Mamdani’s proposal to shift control of officer discipline from the commissioner to the CCRB is the equivalent of taking the power to sentence convicted felons away from judges and giving it to an u…
Mamdani is unwilling to acknowledge that the CCRB is notorious among rank-and-file officers, who understandably perceive it as hostile to police.Between the random subway murders, road-blocking protests and the still-fresh memories of the 2020, ’21 and ’22 crime spikes, many of us are paying close attention to the public-safety proposals in the race for New York City mayor.
So far, there’s little for those of us concerned with controlling crime and disorder to be excited about. But more than a few ideas are downright terrifying.on matters of police officer discipline away from the NYPD’s commissioner and give it to the notoriously anti-cop Civilian Complaint Review Board. Currently, once the CCRB substantiates a complaint against a member of the NYPD, it makes a recommendation for sanctioning the alleged misconduct. Most of the time, the police commissioner takes its recommendation — but in about a quarter of those cases, she will exercise her prerogative as chief executive to deviate from the recommendation.NYC police union leader calls out Zohran Mamdani for his staffer’s anti-cop slightThis makes complete sense, given her proximity to the issues that CCRB members can never fully appreciate from afar. There are other reasons not to upend this dynamic. Chief among them: Such a decision would completely undermine the chain of command core to the department’s proper functioning. The question is one of incentives that shift depending on who department personnel will ultimately answer to. Mamdani’s proposal would incentivize officers in the field to make tactical decisions keeping the potential response of the CCRB in mind — when instead those decisionsreflect the directives, goals and preferences communicated by the duly appointed police commissioner. Subordinating the supervisory authority of a department’s chief executive to that of an unelected board with unaligned, if not completely different, interests is a recipe for disorganization, not success.simply does not share the goals of the police commissioner, whose top priority is maintaining order and keeping the public safe by controlling crime. This is key, because there will once again come a time when the commissioner will find herself under immense political pressure to discipline or even fire an officer whose controversial actions looked bad on camera but nevertheless reflected good faith. The NYPD boss is far better positioned to understand and weigh the tradeoffs involved, and therefore more likely to make necessary, if unpopular, choices. The members of the CCRB have no incentive to resist political pressure, because ultimately they won’t be held accountable for the crime problems that might stem from disciplinary decisions that disincentivize the proactive, data-driven enforcement that’s delivered significant crime reductions of the last two years. One effect of creating such a dynamic — intended or not — will be to make the job of police commissioner extremely unattractive to highly talented executives like Jessica Tisch, whom New York City simply cannot afford to lose. We certainly would not be able to recommend in good faith taking on the commissioner’s role under such circumstances. Mamdani, moreover, is unwilling to acknowledge that the CCRB is notorious among rank-and-file officers, who understandably perceive it as hostile to police. After all, six of the board seats are appointed by the City Council and the public advocate, who’ve shown great animosity toward police.Officers’ perception of the CCRB will almost certainly impact morale and could meaningfully dissuade them from being proactive, if willing to serve at all. Mamdani’s proposal to shift control of officer discipline from the commissioner to the CCRB is the equivalent of taking the power to sentence convicted felons away from judges and giving it to an unelected board dominated by criminal-defense attorneys.William J. Bratton twice served as NYPD commissioner. Rafael A. Mangual is the Nick Ohnell fellow for the Manhattan Institute’s Policing & Public Safety Initiative. Views expressed are those of the authors and not their employers.Scooter-riding thieves break into Louvre, swipe priceless Napoleon jewels in brazen heist: 'An intolerable humiliation'
City Council Civilian Complaint Review Board Crime Jessica Tisch NYC Mayoral Election 2025 Nypd Police Public Advocate Public Safety Zohran Mamdani
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Zohran Mamdani’s Chances of Winning Change After Bruising Cuomo DebateThe three candidates clashed over a range of topics, including crime, housing, transportation and the recent Gaza ceasefire deal.
Read more »
Stefanik doubles down on jihadist claims as Mamdani shifts stance on HamasRep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) doubled down on her characterization of Zonhran Mamdani as a 'jihadist.'
Read more »
Stefanik doubles down on jihadist claims as Mamdani shifts stance on HamasRep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) doubled down on her characterization of Zonhran Mamdani as a 'jihadist.'
Read more »
Stefanik doubles down on jihadist claims as Mamdani shifts stance on HamasRep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) doubled down on her characterization of Zonhran Mamdani as a 'jihadist.'
Read more »
Stefanik doubles down on jihadist claims as Mamdani shifts stance on HamasRep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) doubled down on her characterization of Zonhran Mamdani as a 'jihadist.'
Read more »
Why Power Brokers Got Everything Wrong About Zohran MamdaniFrank Rich writes about why the Democratic Party, the New York Times, and the political donor class got Zohran Mamdani’s rise in the NYC mayor race so wrong.
Read more »