From WSJopinion: Nancy Pelosi saw this summer that Adam Schiff’s Take Down Trump Show might be more trouble than it was worth for Democrats. She was right then, writes DanHenninger.
Nancy Pelosi was right the first time. The Democrats shouldn’t have done this. They should not have tried to make the already overwhelmed American public believe that Donald Trump’s umpteenth “norms” violation was a constitutional crisis.
But no, the party’s leftmost elements insisted, and the Beltway press insisted. Mr. Trump had to be impeached. Once he had survived the Republican primaries in 2016 and then beaten Hillary Clinton by tapping into a slice of overlooked voters, most serious people got on with the business...
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Is ISIS Using TikTok to Recruit Young Women?The video app behemoth has taken down dozens of videos supporting the terrorist group.
Read more »
Opinion | Turkey's Erdogan is playing Trump at their White House meetingWith Erdogan adept at speaking Trump’s language and the U.S. having no clear strategy for Turkey, the only deal the president's going to get is a raw one.
Read more »
If Trump won't step up to Turkey's tyrannical leader, Congress must | OpinionPresident Donald Trump is willing to welcome President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to Washington with open arms, but congressional leaders must make it clear that Turkish democracy is vital to U.S. interests.
Read more »
3 reasons why the Trump impeachment hearings are historic, but may not change minds: OpinionNow we are faced with a brand new examination of potential presidential corruption involving President Trump. Public hearings will begin this week in Congress to attempt to figure out what happened and who, if anyone, is responsible. 1) America is in a much different place politically than it was during
Read more »
Opinion | A diplomat breaks down how the impeachment testimony eviscerates TrumpOpinion | Brett Bruen: There are things that US emissaries do that involve “quid pro quos” or “conditions.' The most important difference, though, is when diplomats do so, it is for the benefit of national security, not the president’s political security.
Read more »