On Wednesday, Florida plans to execute David Joseph Pittman.
On Wednesday, Florida plans to execute David Joseph Pittman. He is to be put to death for his role in a triple homicide that occurred 35 years ago. He has had long-standing cognitive impairments, having registered an IQ score of 70 before he turned 18.
On Wednesday, Florida plans to execute David Joseph Pittman. He is to be put to death for his role in a triple homicide that occurred 35 years ago.. He has had long-standing cognitive impairments, having registered an IQ score of 70 before he turned 18. His lawyers note that he “has trouble reading basic words like ‘dog,’ ” and that he “often needs to have things explained to him repeatedly.”, as the Tampa Bay Times reports, “the Florida Supreme Court—which had since become more conservative with the retirement of three longtime justices regarded as liberal—reversed themselves, declaring that the Atkins ruling did not apply retroactively.” Pittman’s intellectual disability in itself should be enough to stop the state from executing him. But there are other reasons why Florida should not go forward with its plan, the most important of which is that his death warrant, like others in the Sunshine State, was issued following a process that denied him basic constitutional protections. ItIn Florida, the governor is under no obligation to review the legal proceedings in a death penalty case, to make a determination whether the condemned is competent to be executed, or to make sure that death warrants are not being issued in a racially discriminatory way. The Constitution demands more.The law sets a 30-day time limit for the governor to issue a warrant for execution “if the executive clemency process has concluded,” from the date the clerk of the court notifies the governor that a death row inmate has exhausted all of his appeals. Crucially, it grants the governor great latitude in selecting to whom he will issue a death warrant.“40 active death warrants have been issued in the United States thus far in 2025—more than a third of them were issued by one individual, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.” Only Pennsylvania gives the governor similar authority to decide who will be selected for execution from among the state’s death row population. But unlike Florida, which this year has executed more people than any other state, Pennsylvania “has not executed anyone in over 25 years” and has “a moratorium on executions.” As the DPIC notes, “At one time, most execution warrants were issued solely by governors. … In recent decades, legislatures generally expanded the role of the judiciary, requiring the courts to weigh in before an execution is set.”Judges are less likely to issue death warrants to score political points or to satisfy prosecutors or the families of murder victims. They understand the ins and outs of the capital appeal process where “multiple claims can be pending simultaneously in state and federal court.”Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph SternA look at the death warrants he has issued suggests that he seems much more disposed to move ahead with execution in cases involving Black defendants and white victims.“significant and obvious evidence of racial bias and arbitrariness in the warrant selection process.” In the past five years, 94 percent of the state’s executions were carried out in cases involving white victims.Of the Florida executions that have taken place since 1976 that did not involve a white victim, only two had a white defendant, and not a single case involved a white person killing a Black person., is unlikely to “sort inmates by death-worthiness—things like offense conduct, blame, or future dangerousness.” That makes it even more troubling that a single person would have the final say in sending someone to their death and be able to make that determination in secret, with no review and no accountability. Moreover, under current Supreme Court precedent, the issuance of a death warrant plays an important role in determining the kind of legal claims a death row inmate can raise. The American Bar Associationthat “a state’s decision to set an execution date may significantly alter the framework under which the prisoner’s legal claims are resolved, increasing the difficulty of obtaining substantive relief and decreasing the chances that any court will even hear the merits of the claim.”“This fact,” the ABA says, “is especially concerning in the context of cases raising innocence claims, where the prisoner’s execution might result in the ultimate injustice.”requires the trial court that handed down a death sentence to conduct a “death warrant hearing” before an execution can be authorized.I Won a $5 Million Judgment Against the MyPillow Guy. Now I’m Taking Him to the Supreme Court.Young Conservative Men and Women Have Very Different Ideas of Success. I Think I Know What’s Going On. The defendant must be present at the hearing, and they may be represented by counsel. The law also requires the judge conducting the hearing to “determine whether the defendant intends to pursue any challenges to the sentence or conviction.”Only after doing so may the trial judge issue a death warrant. That warrant is then delivered to “the superintendent of the correctional institution designated by the Director of the Department of Corrections,” where the execution will be carried out.Finally, Oregon law requires the judge conducting the death warrant hearing to make findings on the record whether “the defendant suffers from a mental condition that prevents the defendant from comprehending the reasons for the sentence of death or its implications.” Such a hearing would have made a big difference in Pittman’s case. If and when the state kills, every decision, including whether and when to issue a death warrant, must be done publicly, deliberately, and in a way that accords the condemned due process of law. Unfortunately, David Joseph Pittman, and others executed in Florida, have not been provided such
Ron-Desantis Florida Death-Penalty
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Turning Point USA announces plans for Charlie Kirk's memorial serviceTurning Point USA on Saturday announced plans for a memorial service in honor of Charlie Kirk.
Read more »
Residents of NYCHA complexes in Chelsea protest demolition, construction plansAccording to NYCHA, the existing buildings on West 17th and West 26th streets will be demolished and new buildings will be constructed.
Read more »
Charlie Kirk Funeral Plans Announced, Phoenix Shooting Leaves Three Injured, Hit-and-Run Case UnsolvedFOX10Phoenix.com reports on the funeral service for slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk, a shooting in Phoenix that injured three people, and the ongoing investigation into a two-year-old hit-and-run case.
Read more »
Florida Proud to Announce It’s Done Caring About Public HealthGovernor Ron DeSantis never fails to remind us all that he‘s the worst thing to happen to the Sunshine State.
Read more »
San Antonio’s Ethics Review Board to hear complaint against former Mayor Ron NirenbergA 63-page complaint alleges Nirenberg accepted a signed jersey from Spur Victor Wembanyama without disclosing it to the city.
Read more »
How Luigi Mangione Is Fighting the Trump Justice Department’s “Unprecedented” Rush to Execute HimLawyers for the alleged killer of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson argue that their client’s constitutional rights are being violated by the government, while legal experts question Attorney General Pam Bondi’s death penalty pursuit. “I’ve been handling capital cases for over 20 years,” one tells VF, “and I’ve never seen anything like it.
Read more »