Lawsuit by Attorney General Ken Paxton’s accusers can continue, Texas Supreme Court rules

United States News News

Lawsuit by Attorney General Ken Paxton’s accusers can continue, Texas Supreme Court rules
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 KVUE
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 42 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 63%

The whistleblower lawsuit returns to a Travis County trial court for action.

The all-Republican Supreme Court on Friday rejected Paxton’s request to dismiss the lawsuit after the case had been on pause pending a possible settlement with the whistleblowers. The decisions came four days after the whistleblowers asked the court to reinstate the case — and about two weeks after Paxton was acquitted in his impeachment trial before the Texas Senate.

Four whistleblowers sued the attorney general's office in 2020 for wrongful termination and retaliation after they reported Paxton to the FBI, alleging he abused his office to help a friend and donor, Nate Paul. They almost settled with the attorney general’s office for $3.3 million earlier this year — until Texas House investigators, concerned about using taxpayer dollars for the settlement, started probing the lawsuit’s claims and recommended Paxton’s impeachment.

The series of events effectively froze the case at the Texas Supreme Court. But on Monday, the whistleblowers to announce that they were asking the high court to jump start their case in light of Paxton’s acquittal. “The political trial is over, and it’s time for the case to return to a real court,” whistleblower Blake Brickman said Monday.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

KVUE /  🏆 244. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Lawsuit by Attorney General Ken Paxton’s accusers can continue, Texas Supreme Court rulesLawsuit by Attorney General Ken Paxton’s accusers can continue, Texas Supreme Court rulesThe whistleblower lawsuit, which argues that four senior staffers were improperly fired in retaliation for reporting Paxton to the FBI, returns to a Travis County trial court for action.
Read more »

Lawsuit by Attorney General Ken Paxton’s accusers can continue, Texas Supreme Court rulesLawsuit by Attorney General Ken Paxton’s accusers can continue, Texas Supreme Court rulesThe whistleblower lawsuit, which argues that four senior staffers were improperly fired in retaliation for reporting Paxton to the FBI, returns to a Travis County trial court for action.
Read more »

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to sue Yelp for 'misleading' disclaimers on pregnancy crisis centersTexas Attorney General Ken Paxton to sue Yelp for 'misleading' disclaimers on pregnancy crisis centers“Yelp cannot mislead and deceive the public simply because the company disagrees with our state’s abortion laws,' said Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Read more »

Whistleblower lawsuit against Ken Paxton to move forward, Texas’ top court rulesWhistleblower lawsuit against Ken Paxton to move forward, Texas’ top court rulesThe whistleblower lawsuit against Attorney General Ken Paxton is not going away after the Texas Supreme Court ruled it can move forward in a Travis County...
Read more »

Lawsuit filed by Ken Paxton’s whistleblowers can move forward, Texas Supreme Court rulesLawsuit filed by Ken Paxton’s whistleblowers can move forward, Texas Supreme Court rulesJ. Mark Penley, Ryan Vassar, David Maxwell and James Blake Brickman have alleged they were terminated in violation of the state’s whistleblower protection laws.
Read more »

Mel Tucker attorney wants Michigan State to preserve documents for potential lawsuitMel Tucker attorney wants Michigan State to preserve documents for potential lawsuitAn attorney for fired Michigan State football coach Mel Tucker wants university officials and representatives to preserve all documents related to the investigation, citing a potential lawsuit against the university.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-15 06:36:54