Most visitors who responded to the Trump administration’s request to report “negative' portrayals of Americans at U.S. national parks used the opportunity to criticize the effort itself.
Staff with the National Parks Service replace the plaques that were part of the 'Freedom and Slavery in the Making of a New Nation' exhibit at the President's house on February 19, 2026 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
An order by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum last year targeted "inappropriate content" including any signs and exhibits "negative about either past or living Americans or that fail to emphasize the beauty, grandeur, and abundance of landscapes and other natural features.
" The order following one by President Donald Trump on "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" sought to emphasize the achievements of America and splendor of its landscape. The goal, Burgum wrote, was to restore sites to "solemn and uplifting public monuments that remind Americans of our extraordinary heritage, consistent progress toward becoming a more perfect Union, and unmatched record of advancing liberty, prosperity, and human flourishing.
" A watchdog group of librarians, public historians and data experts called Save Our Signs, relying on photo submissions and news reports, has documented at least 59 signs removed or modified. They include signs referring to slavery, climate change, women’s rights and involvement in conservation and Native American history, said Jenny McBurney, a government publications librarian at the University of Minnesota who is part of the group.
Many of the changes were at Philadelphia's Independence National Historical Park, where the administration removed exhibits on the lives of nine people enslaved at the site in the 1790s under George Washington, the first U.S. president. Some of those exhibits were later restored under a judge's order before further work was halted after the administration appealed. More than half the comments showed signs of coordination and were critical of the effort itself. But many others were personally crafted.
The comments come to light as a result of a Sierra Club lawsuit seeking their release. Some commended the parks, including their staff and signage.
"We had a great time learning about the development of this site including the difficult parts of our American story," wrote a visitor to Gateway Arch National Park in St. Louis. "We need those reminders to help us become even better in the future. "Others veered into silliness: "Didn’t see any Bigfeets," wrote a visitor to Washington’s North Cascades National Park.
"Trump’s idea of having Americans call in and snitch on each other ... is straight out of the fascist playbook he’s literally acting like Hitler or Mussolini," wrote one visitor. Some visitors alerted what they saw as inappropriate references to historical figures, including Black leaders, related to race and inclusion philosophies.
A visitor to Missouri's Harry S. Truman National Historic Site flagged an installation they said praised the former president as a "founding father" of diversity, equity and inclusion and a "precursor" advocate of critical race theory, or a way of looking at U.S. history through the lens of racism.
"I came here to see his hat and maybe a piano, not to read about intersectionality and ‘equity frameworks. ’ I nearly choked on my commemorative root beer," the visitor wrote. Another complained that a sign at Virginia's Booker T. Washington National Monument described the Black leader as a "father of DEI and early architect of critical race theory.
" "This sign is blatantly misleading, politically loaded, and clearly designed to push a modern agenda by hijacking a respected historical figure. It’s like naming Paul Revere the first Uber driver because he got around fast," the person said. The Trump administration has been vague about the changes it has made as a result of the program.
"In many cases across the system, flagged materials remain unchanged," an Interior spokesperson said in an emailed statement, while not answering questions about signs or exhibits that are or will be changed. Other locations where signs have been removed or changed include Maine’s Acadia National Park, Wyoming’s Grand Teton National Park, New York City’s Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge and Virgin Islands National Park, according to Save Our Signs.
"We hear from folks all over the country that history matters, that our national parks matter and that this is important to them," McBurney said. The Associated Press contributed to this report. The story is based primarily on an Associated Press analysis of roughly 35,000 public comments submitted to the National Park Service between June 2025 and January 2026 in response to the Trump administration’s request for visitors to report "negative" portrayals of Americans at national parks. This story was reported from Los Angeles.
Please follow us on Google to support usUnited States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Trump Administration Waives Environmental Laws to Build Border Barrier in Big Bend National ParkThe Trump administration has waived dozens of environmental protections to fast-track border wall construction through Big Bend National Park in Texas, sparking widespread condemnation from conservationists and indigenous advocates. The unprecedented move bypasses laws designed to protect wild and scenic rivers, historic sites, and Native American heritage, while data shows the region has low border apprehension rates. Steel bollards are arriving, and a major contract has been given to a Republican-aligned firm. Over 130 groups are fighting the plan, calling it the worst attack on national parks in a century.
Read more »
Mammoth Cave National Park: A World of WonderDiscover the unique combination of above-ground and below-ground features that has earned Mammoth Cave National Park World Heritage and International Biosphere Reserve status.
Read more »
San Diego man survives bear attack while hiking in Montana national parkBoth bones in Crago’s forearm were broken by the bear’s bite, but he said other hikers saved his life.
Read more »
House Committee Rejects Proposal to Block Border Wall in Big Bend National ParkA proposal to bar the use of federal funds for constructing a border wall inside Big Bend National Park failed in the U.S. House Appropriations Committee along party lines. The amendment, introduced by Rep. Henry Cuellar, was opposed by all Republicans and supported by Democrats. It would have prohibited barrier construction in the park and several other border-area sites, but the GOP-controlled committee voted it down 26-34.
Read more »