The most important stories for you to know today
LAPD complaint form informs complainants of this in bold font and all capital letters. The city and the union representing its police officers have been fighting over that language, and the argument has reached the California Supreme Court.
The city of Los Angeles says the warning is a deterrent to people who would otherwise file a complaint, and violates the First Amendment by chilling free speech. The city also asserts that the form constitutes “viewpoint discrimination” — that is, it punishes false complaints against police officers, but not false statements made by police officers or witnesses in the same situation. The Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union representing LAPD officers, argues the form is constitutional and necessary to prevent false complaints that would tie up an officer’s career.But the Legislature was concerned with “less ethical citizens maliciously file false allegations of misconduct against officers in an effort to punish them for simply doing their jobs,” according to a federal court decision years later.At the LAPD, officials went further, demanding that complainants affirm, in bold font and all capital letters, that they understand the potential penalties. "It is against the law to make a complaint that you know to be false," the LAPD form reads in all caps."If you make a complaint against an officer knowing that it is false, you can be prosecuted on a misdemeanor charge." More than 30 years later, the city and the union representing its police officers are still fighting over that language, and the argument has reached the California Supreme Court. The city of Los Angeles says the warning is a deterrent to people who would otherwise file a complaint, and violates the First Amendment by chilling free speech. The city also asserts that the form constitutes “viewpoint discrimination” — that is, it punishes false complaints against police officers, but not false statements made by police officers or witnesses in the same situation. The Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union representing LAPD officers, argues the form is constitutional and necessary to prevent false complaints that would tie up an officer’s career.with the U.S. Justice Department from 2001 to 2013. During that time, people could make complaints anonymously, either in-person, by phone, by mail, by fax or in an email. They would not be compelled to sign anything. But in 2017, four years after the consent decree ended, the police officers’ union filed a lawsuit that demanded the reinstatement of the signed complaint form. The matter went to both state and federal courts. The California courts mostly agreed with the officers’ union. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals This, the city said in a brief filed with the California Supreme Court, left it in an “impossible position” where it had to violate one court’s decision to enforce the other decisions.The majority of California Supreme Court justices appeared to take a dim view of the city’s argument that the warning is unconstitutional. Associate Justice Goodwin Liu said other, similar warnings are a rote part of the justice system. “Do perjury laws deter witnesses?” he asked a lawyer for the city of Los Angeles, referring to the law thatThe lawyer, Michael Walsh, responded that other factors like negative publicity could deter witnesses from coming forward, but Liu replied that that’s not the fault or issue of the perjury laws. The California Supreme Court justices also posed hypotheticals. What if, Associate Justice Joshua Groban asked, a person complained to the LAPD that an officer did not refer to them politely. That, he said, could be a truthful complaint, but the conduct isn’t a violation of LAPD rules — could that complainant be prosecuted?“If the person utterly believes this to be true, then it can’t knowingly be false,” Morguess said. “I think the statute needs to be crystal clear,” Groban said. “If it’s not, we’ve got a real chilling problem.”“It takes enormous bravery for Californians who have experienced police misconduct to go forward and speak truth to power,” said Matt Nguyen, a lawyer representing a coalition of groups that filed friend-of-the-court briefs in support of the city of Los Angeles. “And yet when they go to do so, every single member of the public is forced to confront this all-caps warning that virtually screams at them.”“Even if that is the case,” he said, “is that very discouraging, do you think?”
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
LAPD releases video from shooting of Weezer bassist's author wifeToday's Video Headlines: 04/26/2025
Read more »
LAPD Releases Footage From Shooting Involving Weezer Bassist’s Wife Jillian LaurenThe police released body camera and surveillance video as well as audio from the 911 dispatch conversation from the incident earlier this month.
Read more »
LAPD Releases Footage From Shooting Involving Jillian Lauren, Weezer Bassist’s WifeLos Angeles police released video from the shooting involving Jillian Lauren, wife of a Weezer's Scott Shriner.
Read more »
Wife of Weezer Bassist Arrested After Shooting at LAPD Officers Caught on VideoPolice and security footage show Jillian Shriner, wife of Weezer bassist, brandishing a handgun and firing before being shot by officers. Despite the video evidence, the District Attorney's office has yet to file formal charges.
Read more »
LAPD Shares Body Cam Footage of Weezer Bassist's Wife's ArrestLAPD released body camera footage showing Jillian Lauren's police standoff and arrest after she pointed a gun at officers outside her home
Read more »
LAPD increases patrols at East Hollywood Thai festival following deadly Vancouver attackThe LAPD said it decided to increase patrolling around Sunday's Thai New Songkran Festival in East Hollywood, citing 'sufficient resources.'
Read more »