michigan court ruled in favor of the city official, creating confusion about what falls under First Amendment rights.

Both cases will now go to the Supreme Court where questions continue to circulate about whether public and government officials can block social media accounts simply because they don’t like what people are saying. This comes after SCOTUS reviewed a similar case against former President in 2021, but was thrown out because, by the time the lawsuit was brought forward, Trump had left office. The absence of a judgment leaves the burgeoning question of whether public official accounts can ban or block other users.With the two new cases heading to the Supreme Court, social media platforms and users may get the answers they’ve been looking for.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Gizmodo /  🏆 556. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

President of planned parenthood reacts to SCOTUS abortion pill rulingPresident of planned parenthood reacts to SCOTUS abortion pill rulingThe Supreme Court ruled for mifepristone, the most commonly used abortion pill, to stay on the market until the Court of Appeals decides whether the FDA’s approval of the drug over 20 years ago was valid. The president of Planned Parenthood, Alexis McGill Johnson, reminds us to not forget the patients and providers on the other side of this ruling and explains how the fight for reproductive rights is far from over. She joined American Voices to discuss.
Read more »

Reagan-appointed judge, now 95, faces probe into whether she can still do the jobReagan-appointed judge, now 95, faces probe into whether she can still do the jobJudge Pauline Newman, 95, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, is fighting an investigation by colleagues who allege she can no longer carry out her duties.
Read more »

Top 2024 Republicans divided on whether abortion is a state issue as presidential race heats upTop 2024 Republicans divided on whether abortion is a state issue as presidential race heats upTop 2024 Republican hopefuls are divided over whether to kick the growing issue of abortion to the states or lean on the federal government to safeguard the unborn.
Read more »

Pence to decide on presidential run 'well before late June'Pence to decide on presidential run 'well before late June'Former Vice President Mike Pence will make an announcement on whether he will be launching a 2024 presidential bid 'well before late June.'
Read more »

Mike Pence will decide on 2024 presidential run by JuneMike Pence will decide on 2024 presidential run by June“Anyone that would be serious about seeking the Republican nomination would need to be in this contest by June,” former veep Mike Pence said.
Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court to decide if public officials can block critics on social mediaU.S. Supreme Court to decide if public officials can block critics on social mediaThe U.S. Supreme Court, exploring free speech rights in the social media era, on Monday agreed to consider whether the Constitution's First Amendment bars government officials from blocking their critics on platforms like Facebook and Twitter.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-12 07:53:06