Igor Bobic is a senior HuffPost reporter who covers Congress, the White House, and political campaigns. He can be reached at igor.bobic@huffpost.com and is on Twitter @igorbobic.
With the administration challenging the Court and Congress, independent reporting is the only thing standing between you and the noise. Your membership funds the courage to ask the hard questions. Don't let the truth be sidelined, join HuffWASHINGTON — If President Donald Trump’s administration seems confused about the goals of the war he launched against Iran , GOP lawmakers don’t seem to have any answers either.
Four days into a war which Trump has said could last weeks and has already left six U.S. service members and hundreds of Iranian civilians dead, Republican members of Congress offered distinctly different justifications for the strikes. Some want regime change in Iran, while some want to destroy its nuclear weapons program and ability to launch long-range missiles. Others prefer a more limited mission akin to Trump’s military intervention in Venezuela.agree on, however, is that President Donald Trump is within his legal bounds to carry out the operation and that Congress doesn’t need to vote to authorize it, as required by the U.S. Constitution. That is, as long as it doesn’t involve boots on the ground. “It’s using air and naval assets, to go, not completely eliminate, but certainly diminish the capability that Iran has in terms of ballistic missiles,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Monday when asked about his understanding of the war. “You’ve got a strait there that’s really important to global trade, and there have been attacks on American ships in that region by the Iranians already, so I think it’s, to me, that’s my understanding of it.” House Speaker Mike Johnson called the massive and unprecedented U.S. military strikes against Iran a “defensive” action taken to “counter the imminent threat posed by Iran’s aggression toward American troops, citizens, installations and assets.” And he suggested, after a classified briefing from Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Monday, that Israel dragged Trump into the war by threatening to attack Iran.“If Israel fired upon Iran and took action against Iran to take out the missiles, then would have immediately retaliated against U.S. personnel and assets,” Johnson said as some Other Republicans said they hoped the U.S. would go further by changing the government of Iran, a far more difficult task that could require months of war.in an interview on Fox News. “They have been killing Americans through their proxies for decades. It’s about not just nuclear weapons, it’s about being the largest state sponsor of terrorism. This regime is in its death throes. Finish them off.”Sen. Bill Hagerty , meanwhile, argued that the U.S. is not engaged in a “war” in Iran, even though both Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have called it one. “What done is launch a very targeted operation to take out the ballistic missile manufacturing capacity and the launch capacity of Iran,” Hagerty told HuffPost. The shifting and incoherent explanations for the war only added to the confusion on Capitol Hill. At first, Trump and his aides said the goal was regime change, urging the people of Iran to rise up and overtake their government. Then they said it was about threat reduction, then regime change again. Trump has given shifting answers in phone interviews with over a dozen reporters about the timeline for the war, ranging from anywhere from a few days to a month or longer.Sen. Thom Tillis , who is supportive of eliminating the threat Iran poses, said the administration could be clearer about its intentions with the American people. “If it is the intent of affecting a regime change, then clearly it’s going to be a longer-term investment on the part of the United States,” Tillis said. “If it’s a recalibration on ending or eliminating the nuclear program, that needs to be short and done. So we just need clarity on it, because I’ve heard both of those sorts of objectives expressed over the past few days.” But Sen. Tim Sheehy dismissed the idea that the Trump administration needed a more coherent explanation for going to war against Iran.“The reason you’re hearing so many reasons is the varied threats this regime presents,” he said on In the wake of the Vietnam War, Congress passed a law attempting to assert its constitutional authority over war-making. The War Powers Act requires the president to notify Congress when committing the U.S. armed forces to hostilities in an emergency when the country is under imminent threat and gives lawmakers the power to trigger snap disapproval votes. The House and Senate will both hold votes to block military action against Iran under that statute this week, but they’re both likely to fail due to bipartisan opposition . Even if they succeed, Trump could simply veto them.“I think the administration is in compliance with the War Powers statute,” Sen. Josh Hawley , who voted in favor of limiting hostilities against Venezuela earlier this year, told reporters on Monday. Only a few Republicans contend Trump has overstepped his authority in launching the war. Sen. Rand Paul has suggested he’d vote to end the war, as has Rep. Thomas Massie . And Rep. Warren Davidson has also complained about Congress being left out of the decision to attack, but he hasn’t said outright he’d vote to rein in the administration.he opposed the war and that it was a betrayal of Trump’s “America First” slogan. He said he would work with Rep. Ro Khanna , his Democratic partner on forcing the Trump administration to release the Epstein files, to force lawmakers to vote on a war powers resolution.“The Constitution requires a vote, and your Representative needs to be on record as opposing or supporting this war,” Massie said.Realness delivered to your inbox By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our
Iran Wars And Conflicts John Thune
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Iran live updates: Pentagon officials hold news conference on Iran strikesThe U.S. and Israel are continuing strikes on targets across Iran.
Read more »
Iran live updates: Pentagon officials hold news conference on Iran strikesThe U.S. and Israel are continuing strikes on targets across Iran.
Read more »
Donald Trump’s Iran War Splits Republicans: New PollA new poll revealed whether Republicans are in support of the Trump administration's recent strikes against Iran.
Read more »
Democrats and Republicans Clash Over Limiting Trump's Military Power in IranAmidst escalating tensions following U.S. and Israeli attacks, Democrats and a few Republicans are pushing to limit President Trump's military authority in Iran. The efforts face significant hurdles, with previous similar attempts failing to gain traction. The resolutions seek to curb the president's ability to act without congressional approval.
Read more »
Vulnerable Republicans in California's redrawn congressional districts back war in IranRepublicans facing tough reelection fights in this year's midterms are backing President Trump's attacks on Iran, which are unpopular, according to recent polling.
Read more »
Reporter's Notebook: Congressional Republicans stand by Trump on Iran military action despite campaign promiseFox News Channel offers its audiences in-depth news reporting, along with opinion and analysis encompassing the principles of free people, free markets and diversity of thought, as an alternative to the left-of-center offerings of the news marketplace.
Read more »