Letters to the Editor
Readers remarked on the Supreme Court immunity ruling; called for stronger city business ethics; supported the death penalty; and weighed in again on the presidential debate.Re: “Justices: Official actions immune — Court rules 6-3 that former U.S. presidents have broad protection from prosecution,” Tuesday news story.
’ opinion is wise and council member Omar Narvaez is wrong in thinking that a one-year prohibition on doing business with the city after serving on a committee is too strong a rule for committee members.As you noted, these committees have huge influence on the council, and it is better to dilute the relationship by at least a year. If it were up to me, the council, which is way more powerful, should be subject to a two-year ban on doing business with or representing anyone in front of the city.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Letters to the Editor — Energy, immunity, animals on the Fourth, debateLetters to the Editor
Read more »
Supreme Court rules in favor of Trump immunity: Letters to the Editor — July 3, 2024Today's Video Headlines
Read more »
Immunity Corrupts. Absolute Immunity Corrupts AbsolutelyTrump benefits from SCOTUS ruling not only that certain conduct is immune from prosecution, but also that any evidence related to such conduct may not enter the court’s analysis.
Read more »
In letters, texts and posts, Jan. 6 victims react to Supreme Court ruling on Trump immunityMany of the victims and the families of those who were attacked in the Jan. 6, 2021, siege of the Capitol are sharing their frustration and anger with the Supreme Court.
Read more »
Letters to the Editor — Glum Texans, abortion, Hunter Biden’s trial, death rowLetters to the Editor
Read more »
Letters to the Editor — Church-state, death penalty, homeless, abortion, Cornyn, VP slotsLetters to the Editor
Read more »