Tim Vandenack covers immigration, multicultural issues and Northern Utah for KSL. He worked several years for the Standard-Examiner in Ogden and has lived and reported in Mexico, Chile and along the U.S.-Mexico border.
SALT LAKE CITY — When budget time rolls around each year, some property owners are taken by surprise when they learn, late in the process, that local officials are mulling a tax hike, says Utah Rep. Karen Peterson.
Indeed, many attended truth-in-taxation hearings last August — when cities, school districts and other local taxing entities formally took feedback for tax hikes proposed in 2025 — wondering what they missed, she said Tuesday. Some "felt like the decision had already been made, and I think in many instances, it had because of the process we had," she said.Of course, tax hikes rub many the wrong way every year, not just last year, and to alleviate some of the surprise, Peterson sponsored legislation during the 2026 session to add transparency to the process of implementing property tax hikes. HB236 passed unanimously in both the Utah House and Utah Senate, and Gov. Spencer Cox on Monday signed the bill into law.One of the key goals of the measure is to better engage the public in the process taxing entities follow in deciding whether to boost taxes, long before a decision is made. "This just requires that they bring the public in earlier to the conversation when there's going to be a tax increase," said Peterson, a Republican from Clinton.Parallel to that, she said, by involving the public earlier in the process of debating and considering whether to boost taxes, the law aims to bolster the sense that increases aren't "a forgone conclusion."The new law builds on SB202, passed in 2025, and SB29, passed in 2024, which also placed new guardrails on the process of boosting taxes. The new guidelines outlined in those measures were behind the decision of the Utah State Tax Commission to deny tax hikes sought in 2025 by 35 taxing entities.Here are some of the provisions of HB236, backed by the Utah Taxpayers Association, a tax watchdog group:It requires local taxing entities to formally notify constituents in May, during the budget-crafting process, if tax hikes are under consideration for the coming year's spending plan. Officials are also required to offer an estimate of the increase under consideration and how it would impact an average household. The possibility must be included on the agenda for a public meeting and formally discussed at the meeting.By the end of June, cities, fire districts, school districts, special districts and other entities mulling tax hikes must create "a budget impact statement" that p
Traffic Weather Sports Classifieds Cars Jobs Homes Television Radio Salt Lake Utah Local Politics Finance Local Law
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
New Mexico jury finds Meta violated consumer protection law at trial about child safetyA New Mexico jury finds that social media conglomerate Meta is harmful to children’s mental health and in violation of state consumer protection law.
Read more »
New Mexico jury finds Meta violated consumer protection law at trial about child safetyA New Mexico jury finds that social media conglomerate Meta is harmful to children’s mental health and in violation of state consumer protection law.
Read more »
New Mexico jury finds Meta violated consumer protection law at trial about child safetyJurors sided with state prosecutors who argued that Meta — which owns Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp — prioritized profits over safety.
Read more »
New Mexico jury finds Meta violated consumer protection law at trial about child safetySANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — A New Mexico jury found Tuesday that social media conglomerate Meta violated state consumer protection law in failing to disclose the
Read more »
New Mexico jury finds Meta violated consumer protection law at trial about child safetyA New Mexico jury finds that social media conglomerate Meta is harmful to children’s mental health and in violation of state consumer protection law.
Read more »
New Mexico jury finds Meta violated consumer protection law at trial about child safetyJurors sided with state prosecutors who argued that Meta prioritized profits over safety.
Read more »