The foreman of the jury that convicted former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan on 10 counts says the case involved 'government overreach' and that the evidence wasn't as solid as it seemed.
The foreman of the jury that convicted former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan on 10 counts says the case involved ' government overreach ' and that the evidence wasn't as solid as it seemed. In an interview with FOX 32 Chicago, Tim Nessner said the jurors struggled to reach their verdicts, ultimately convicting Madigan on 10 counts, acquitting him and co-defendant Mike McClain on seven, and failing to reach a verdict on 12 other counts. Nessner led the jury through 11 days of deliberation.
He said the panel was exhausted on the eve of the verdict, leading them to break for the night before returning the next morning to finalize their decisions. According to Nessner, the jury leaned toward acquittal on many charges where they ultimately couldn’t reach a verdict, including a racketeering count. He expressed skepticism about the evidence. 'There was certainly a possibility there was something dirty going on, but I didn’t see the evidence to really get me over that hill.' Nessner noted that some charges, particularly those related to Madigan’s recommendation of government mole Danny Solis for a state board position, were easier for the jury to agree on. 'There was overwhelming evidence that Solis was a dirty operator, and Madigan should’ve been aware of that. The mere entertaining him for a state board was a disservice to Illinois. But I didn’t feel great about voting a guilty verdict on that. We had to do it based on the jury instructions given to us and how the law was interpreted,' Nessner said. Despite the 10 convictions, Nessner expressed conflicted feelings about the fairness of the trial. 'I think it’s unfortunate,' he said. 'It’s a scenario of overreach in my mind. That old saying, if you throw enough things against the wall, something will stick—and that seems to be the case here. Sometimes people do illegal things. I never said they were even bad things. In some ways, Madigan seemed to be a victim of being brought up in the old patronage system.' Madigan and his legal team are likely to pursue appeals
MIKE MADIGAN JURY FOREMAN GOVERNMENT OVERREACH ILLINOIS POLITICS CORRUPTION TRIAL
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Michael Madigan Corruption Trial: Jury Begins DeliberationsA federal jury has begun deliberating in the corruption trial of former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. Prosecutors allege Madigan used his powerful position for personal gain and to enrich himself and his allies. Madigan denies all wrongdoing.
Read more »
Jury deliberations begin in Michael Madigan corruption trialAfter more than three months, the fate of former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan is now in the hands of a jury.
Read more »
Jury begins deliberations in former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan's corruption trialMadigan faces a 23-count indictment in federal court, charging him with racketeering conspiracy, bribery, wire fraud, and attempted extortion.
Read more »
Madigan Corruption Trial Heads to JuryThe trial of former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan and his longtime confidant Mike McClain has reached its conclusion, with jurors beginning deliberations on charges of racketeering, conspiracy, bribery, and wire fraud. Prosecutors allege Madigan used his political influence to enrich himself and others, while the defense maintains his innocence. The case, stemming from a years-long investigation, centers on allegations of quid pro quo deals involving legislative favors and jobs at ComEd in exchange for political support.
Read more »
Madigan Jury Begins Deliberations After Months-Long TrialAfter a lengthy trial filled with recordings and testimonies, the jury has begun deliberations in the case of former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan and his co-defendant, Mike McClain. The jury must now decide on charges of bribery and racketeering stemming from allegations that Madigan engaged in criminal activity for personal gain and political allies.
Read more »
Jury Delivers Partial Verdict in Michael Madigan Corruption TrialA jury has reached a decision on some counts in the corruption trial of former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. While unable to reach a consensus on all charges, the jury declared a verdict on 17 counts. Federal prosecutors will accept the verdict on these counts. The jury continues deliberations on the remaining charges. Madigan, who served 50 years in the state legislature, is accused of using his influence for personal gain.
Read more »