The House Judiciary Committee blasted the NFL for abusing its 1960s-era antitrust exemption – urging it to revamp its media model and make it easier for football fans to watch their favorite teams,…
The House Judiciary Committee blasted the NFL for abusing its 1960s-era antitrust exemption – urging it to revamp its media model and make it easier for football fans to watch their favorite teams, according to a scathing new report released Monday.around its broadcast rights deals, calling the model “a house of cards built on an overstretched antitrust exemption,” according to a copy of the heated missive obtained by The Post.
The committee and its chairman Jim Jordan argued that the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 was created to keep games widely available on television and “stave off the league’s impending financial collapse” – but instead it has become a tool to hide more games behind streaming paywalls.
“Today, for consumers to watch broadcast NFL games, they must navigate a complicated and expensive web of television agreements and rules,” the report said – adding that some fans cough up more than $600 to watch their favorite team over an entire season. It specifically took aim at the Sunday Ticket, a $480 sports package that the NFL markets as a special product for the avid football fan who wants to watch as many games as possible.
But the Judiciary Committee claimed over 70% of former Sunday Ticket subscribers said they bought the TV package to “watch my favorite team, which is out of market” – and when asked why they canceled, a whopping 70% said it was because the product was too expensive. It also referenced evidence from an ongoing Sunday Ticket antitrust case, in which a 2024 jury verdict found the NFL violated antitrust law and awarded nearly $5 billion in damages to plaintiffs.
The verdict was overturned by a judge. ESPN had allegedly suggested a Sunday Ticket package priced at just $70 a head, as well as a purchase option that would allow fans to select just certain teams – but the NFL rejected these proposals, leaving fans with fewer choices and inflated prices, according to the report.
The committee also bashed the NFL’s argument that it is consumer-friendly because 87% of its games have “primary distribution” on broadcast television, and 100% of its “local market games” air in their respective regions. Chairman Jim Jordan argued that the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 was created to keep games widely available on television.
“The NFL’s claim that 87 percent of games have ‘primary distribution’ on broadcast television actually means that 87 percent of games are on a broadcast station somewhere in the country,” the report said. “In fact, significantly less than half of the games are actually available to a consumer on broadcast television, depending on the week and geographic area.
” In the meantime, the league’s pricey media rights deals have handed teams over 100 times greater payouts than they received in 1961, even after being adjusted for inflation, according to the report. If the Sports Broadcasting Act was struck down, the NFL would no longer be able to bundle games in sales to broadcasters and streaming partners – meaning some teams would get much bigger deals than others, dooming its revenue-sharing model.into the NFL amid outcry that it has become too pricey and complicated for sports fans to watch their favorite teams.on how the shift from traditional broadcasts to streamers has impacted sports fans — a potential first step before a more serious probe.
To watch all of the top games in 2025, football fanatics needed to shell out monthly fees for Amazon Prime, Netflix, ESPN+ and Peacock – on top of what they’d normally pay for cable. The NFL has argued that streamers have largely begun to replace broadcasters as consumers’ go-to way to watch content, and that they need to meet viewers where they are.
Chairman Jim Jordan argued that the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 was created to keep games widely available on television.
Please follow us on Google to support us Antitrust Law Nfl Playoffs Sports Media
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
10 Most Powerful Fighters in the Invincible Universe, RankedThe Invincible universe is filled with powerful characters, but these ten are the upper echelon of power that nobody else can touch.
Read more »
Ranking the Most Powerful Live-Action Star Wars Villains: From Jabba to PalpatineAn in-depth analysis of the most formidable antagonists in the Star Wars live-action universe, exploring their powers, weaknesses, and legacy. From crime lords like Jabba the Hutt to Sith Lords like Emperor Palpatine, this article ranks the top villains by their threat level and impact on the saga.
Read more »
The Most Powerful Weapons in Anime: From Nulifiers to God-SlayersAnime features an array of incredibly powerful weapons that often define their series. This article explores six of the strongest, including the Inverted Spear of Heaven, Demon-Slayer Sword, Spear of Longinus, Zangetsu, Yoru, and the Dominator, highlighting their unique abilities and significance.
Read more »
US lab discovers new way to build powerful magnets without rare earthsU.S. scientists have developed new AI tools that help in discovery of right materials to make permanent magnets without rare earth elements.
Read more »