Australia is considering bringing court action against Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube after alleging they are not doing enough to keep Australian children younger than 16 off their platforms.
Student dead after shooting teacher at Hill Country College Preparatory High School in Comal ISD, sheriff says15-year-old student shot teacher at Hill Country College Preparatory High School before turning gun on himself, officials sayTwo rounds of storms are possible this week and weekendRead full article: Good news: Rain chances soon! Bad news: It happens over Easter Weekend.
..Classes are canceled at the school Tuesday, March 31WorldFILE - A YouTube sign is shown near the company's headquarters in San Bruno, Calif., Wednesday, March 12, 2025. FILE - A car passes Facebook's new Meta logo on a sign at the company headquarters on Oct. 28, 2021, in Menlo Park, Calif. FILE - A YouTube sign is shown near the company's headquarters in San Bruno, Calif., Wednesday, March 12, 2025. said Tuesday it was considering court against Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube alleging they are not doing enough to keep Australian children younger than 16 off their platforms.eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant on Tuesday released her first compliance report since those laws took effect demanding 10 platforms remove all Australian account-holders younger than 16. While 5 million Australian accounts had been deactivated, a substantial number of Australian children continued to retain accounts, create new accounts and pass platforms’ age assurance systems, the report said. Inman Grant said in a statement her office had “significant concerns about the compliance” of half of those 10 platforms. Her office was gathering evidence against the five that they had not taken “reasonable steps” to prevent young children holding accounts. Courts could order fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars for systemic failures to comply. eSafety would decide on whether to initiate court action against any platform by midyear.Communications Minister Anika Wells said the five criticized platforms were deliberately not complying with Australian law. “Social media platforms are choosing to do the absolute bare minimum because they want these laws to fail,” Wells told reporters. “This is the world-leading law. We’re the first in the world to do it. Of course they don’t want these laws to work because they want that to be a chilling effect on the dozen countries that have come out since Dec. 10 to follow Australia’s step,” she added. eSafety had identified “poor practices” such as platforms allowing unlimited attempts for a user to pass their age assurance methods and prompting the user to try to pass the age assurance method even after they declared themselves underage. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, told The Associated Press it was committed to complying with Australia’s social media ban. “We’ve also been clear that accurately determining age online is a challenge for the whole industry,” the statement said. Snap Inc. said it has locked 450,000 accounts in compliance with the law and continued to lock more every day. “Snapchat remains fully committed to implementing reasonable steps under the legislation and supporting its underlying goal of improving online safety for young Australians,” a Snap statement said. TikTok declined to comment on Tuesday and Alphabet Inc., which owns YouTube and Google, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Lisa Given, an information sciences expert at RMIT University in Melbourne, said she expected the courts will decide whether platforms have taken “reasonable steps” to exclude young children. “If a tech company has said: look, we put in age assurance, we’ve done all these steps. That’s reasonable. Even though the aged assurance technologies are flawed, whose fault is that? Should they be held accountable for a piece of technology that is not 100% and likely not going to be 100% foolproof any time soon?” Given said.has filed one of two constitutional challenges to the social media ban in the Australian High Court. The other was filed byBoth suits claim the law is unconstitutional because it infringes on Australia’s implied freedom of political communication. A prelimary hearing is set for May 21 when the court will set a date for oral arguments, Reddit said Tuesday.California-based Reddit Inc.’s suit filed in the High Court follows a case filed last month by Sydney-based rights group Both suits claim the law is unconstitutional because it infringes on Australia’s implied freedom of political communication. Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.No active threat on campus at Hill Country Prep High School in BulverdeCold front is here bringing gusty winds and cooler temperaturesAdam Caskey has your Weather Authority cold front forecastBank teller and police officer help stop a scamFamily reacts to guilty verdict in Christopher Preciado trialCastle Hills police department says the armed suspect shot this morning has diedRecords show New Braunfels ISD pulling, restricting more books than it has publicly listed74 year old woman hit crossing South General McMullenNew emissions test could cost Bexar County vehicle ownersSan Antonio attorney admits stealing over half a million dollars from children's inheritance.
Lisa Given Technology Anika Wells World News
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Meta and YouTube fined $3 million for harming mental healthIn a landmark trial, social media giants Meta and YouTube were found negligent and ordered to pay for harming a user's mental health. The decision could force major changes in how social platforms work
Read more »
YouTube staffers deliberately aimed for 'viewer addiction,' killed safety tools for kids: court docsToday's Business Headlines: 03/27/26
Read more »
Meta, YouTube verdict could trigger cascade of social media lawsuits: expertA California jury found Meta and YouTube liable this week for creating an addictive product that harmed the mental health of a young woman, ordering the two companies to pay $6 million in damages.
Read more »
TikTok Sparks Debate: What's Appropriate Attire in Child-Centric Environments?A viral TikTok video raises questions about adult attire in family-friendly settings, sparking a broader discussion on societal expectations and the balance between personal expression and the well-being of children. The creator argues for respecting unwritten social norms, advocating for a distinction between adult and child-centered spaces.
Read more »
Australia says 5 social media platforms aren't fully complying with age lawAustralia is considering bringing court action against Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube after alleging they are not doing enough to keep Australian children younger than 16 off their platforms. Australia banned young children from holding accounts on 10 social media platforms in December.
Read more »
Meta, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube aren't fully complying with child account ban, Australia saysAustralia is considering bringing court action against Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube after alleging they are not doing enough to keep Australian children younger than 16 off their platforms.
Read more »