Scientific research must be reviewed by other scientists before it is published, but some researchers say they find feedback from ChatGPT more useful
ChatGPT can provide researchers with useful feedback on their papers, suggesting it could supplement the human peer review process that helps scientific journals decide which studies to publish. But others are sceptical that ChatGPT could play a role in peer review.
Peer review is a critical component of scientific publishing. However, many journals and research conferences are struggling to recruit enough human peer reviewers – who typically volunteer their time for free – to evaluate the growing number of submitted papers.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
How to replace Siri with ChatGPT on your iPhone 15 ProYou can replace Siri with ChatGPT thanks to the iPhone 15 Pros' Action button - here's how easy it is to search the web.
Read more »
Study finds ChatGPT better at diagnosing depression than your doctorInteresting Engineering is a cutting edge, leading community designed for all lovers of engineering, technology and science.
Read more »
We Asked ChatGPT if the SEC Will Approve a Spot Bitcoin ETF This YearCrypto Blog
Read more »
AI Run Amok: Researchers Discover ChatGPT Can Figure Out Everything About You from Simple ConversationsSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »
Baidu unveils Ernie 4.0 AI system, says overall performance ‘on par with ChatGPT’Baidu launches Ernie 4.0, CEO Robin Li claims it's on par with OpenAI's ChatGPT.
Read more »
Stack Overflow lays off 28% of workforce after ChatGPT disruptionThe company's CEO Prashanth Chandrasekar said the layoffs are a move to maintain a path to profitability.
Read more »