Recommendations for Verifying HDR Subjective Testing Workflows: Abstract and Introduction

United States News News

Recommendations for Verifying HDR Subjective Testing Workflows: Abstract and Introduction
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 hackernoon
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 376 sec. here
  • 8 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 154%
  • Publisher: 51%

In this paper, researchers present a set of recommendations for conformance testing of High Dynamic Range displays and content.

Author: Vibhoothi,Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland ; Angeliki Katsenou, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland & Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Bristol, United Kingdom ; John Squires, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland ; Franc¸ois Pitie, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland ; Anil Kokaram, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland .

Table of Links Abstract and Introduction HDR Standards HDR Subjective Testing Workflow Conclusion and References Abstract—Over the past few years, there has been an increase in the demand and availability of High Dynamic Range displays and content. To ensure the production of high-quality materials, human evaluation is required. However, ascertaining whether the full playback pipeline is indeed HDR-compliant can be challenging. In this paper, we present a set of recommendations for conformance testing to validate various aspects of the testing workflow, including playback, displays, brightness, colours, and viewing environment. We assessed the effectiveness of HDR conversion techniques used in current standards development for making source materials. Additionally, we evaluate HDR display technologies, including OLED and LCD, using both consumer television and a reference monitor Index Terms—HDR, testing workflow, testing environment, playback, video coding. I. INTRODUCTION In recent years, HDR displays sales and content delivery have increased , . Oftentimes, the displayed video output may not always be true HDR. It is hard to confirm whether the playback is actually HDR or to cross-check a playback pipeline disruption. Validating this is important for quality assessment studies and it yields technical challenges. The development of standards testing protocols for subjective viewing environments for HDR videos is being led by the Video Quality Experts Group , International Telecommunication Union Recommendations, and the European Broadcasters Union for both televisions and broadcast applications –. Despite efforts made by previous authors to explore and adapt these techniques for HDR subjective studies –, there are still issues unresolved. Particularly, the configuration and technical validation of the playback pipeline is often not transparently presented in the literature. Thus, there is currently a lack of an HDR quality assessment framework that can be readily used to conform with these standards. Taking into account all the above, in this paper, we introduce an HDR quality assessment testing workflow , which comprises three important elements, a) the documentation of the playback pipeline, b) the HDR intermediate file conversions, and c) the testing environment. This work was funded by DTIF EI Grant No DT-2019-0068 and The ADAPT SFI Research Center. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. Author: Vibhoothi,Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland ; Angeliki Katsenou, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland & Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Bristol, United Kingdom ; John Squires, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland ; Franc¸ois Pitie, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland ; Anil Kokaram, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland . Author: Author: Vibhoothi,Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland ; Angeliki Katsenou, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland & Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Bristol, United Kingdom ; John Squires, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland ; Franc¸ois Pitie, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland ; Anil Kokaram, Sigmedia Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland . Table of Links Abstract and Introduction HDR Standards HDR Subjective Testing Workflow Conclusion and References Abstract and Introduction Abstract and Introduction HDR Standards HDR Standards HDR Subjective Testing Workflow HDR Subjective Testing Workflow Conclusion and References Conclusion and References Abstract—Over the past few years, there has been an increase in the demand and availability of High Dynamic Range displays and content. To ensure the production of high-quality materials, human evaluation is required. However, ascertaining whether the full playback pipeline is indeed HDR-compliant can be challenging. In this paper, we present a set of recommendations for conformance testing to validate various aspects of the testing workflow, including playback, displays, brightness, colours, and viewing environment. We assessed the effectiveness of HDR conversion techniques used in current standards development for making source materials. Additionally, we evaluate HDR display technologies, including OLED and LCD, using both consumer television and a reference monitor Abstract —Over the past few years, there has been an increase in the demand and availability of High Dynamic Range displays and content. To ensure the production of high-quality materials, human evaluation is required. However, ascertaining whether the full playback pipeline is indeed HDR-compliant can be challenging. In this paper, we present a set of recommendations for conformance testing to validate various aspects of the testing workflow, including playback, displays, brightness, colours, and viewing environment. We assessed the effectiveness of HDR conversion techniques used in current standards development for making source materials. Additionally, we evaluate HDR display technologies, including OLED and LCD, using both consumer television and a reference monitor Abstract Index Terms—HDR, testing workflow, testing environment, playback, video coding. Index Terms —HDR, testing workflow, testing environment, playback, video coding. Index Terms I. INTRODUCTION In recent years, HDR displays sales and content delivery have increased , . Oftentimes, the displayed video output may not always be true HDR. It is hard to confirm whether the playback is actually HDR or to cross-check a playback pipeline disruption. Validating this is important for quality assessment studies and it yields technical challenges. The development of standards testing protocols for subjective viewing environments for HDR videos is being led by the Video Quality Experts Group , International Telecommunication Union Recommendations, and the European Broadcasters Union for both televisions and broadcast applications –. Despite efforts made by previous authors to explore and adapt these techniques for HDR subjective studies –, there are still issues unresolved. Particularly, the configuration and technical validation of the playback pipeline is often not transparently presented in the literature. Thus, there is currently a lack of an HDR quality assessment framework that can be readily used to conform with these standards. Taking into account all the above, in this paper, we introduce an HDR quality assessment testing workflow , which comprises three important elements, a) the documentation of the playback pipeline, b) the HDR intermediate file conversions, and c) the testing environment. This work was funded by DTIF EI Grant No DT-2019-0068 and The ADAPT SFI Research Center. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

hackernoon /  🏆 532. in US

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

America’s greatest regional hot dogs: A highly subjective guideAmerica’s greatest regional hot dogs: A highly subjective guideHot dogs are synonymous with summertime across the United States, but the best way to top them remains a major source of debate.
Read more »

VERIFYING claims from the presidential debate between Trump and BidenVERIFYING claims from the presidential debate between Trump and BidenThe Supervisors of Elections have added two additional polling places.
Read more »

Explained Anomaly Detection in Text Reviews: Can Subjective Scenarios Be Correctly Evaluated?Explained Anomaly Detection in Text Reviews: Can Subjective Scenarios Be Correctly Evaluated?Discover a robust pipeline for detecting and explaining anomalous reviews in online platforms like Amazon.
Read more »

You Asked: Where’s the Bravia, Apple projection, HDR highlightsYou Asked: Where’s the Bravia, Apple projection, HDR highlightsDT Video
Read more »

America’s greatest regional hot dogs: A highly subjective guideAmerica’s greatest regional hot dogs: A highly subjective guideHot dogs are synonymous with summertime across the United States, but the best way to top them remains a major source of debate.
Read more »

How to Choose the Right TV: Quantum Dots, HDR, and More in 2024How to Choose the Right TV: Quantum Dots, HDR, and More in 2024How many ports do you need? What does 4K UHD even mean? Here's everything you need to know.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-04-02 17:56:49