A recent large study from the U.K. finds surprising links between personality and preference for war.
Conspiracy theorists are less likely to be pro-war.As the Iran military conflict escalates, the debate around the war appears focused on issues such as legal or moral justifications. Some remain more focused on whether such combat can be effective in achieving statedSource: The National WWI Museum, Kansas City The study involved a large sample of over one thousand of the U.
K. population, uncovering intriguing links between personality features and level of support for war. Entitled"Authoritarianism and the Psychology of War: Exploring Personality Traits in the Legitimation of Military Conflict," the investigation found, like previous research, that men were significantly more likely to support military conflict compared to women, and so were older people compared to younger, while those with more right‐leaning political views were also more likely to back warfare.maltreatment was measured using questions in the study assessing emotional and physical abuse . Childhood harm was a significant predictor of pro-war attitudes, suggesting that early‐life adversity contributes to later war‐support. A personality factor referred to as"social dominance orientation," or SDO, also significantly predicted war support. Social dominance orientation refers to your preference for"hierarchical world views," and these are associated with militaristic attitudes. SDO is about your degree of preference for inequality in society. Those who score low on SDO adopt a more egalitarian ideology that prefers not to divide people into categories, or groups, instead opting for views that concord with sentiments such as the"universal rights of man," or"all humans are God's children." Low SDO scorers prefer less group inequality. High SDO scorers will tend to agree with the following statements in questionnaires: Winning is more important than how the game is played. Getting ahead by any means necessary. Sometimes war is necessary to put other countries in their place. Inferior groups should stay in their place.These researchers also found that a feature of personality referred to as"authoritarian submission" was strongly associated with war support. This refers to those who exhibit high deference to authority and who are submissive to established powers. As a result, they tend to display aggressiveness and hostility towards those deviating from norms endorsed by authority figures. It would appear that the more people are submissive to authority, the more they become tough on those who deviate from what the authorities prefer.Our country would be great if we did what the authorities tell us to do. It’s important for children to learn to obey authorities. People that criticize the authorities create useless doubts in people’s minds.personality type The theory is that authoritarian leaders like Adolf Hitler, who led Nazi Germany into World War II, couldn’t have achieved the power and control they developed over millions of followers, without some psychological feature, such as ‘authoritarian submission’ being present to a degree.The authors suggest that conspiracy theorists' skepticism toward state and military narratives may actually lead them to oppose war. It has been suggested by some that the timing of the war coincides with a desire to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein files, and so this finding from this study may be particularly relevant to how support for the war plays out over time amongst Trump’s traditional support base.Another personality feature found to be particularly strongly associated with pro-war attitudes was sadism, which is characterized by enjoyment of cruelty and harm. The authors argued ‘sadism’ becomes a uniquely relevant factor in understanding why some back fighting as a legitimate means of conflict resolution.emerged as the other key psychological trait, significantly linked with support for battles. Those who score high on psychopathy exhibit callousness and emotional detachment. But it was sadism and the tendency to derive pleasure from harming others which was the personality characteristic more likely to be linked with war support., were found, perhaps surprisingly, not significant, indicating that support for war is not primarily driven by self‐importance or strategic manipulation, but rather by a deeper inclination toward aggression and dominance.One of the intriguing implications of research such as this is possible speculation over"reverse engineering" the finding. In other words, if you meet people who are strongly pro- or anti-war, it might be possible to deduce, or predict certain aspects of their personality, and even childhood, given the links found by this study. Another possible implication is that arguing or trying to persuade those who differ from your own viewpoint on the conflict is likely to be relatively fruitless unless you take into account the psychological factors illuminated by this research. For example, the anti-war lobby might be better served in trying to change the minds of pro-war supporters by deploying a particularly military-looking spokesperson. Perhaps a senior general in the U.S. military, who may be retired now, but who comes out publicly against the war, should be more persuasive, given the"authoritarian submission" finding above. But this might be difficult to achieve given the tendency for the military, retired or not, to close ranks during a war. Either way, this kind of research suggests we may go to war for more deep-rooted psychological reasons than normally admitted in public debate. Those who successfully persuade the public to support hostilities, or maybe even galvanize popular movements against military conflict, may also be deploying more psychological munitions than political weaponry in theAuthoritarianism and the Psychology of War: Exploring Personality Traits in the Legitimation of Military Conflict Alexander Yendell and David Herbert. Research Institute Social Cohesion, Section Leipzig, Germany. Research Centre Global Dynamics, Leipzig University, Germany. Department of Sociology, University of Bergen, Norway. Politics and Governance 2025 • Volume 13 • Article 10292is a Consultant Psychiatrist working in private practice in the UK and is the author ofSelf Tests are all about you. Are you outgoing or introverted? Are you a narcissist? Does perfectionism hold you back? Find out the answers to these questions and more with Psychology Today.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
New research reveals a possible win-win mindset for parents and kids.What could help parents shift focus away from being an ideal, flawless parent to another viewpoint that might be more sustainable and fulfilling over time?
Read more »
AI Personas As Therapist-Supervisors Can Improve Clinical Judgement Of Therapists And Be Helpful Research CatalystsTherapists can make use of AI personas that acts as therapist-supervisors. The feedback can be tremendous. Here's how to proceed. An AI Insider scoop.
Read more »
Research suggests that specific tactics can help you be more adaptable.The pace of modern life is hectic, but there are specific tactics that can help you adapt to it.
Read more »
New research explores the impact keeping secrets has on us, for good or ill.We all have secrets, including secrets from ourselves. They are a source of mystery and even excitement. Researchers are now exploring what keeping secrets costs.
Read more »
Certain Habits May Help Reduce Risk Of ALS, New Research IndicatesA large-scale study found early waking schedules and getting regular physical activity were both associated with a reduced risk of developing ALS.
Read more »
Bitcoin Did Not Crash Because of Jane Street, Galaxy Research SaysThe Jane Street controversy has been manufactured by the cryptocurrency community on X, according to X researcher Alex Thorn..
Read more »