Researchers search for reliable non-abusive behaviors that may predict future abuse.
A pair of new studies offers insights into the attitudes and behaviors that may predict abuse.Have you had sex with your partner even though you were not in the mood?Does your partner often disregard your reasoning or logic because it does not agree with theirs?Does your partner resent being questioned about how they treat you? If you answered yes to all or most of these questions, then you may be at risk for intimate partner abuse.
in the bushes, the home invader, the terrorist. Unfamiliar people in the neighborhood or at the front door raise our threat antennae. We teach our children to be wary of strangers. Movies and TV shows both capitalize on and propagate this Yet the data are overwhelmingly clear that this"stranger danger" fear is by and large misguided. Whatever violence you encounter in your life is astronomically more likely to come from familiar people—your family, your colleagues, your spouse. The reason most murders are fairly easy to crack is that they are overwhelmingly committed by someone in the victim’s social sphere.Researcher Lynnmarie Sardinha and colleagues of the Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research of the World Health Organization used their organization's vast databasewith over 2 million women from 161 countries and areas, covering 90 percent of the global population of women and girls . They found that: “Globally, 27 percent of ever-partnered women aged 15–49 years are estimated to have experienced physical or sexual, or both,in their lifetime, with 13 percent experiencing it in the past year before they were surveyed. This violence starts early, affecting adolescent girls and young women, with 24 percent of women aged 15–19 years and 26 percent of women aged 19–24 years having already experienced this violence at least once since the age of 15 years.”by Sarah White of the University of London and colleagues looked at 201 studies involving 250,599 women, primarily from high-income countries. They conclude: “Meta-analysis suggested increased odds for all mental health outcomes associated with IPV includingPsychologists have long been interested in identifying warning signs of violence that may help professionals and individuals respond effectively to such threats.. Yet the existing research is based mostly on retroactive interviews with survivors of violence and lacks longitudinal data that would allow us to draw cause-and-effect conclusions. The prevalent assumption that warning signs covary reliably with experiences of violence has not been well tested. Finally, similar behaviors may or may not constitute reliable warning signs, depending on context, frequency, and severity.looking to identify warning signs that may be reliably predictive of intimate partner abuse. In Study 1, the researchers presented participants with a list of 200 abusive and non-abusive thoughts, feelings, and behaviors and asked them to indicate how frequently each item had occurred since they had startedtechniques revealed 17 warning signs that together accounted for 61 percent of the variance in overall abuse. The most powerful were:“I felt like I couldn’t say no to my partner.”The number and frequency of warning signs were also related to the odds of experiencing abuse. As predicted, larger numbers and higher frequencies were more powerfully predictive of abuse. Study 2 used a longitudinal design to explore which warning signs may prospectively predict future violence. First , participants were asked to indicate how frequently each of the 200 abusive and non-abusive items had occurred within their romantic relationship since they began. Six months later , participants were presented with a list of abusive behaviors and asked to report how frequently each behavior had occurred in the interim. Most participants experienced at least one instance of abuse. Analyses found 12 warning signs that prospectively predicted abuse 6 months later, explaining 54 percent of the variance in overall abuse. The most powerful warning signs were:"My partner disregarded my reasoning or logic because it did not agree with theirs";"My partner refused to compromise on an important decision"; and"My partner had mood swings."The authors then conducted an analysis of whether abusive behaviors at Time 1 may predict overall abuse at Time 2. They identified four behavioral predictors that together accounted for 53 percent of the variance in overall abuse. A second analysis combining the four abusive behavior variables and the 12 identified warning signs accounted for 59 percent of the variance in overall abuse . The authors conclude: “Findings suggest that abusive behaviors are the strongest predictors of future abuse, but, to a limited extent, warning signs can indeed predict abuse above and beyond prior experiences of violence.” In this study as well, the number and frequency of warning signs a person experiences are associated with increases in abuse over time.My partner and I had sex, even though I was not in the mood.My partner disregarded my reasoning or logic because it did not agree with theirs.My partner resented being questioned about how they treated mepandemic, which may have affected the participants’ experience. Second, the study was based on self-reports, which are notoriously given to distortion. Third, the samples in both studies were not representative of the general population, with low proportions of men, people of color, anddiverse individuals. Fourth, since similar levels of abuse were found at both time points in Study 2, the warning signs identified in the study were conflated with abuse itself, which muddies their predictive power. Finally, the authors note that “abuse frequency in both studies was relatively low, suggesting that these warning signs may be more indicative of situational couple violence , which is less severe, frequent, and controlling, opposed to coercive controlling violence , which is more frequent, severe, one-sided, and typically perpetrated by men.” Still, the authors conclude: “Our findings are still informative because they identify non-abusive behaviors that on average precede abuse… are associated with abuse… and predict abuse 6 months later.”
Scratch the next story
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
New York/New Jersey chosen to host 2026 World Cup FinalMetLife Stadium in New Jersey will officially host the 2026 World Cup Final, FIFA announced on Sunday.
Read more »
FAR AFIELD: Researchers seek out and study tornadoes and severe weatherOceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) - or NOAA Research - provides the research foundation for understanding the complex systems that support our planet.
Read more »
Researchers develop cluster glass for fluorescence and nonlinear optical propertiesGlass can be synthesized through a novel 'crystal-liquid-glass' phase transformation. Crystalline materials can be fine-tuned for desired properties such as improved mass transfer and optical properties through coordination chemistry and grid chemistry design principles.
Read more »
Researchers 3D-print functional human brain tissueIt's an achievement with important implications for scientists studying the brain and working on treatments for a broad range of neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.
Read more »
Women need less exercise than men for same cardiovascular benefits, researchers findA study published Monday revealed a gender gap in cardiovascular benefits when it comes to exercise.
Read more »
Researchers develop molecules for a new class of antibiotics that can overcome drug resistant bacteriaAbout a decade ago, researchers began to observe a recurring challenge in their research: Some of the compounds they were developing to harness energy from bacteria were instead killing the microbes. Not good if the objective of the project was to harness the metabolism of living bacteria to produce electricity.
Read more »
