Nuclear tests could slip past detection if timed with earthquakes, reveals new study

Earthquake News

Nuclear tests could slip past detection if timed with earthquakes, reveals new study
Los AlamosLos Alamos National LaboratoryNuclear
  • 📰 IntEngineering
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 234 sec. here
  • 15 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 132%
  • Publisher: 63%

The scientists have proposed a method to increase the probability of differentiating nuclear tests from earthquakes, other seismic events.

Scientists in the United States have stated that it might be possible for countries to hide their underground nuclear test explosions in the garb of seismic tremors generated by earthquakes.The analysis by the scientists from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in the US can lead to reconsidering an earlier report published in 2012.

The 2012 report concluded that earthquake tremors cannot provide a cover for nuclear testing explosion signals.According to the study by the team at Los Alamos, the digital signal detectors that detect explosions can be confused by the overlap between the waveforms of an explosion and an earthquake.It should be noted that nuclear weapon testing leads to a lot of problems for the environment. The United Nations opened the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty in 1996. It banned all nuclear explosions, whether for military or peaceful purposes. To monitor compliance, its verification regime is designed to detect any nuclear explosion conducted anywhere – underground, under water or in the atmosphere. Study proposes earthquake tremors can hide nuclear test explosionsThe new study by Los Alamos scientists states that the success rate of advanced detectors to identify a 1.7-ton nuclear weapon exploded underground falls to just 37 percent in the case of an earthquake happening within 155 miles distance within 100 seconds.This is a significant dip compared to the 97 percent identification accuracy for the same detector when there are no earthquake tremors in the vicinity.The study sheds light on the topic of explosion masking and how difficult it is to track it because there is very little data available.Moreover, the scientists also found that overlapping waveforms do not just hide explosions, but they can also hide other smaller earthquakes and other seismic events.The masking effect dropped detection to just 16 percent from 92 percent in these situations.“This may mean that we probably underestimate a lot of the low magnitude seismicity that is sourced during a swarm or an aftershock sequence,” Carmichael said as per a report by Phys.Alternatives for better detectionThe scientists have proposed a method to increase the probability of differentiating explosions from earthquakes and other seismic events.For this, they used the data available on explosions and natural seismicity at the Nevada National Security Site.For the new method, the scientists scaled down the amplitude of the explosion data to make it mimic the waveforms from smaller explosions. This scaled-down waveform was then mixed with a bunch of earthquake signals to test if the detectors could differentiate between the two.“Earthquake seismicity sourced near explosions can jam correlation detectors,” they said in the paper.However, identification of a nuclear test explosion is carried out on multiple parameters. The presence of radionuclides in the atmosphere, and some other markers, is also checked to ensure whether it really took place.Therefore, it might not be possible to hide a nuclear test explosion behind an earthquake completely, but it can help improve the ability to detect those using seismic signals.The study has been published in the Journal of the Seismological Society of America.ABSTRACTWe directly test if seismic waveforms that are sourced by earthquakes and that interfere with signals sourced by underground explosions can significantly reduce the probability that such explosion signals are detected. We perform this test with multichannel correlation detectors that use records of ground motion sourced by explosions to detect smaller signals from similar collocated sources. Our test applies these detectors against thousands of signals with a waveform injection method. This method amplitude scales a template waveform over a grid of amplitude values, adds these waveforms into a target data stream at times that create interference with background seismicity, and processes their sum with a correlator. We apply this method to explosion templates sourced in Nevada and recorded by the multichannel array NVAR. Our study compares correlator performance when we deliberately inject templates into earthquake signals relative to baseline operation that processes target waveforms injected into data that is absent of known seismicity. We find that a correlator that uses an explosion‐sourced template and that can reliably detect a 1.7 ton shallowly buried explosion in background noise is unlikely to detect the same event in noisy earthquake interference . This masking remains significant when explosion and earthquake origin times separate by as much as 100 s. We also find that the performance of correlators that use a template sourced by an earthquake is even more degraded and can fall from a 0.92 to a 0.16 detection rate during earthquake swarms. We conclude that earthquake seismicity can mask explosion signals with significant probability and that swarms can also mask significant repeating earthquake seismicity.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

IntEngineering /  🏆 287. in US

Los Alamos Los Alamos National Laboratory Nuclear Nuclear Monitoring Nuclear Test Nuclear Weapon Seismic Data Tremors Underground Nuclear Test US

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

New nuclear fuel recycling, rare earth metals recovery method to boost US energyNew nuclear fuel recycling, rare earth metals recovery method to boost US energyThe localized approach proposed could cut back a lot on the safety risks and costs of handling nuclear fuel.
Read more »

Calls to restart nuclear weapons tests stir dismay and debate among scientistsCalls to restart nuclear weapons tests stir dismay and debate among scientistsMany scientists say “subcritical” experiments and computer simulations make nuclear weapons testing unnecessary.
Read more »

New Google Earth Photos Capture China's Nuclear Submarine ForceNew Google Earth Photos Capture China's Nuclear Submarine ForceChina is expected to expand its submarine force from 60 boats to 65 by this year and 80 by a decade later.
Read more »

China’s secret base hiding 6 nuclear submarines found through Google Earth imagesChina’s secret base hiding 6 nuclear submarines found through Google Earth imagesNew Google Earth imagery reveals six Chinese nuclear submarines at the hidden First Submarine Base near Qingdao.
Read more »

Louisiana joins Utah, Texas in suit on nuclear reactorsLouisiana joins Utah, Texas in suit on nuclear reactorsA lawsuit filed by Texas, Utah, Louisiana and a nuclear startup company targets the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, arguing the lack of nuclear reactor development is by design.
Read more »

New nuclear reactor tests zero in on ghost-like particles tied to dark matter puzzlesNew nuclear reactor tests zero in on ghost-like particles tied to dark matter puzzlesA collaboration of US-based researchers has turned to the PROSPECT-I detector at ORNL in search of the elusive sterile neutrinos.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-04-01 18:00:35