Ohio Supreme Court Will Decide on Law Limiting Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Youth

United States News News

Ohio Supreme Court Will Decide on Law Limiting Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Youth
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 ClevelandScene
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 139 sec. here
  • 4 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 59%
  • Publisher: 55%

The ACLU of Ohio and others are challenging a state law that prevents transgender youth from starting hormone therapy and puberty blockers.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — DECEMBER 13: Advocates for the trans community protest outside the Senate Chamber and repeatedly shouted “shame” when they heard that lawmakers had passed HB 68 that bans gender-affirming care for transgender youth and bars transgender kids from participating on sports teams, December 13, 2023, at the Statehouse in Columbus, Ohio.

The Ohio Supreme Court will decide the constitutionality of an Ohio law banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth. and a decision will be made in the coming months. The court is made up of six Republicans and one Democratic justice. The law — which prevents transgender youth from starting hormone therapy and puberty blockers — took effect in April 2024 after the Ohio House and the Senate voted to override Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine’s veto. “H.B. 68 prevents parents from accessing treatment that they and their children believe is necessary, that is recommended by the minors’ treating physicians, and that is available for minors with other medical conditions,” said Jordan Bock, arguing on behalf of the plaintiffs in the case. The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Ohio, and the law firm Goodwin filed a lawsuit in 2024 on behalf of two transgender girls and their families. One of the girls was already using puberty-blocking medication and the other was meeting with doctors about starting the process when the lawsuit was filed. “Grace questioned whether dying would allow her to return as a girl,” Bock said. “And Madeline Moe told her parents that she wished she could die and just be reborn. But after being able to live as girls, they thrived.” in August 2024, allowing the gender-affirming care ban to go into effect. The ACLU of Ohio appealed the decision and the Tenth District Court of Appeals ordered a permanent injunction to be entered against the bill in March 2025. “It does not mean there is a right answer in any particular case, but it is the parents that have the right to decide, given the girls’ own circumstances, whether treatment is appropriate,” Bock said. Ohio voters approved in 2011. Ohio’s Solicitor General Marthura Sridharan, however, argued children do not have a constitutional right to obtain gender reassignment procedures. “Parents have discretion to govern the medical treatment of their children,” she said during oral arguments. “Even if there are some benefits to treating gender dysphoria through gender reassignment medications, well, that is not overridden by the significant risks and the significant costs.”“Children would write away their fertility for life,” Sridharan said. “They suffer other serious physical consequences and on top of that, there’s significant known and unknown psychological risks.” Democratic Ohio Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Brunner mentioned how DeWine spent time talking with families of transgender youth before he vetoed the bill. “I’m only bringing that up for the reason that the evidence to the kids showed that there are children who actually harm themselves without the care that they get based upon their gender dysphoria,” she said.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

ClevelandScene /  🏆 383. in US

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Supreme Court to examine birthright citizenship WednesdayU.S. Supreme Court to examine birthright citizenship WednesdayThe U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday in a case to determine to whom the United States can extend birthright citizenship.
Read more »

Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship threatens ‘chaos’ in proving newborns’ statusSupreme Court fight over birthright citizenship threatens ‘chaos’ in proving newborns’ statusJustice Brett Kavanaugh sounded like a fired-up prosecutor last year as he shot off a withering series of nuts-and-bolts questions about how President Donald Trump would carry out his plan to rewrite of the way birthright citizenship has been understood in the United States for more than a century.
Read more »

Much is at stake for The City as Supreme Court takes up birthright citizenshipMuch is at stake for The City as Supreme Court takes up birthright citizenshipJustices will hear case Wednesday that has the potential to affect thousands of residents
Read more »

As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about itAs birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about itThe Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.
Read more »

The birthright citizenship case at the Supreme Court hits close to home for this immigrant motherThe birthright citizenship case at the Supreme Court hits close to home for this immigrant motherAn Argentine emigre in Florida quickly got her newborn son a U.S. passport last year.
Read more »

Supreme Court says state bans on 'conversion therapy' violate counselors' free speech rightsSupreme Court says state bans on 'conversion therapy' violate counselors' free speech rightsCalifornia was the first state to prohibit 'conversion therapy,' which seeks to change the sexual orientation of minors.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-04-01 00:34:17