Elon Musk's promotion of 120-hour workweeks and his expectation for employees at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to follow suit is misguided and potentially harmful. Contrary to popular belief, extensive working hours do not guarantee increased productivity or positive outcomes. Research consistently demonstrates that long hours can lead to employee burnout, stress, and even catastrophic mistakes, especially in sensitive roles handling data critical to millions. This article argues that prioritizing flexibility, results-oriented work, and well-being over long hours fosters a healthier and more productive work environment.
Elon Musk claims he works 120 hours per week and has called for his employees at the Department of Government Efficiency to do the same as they fan out across the federal government. His team, which appears to rely heavily on enthusiastic young men, may share his conviction that long hours are always better.
Musk has gone even further than late nights: He recently claimed he was sleeping at DOGE headquarters in Washington, D.C., a habit he may have picked up from his days at Tesla. There’s just one problem: Musk and his team are wrong. The idea that working extremely long hours leads to increased productivity and positive results is not only outdated, but unfounded. Instead, research clearly shows that working long hours doesn’t make you a better employee. In fact, it can lead employees to struggle or even make catastrophic mistakes. This is concerning no matter what job you’re doing, but it may be of special concern for the Musk team handling sensitive data systems that touch the lives and livelihoods of millions of Americans. Research has shown the damaging effects of this grind ethos on the physical and emotional well-being of employees. In studies by professors Phyllis Moen, Erin Kelly and colleagues, data from professionals revealed that rising time demands led to increased stress and work-life conflict. Further, they found that organizational interventions aiming to increase flexibility and schedule control by focusing on results rather than long hours reduced turnover intentions and work-family conflict while increasing employee satisfaction, health and well-being. Long, inflexible work hours can lead to high turnover, dissatisfaction and negative health outcomes. In extreme cases, it may even lead to suicide. But what about productivity? Are long hours and the collapse of work-life balance just the necessary cost of work success? Here, too, research suggests the answer is no. According to one 2024 study published in Nature, employees who work from home two days per week are just as productive as those who work full time in the office. Professor Nicholas Bloom has found that, far from inhibiting productivity, remote work often improves organizational outcomes. Leaders may fear compromising client or patient satisfaction, but studies have shown that flexibility can actually improve client service and create better long-term outcomes. For example, in her book “Sleeping with Your Smartphone,” professor Leslie Perlow found that when the Boston Consulting Group countered their prevailing 24/7 work culture by offering employees “predicted time off,” not only did employee satisfaction and retention increase, but clients also benefitted from increased team communication and coordination. In my own research, I’ve found that employees will sometimes grind long hours in the office not because it’s required for a good work product, but because this “performance” makes them appear productive. For example, Alyssa, a single 22-year-old management consultant, told me how expectations for excessive in-person work contradict productivity: “Sometimes it’s frustrating too because sometimes your work is done, and then you want to be a productive person at the firm, but you’re kind of sitting around like, ‘Oh, what do I do? Maybe I’ll make work up.’” By valuing long hours and face time, organizations incentivize counterproductive behaviors that symbolize “good” work without necessarily producing high-quality work products. In fact, these performances of appropriate work behavior can actually inhibit productivity and make it more difficult for employees to do their jobs well. Along these lines, professor Erin Reid found through over 100 interviews in a global strategy consulting firm that many professionals — particularly men — “passed” as workaholic superheroes while pretending to work more hours than they actually did. So why are people like Musk so tied to this idea of long in-person hours? This pervasive assumption could be tied to outdated ideals of a masculine “breadwinner” who spends long hours in the office while his wife tends the home. This enduring industrial-era concept relies on an assumption of separate spheres, where workplaces demand excessive hours from their male employees presuming the wives can handle the family’s personal affairs. These norms persist today, even though our workforce has changed dramatically. Because actual work quality can be difficult to measure in the knowledge and service industries, some leaders rely on long hours in the office as the “appropriate” way to measure work quality. This emphasis on process can actually eclipse the emphasis on product; leaders like Musk risk valuing long hours at the expense of work quality. Let’s hope Musk realizes his mistake quickly enough to fix it.
Business Productivity Health ELON MUSK WORK-LIFE BALANCE PRODUCTIVITY EMPLOYEE WELL-BEING REMOTE WORK
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Progressive Congressional Staffers Propose 32-Hour Workweek, Drawing CriticismThe Congressional Progressive Staff Association has suggested a 32-hour workweek for congressional staffers when lawmakers are in their districts, arguing that it would reduce burnout. The proposal has been met with widespread mockery and criticism from lawmakers and political commentators who argue that it is unrealistic and out of touch with the demands of the job.
Read more »
Congressional Progressive Staff Propose 32-Hour WorkweekProgressive staff members working for congressional lawmakers have requested a 32-hour workweek schedule, arguing that it would improve employee retention and working conditions. The Congressional Progressive Staff Association sent a letter to House and Senate leaders outlining their proposal, emphasizing the benefits of a more sustainable work environment.
Read more »
Progressive congressional staffers push for 32-hour workweekHaving a 32-hour workweek on a 'rotating basis' would improve worker satisfaction and retention, the Congressional Progressive Staff Association said Thursday.
Read more »
Congressional Staff Push for 32-Hour WorkweekProgressive staff members in the US Congress are advocating for a 32-hour workweek, arguing that it would improve working conditions, increase retention, and set a positive example for a more sustainable work model.
Read more »
Progressive senators weigh in on prospect of 32-hour workweekProgressive senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders tell FOX Business their feelings about the prospect of a 32-hour workweek, and they are split.
Read more »
Elon Musk says DOGE works 120 hours a weekBusiness Insider tells the global tech, finance, stock market, media, economy, lifestyle, real estate, AI and innovative stories you want to know.
Read more »