Asylum cases can take more than four years to be resolved in immigration court. Since 2000, immigration judges have approved about 30% of the asylum applications filed by people in deportation proceedings.
many immigrants from requesting asylum at the southwest border. The policy, Title 42, was instituted by the Trump administration at the pandemic’s start to restrict immigration and mitigate COVID-19’s spread in the United States.asked former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson what happens after the policy ends. Johnson said the U.S. needed to evaluate"the credible fear standard" and develop a system that"more expeditiously" handles asylum claims.
"It takes six years right now to process an asylum claim once someone has entered this country. And one of the problems is that the bar to qualify initially and establish a case of credible fear is relatively low, something like 70% of migrants qualify who seek it," Johnson said."And the ultimate qualification for asylum, the percentage there, is only about 20%, and it's six years in between.
Under immigration law, immigration officials interview asylum seekers to determine whether they have a credible fear of returning to their home country. If migrants convince authorities that they do have a credible fear, they are let into the country — some people are kept in detention and others are released from immigration custody. They then can apply for asylum and go through the court proceedings.
We found that the likelihood of establishing credible fear is higher than that of actually obtaining asylum, but the specific numbers Johnson cites are off. People can apply for asylum as a defense against deportation. People who are already in the country and not in removal proceedingsThese cases undergo multiple hearings before they’re resolved, and a
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
PolitiFact - Ask PolitiFact: What is independent state legislature theory, and could it create election chaos?On Dec. 7, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Moore v. Harper, a North Carolina redistricting case that centers on the independent state legislature theory. The outcome could upend longstanding practices in elections. Here’s a primer.
Read more »
PolitiFact - Wisconsin schools chief touts silver lining, but scores did not buck national trendThe “Nation’s Report Card” tests a broad sampling of fourth and eighth graders across the nation. Ultimately, Wisconsin did not buck national trends nor did it see any increase compared with the 2019 test scores.
Read more »
PolitiFact - Arizona’s widespread use of mail-in voting and close margins created longer wait for resultsAs election officials in Arizona counted ballots, social media posts falsely suggested that the pace of the count was a sign of fraud. Those posts ignored that counting mail ballots requires additional steps than counting in-person votes.
Read more »
PolitiFact - No, the Arizona governor’s election wasn’t ‘fraudulent’Misinformation about voter fraud in Arizona has spread since the midterm election. Claims that the gubernatorial race was rigged are wrong.
Read more »
Florida leaders misrepresented research before ban on gender-affirming care | PolitiFactEarlier in the year, the Florida Department of Health used a statistic as it advised against medical transitioning for minors. Experts PolitiFact interviewed said the statistic was mischaracterized.
Read more »