From WSJopinion: As the Supreme Court takes up a case about Google’s immunity, maybe it’s time to rethink how a law from the AOL era applies to an AI age that was unimaginable in 1996
Journal Editorial Report: Republicans open up the politics of Twitter. Images: Getty Images Composite: Mark Kelly, a case on the Section 230 immunity enjoyed by internet platforms. This dispute probably won’t produce the blockbuster ruling that critics of Silicon Valley want, but it might illustrate why the questions surrounding Section 230, which will keep coming, are best answered by legislators, not the judiciary.
Under Section 230, internet platforms can’t be “treated as the publisher or speaker” of information provided by their users. If a restaurant is defamed on Yelp or Facebook or Twitter, the party who is legally liable is the author of the malicious review, not the website. This makes sense, given that such services are open bulletin boards where enforcement of standards is done by moderators after the fact.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
New Hampshire Supreme Court will consider challenge to Pamela Smart's life sentenceThe New Hampshire Supreme Court will decide on Tuesday whether to grant Pamela Smart a chance at a hearing that could put her on a path to freedom.
Read more »
New Hampshire Supreme Court will consider challenge to Pamela Smart's life sentenceBEDFORD HILLS, N.Y. — The New Hampshire Supreme Court will decide on Tuesday whether to grant Pamela Smart a chance at a hearing that could put her on a path to freedom.
Read more »
Carrie Severino says Democratic push for Supreme Court ethics bills aims to 'subtract' justicesDays after Democrats proposed legislation to form a new code of conduct specifically for Supreme Court justices, conservative judicial advocates are raising alarms that enacting such legislation could lead to attempts to 'subtract' justices from weighing on key cases before the high court.
Read more »
Bust of racist former Supreme Court Justice removed from U.S. Capitol - New York Amsterdam NewsThe bust of Roger Taney, the racist justice who wrote the infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision that said African Americans were not citizens, has been removed from the United States Capitol.
Read more »
Republican lawmakers urge Supreme Court to overturn Biden's student loan forgiveness planGOP lawmakers filed briefs at the Supreme Court, asking the justices to block Biden's historic student loan forgiveness plan.
Read more »
Wisconsin state Supreme Court election could prove decisive in 2024A little known, off-year election in Wisconsin could determine the crucial swing state’s Electoral College votes in 2024, according to local experts.
Read more »