Jamie Raskin suggested that the DOJ should force Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas to recuse themselves from Jan. 6 cases.
should force Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas to recuse themselves from the Jan. 6-related cases they will soon consider.
“The constitutional and statutory standards apply to Supreme Court justices,” he wrote. “The Constitution, and the federal laws under it, is the ‘ explicitly treats Supreme Court justices like other judges: ‘Any justice, judge or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.’ The only justices in the federal judiciary are the ones on the Supreme Court.
The Maryland Democrat also said that other justices on the Supreme Court can raise the matter on their own, giving increased legitimacy to the proceeding. The ranking member of the House Oversight Committee gave a series of historical examples showing why he believes they must act. “But the Constitution and Congress’s recusal statute provide the objective framework of analysis and remedy for cases of judicial bias that are apparent to the world, even if they may be invisible to the judges involved,” he wrote. “This is not really optional for the justices.”Trump v. United States,
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito -- typically in agreement -- split in major CFPB rulingThe Supreme Court's decision this week upholding the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau surprised some court watchers since it pinned Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. against each other -- with Justice Thomas writing the majority opinion and Justice Alito writing the dissent.
Read more »
‘The Book of Clarence’s Religious Comedy Isn’t Just for Non-BelieversLaKeith Stanfield as Clarence in a character poster for The Book of Clarence
Read more »
Samuel Alito has decided that Samuel Alito is sufficiently impartialThat notwithstanding the significant questions that remain about the flag that flew outside the Supreme Court justice’s Virginia home.
Read more »
The strange case of Alito v. AlitoAlito-gate: The justice, his wife, her flags and their ethics.
Read more »
Justice Alito’s Jan. 6 Flags Are a Desperate Wake-Up Call for the DOJAll three branches of our government have so far failed to do anything about the ethics disaster that has befallen the Supreme Court. It’s time for the DOJ to find its spine.
Read more »
SCOTUS Chief Roberts pressured to force Alito recusal ahead of Trump immunity decisionChief Justice John Roberts is facing mounting pressure to make sure Justice Samuel Alito recuses himself from any 2020 election-related cases, including the matter of former President Donald Trump's immunity.
Read more »