North Carolina Supreme Court Race Remains Contested Weeks After Election

Politics News

North Carolina Supreme Court Race Remains Contested Weeks After Election
North CarolinaSupreme CourtElection
  • 📰 NPR
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 196 sec. here
  • 12 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 106%
  • Publisher: 63%

Jefferson Griffin, the Republican candidate, is challenging over 65,000 votes in his close race against Democratic incumbent Allison Riggs for a seat on the North Carolina Supreme Court. The dispute is heading to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Tory Grimm-Oropesa moved to Charlotte from northern California in 2022. She then voted in two elections without incident. But after voting in November of last year, she received an unusual piece of mail. 'I got a postcard in the mail with a QR code on it that said my ballot was being challenged,' she said. That postcard was from the campaign of Republican Jefferson Griffin , in a contest for a seat on the North Carolina Supreme Court .

After two recounts in the swing state, Griffin is trailing Democratic incumbent Allison Riggs by a miniscule 734 votes out of more than 5.5 million ballots cast.Griffin hasn't pointed to any case of voter fraud, but he is contesting Grimm-Oropesa's vote — along with roughly 65,000 others. His challenge means that a bitter fight over a state high court seat is still working its way through the courts, more than 80 days after Election Day. The next step comes Monday, when the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments, before ultimately deciding whether the case should be decided in federal court or in state court.Meanwhile, Grimm-Oropesa is upset. 'It's not a matter of I did something wrong or I'm trying to cheat in voting,' she said.'I voted in three different elections now, perfectly fine, never had an issue. So I don't understand why this one and just this one result should be thrown out.'Riggs was appointed to the North Carolina Supreme Court in 2023 by then-Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper. She has recused herself from this case, and possibly deciding her own election. But she has publicly criticized Griffin's challenge. In a recent statement, Riggs said Griffin was wasting taxpayer dollars in'a baseless attempt to overturn his electoral loss.'The list of challenged voters includes some elected officials. It also includes Riggs' parents. The contested ballots are in three buckets:A little more than 60,000 of them are due to voters having incomplete registrations. At one point, North Carolina's voter registration forms didn't explicitly say that a driver's license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number were needed. More than 200,000 voters statewide are believed to have missing information.And then roughly 5,500 of the challenged ballots are also from overseas. Those voters didn't show a copy of their photo ID when voting, and Griffin has argued they should be thrown out. These challenged ballots come from just four Democratic-leaning counties in the state. The state Board of Elections had approved rules that didn't require photo ID for overseas ballots. Those rules were then unanimously approved in March by the North Carolina Rules Review Commission, whose 10 members were selected by the Republican leaders of the state House and Senate. And both Republicans and Democrats on the state Board of Elections in December rejected Griffin's push to disqualify those voters.GOP political consultant Paul Shumaker, who advised Griffin's campaign, said it's reasonable for a court to review the decisions made by the elections board and other agencies — even if they were bipartisan. 'Why are we going to have an appointed board be the final determination of the interpretation of our laws? Do we really want that?' he said.'We have judicial review of the legislative process. about judicial of the administrative process and how our elections are handled?' The North Carolina Supreme Court has blocked certification of the election. But last week it said the challenge should first be heard in lower state courts, a setback for Griffin. However Chief Justice Paul Newby, a Republican, appeared to support Griffin's challenge. He also cast doubt over the entire election process.In the ruling, he said Riggs' ability to erase Griffin's lead of 10,000 votes on election night was a'highly unusual course of events.' (It's common in elections for one candidate to appear to be leading and then fall behind as all results are tallied.)Newby wrote:'his case is not about deciding the outcome of an election. It is about preserving the public's trust and confidence in our elections through the rule of law.' The state Board of Elections, which has a Democratic majority, has said the post-Election Day counting of mail ballots and provisional ballots followed state law.As the dispute has dragged on, some Republicans say Griffin has gone too fa

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

NPR /  🏆 96. in US

North Carolina Supreme Court Election Controversy Voter Challenge Jefferson Griffin Allison Riggs

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

North Carolina Supreme Court Election Dispute Heads Back to State CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court Election Dispute Heads Back to State CourtA federal judge has sent a legal battle over a North Carolina Supreme Court election back to the state's highest court, where it has been blocked. The dispute centers around the election between Democratic Associate Justice Allison Riggs and GOP challenger Jefferson Griffin.
Read more »

North Carolina Supreme Court passing for now on ruling if ballots in close race are validNorth Carolina Supreme Court passing for now on ruling if ballots in close race are validThe North Carolina Supreme Court has dismissed a request by the trailing candidate in an close race for a seat on the court to rule now on whether well over 60,000 ballots should be removed from the tally.
Read more »

Trailing Candidate Asks to Throw Out Ballots in Tight North Carolina Supreme Court RaceTrailing Candidate Asks to Throw Out Ballots in Tight North Carolina Supreme Court RaceA candidate narrowly trailing in a North Carolina Supreme Court race has requested the state Supreme Court to invalidate 60,000 ballots, alleging voter irregularities. The outcome of the election remains uncertain as legal challenges continue.
Read more »

North Carolina Supreme Court Blocks Vote Certification in Tight RaceNorth Carolina Supreme Court Blocks Vote Certification in Tight RaceThe North Carolina Supreme Court has intervened in a closely contested race for the state's high court, preventing the certification of the Democratic candidate's victory.
Read more »

North Carolina Supreme Court Blocks Election Certification in Tight RaceNorth Carolina Supreme Court Blocks Election Certification in Tight RaceThe Republican-dominated North Carolina Supreme Court has temporarily blocked the certification of a November election result for one of its own seats. The court's decision allows for a review of legal arguments by trailing GOP challenger Jefferson Griffin, who contends over 60,000 ballots should not be counted. This setback affects Democratic Associate Justice Allison Riggs, who leads by a narrow margin.
Read more »

North Carolina Supreme Court Blocks Election Certification Amid Ballot DisputeNorth Carolina Supreme Court Blocks Election Certification Amid Ballot DisputeThe North Carolina Supreme Court has halted the certification of a November election result for one of its seats. A trailing candidate contends that over 60,000 ballots should not be counted, prompting the court to review the legal arguments.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-12 16:02:33