Councilman Tim McOsker, who spearheaded the ballot proposal with Councilman Hugo Soto-Martinez, requested the item return to council next Tuesday. As a result of a 7-7 split, his motion failed.
The Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday, July 30, passed on the opportunity to override Mayor Karen Bass’ recent veto of a proposed ballot measure intended at changing the disciplinary process for LAPD officers —including expanding the chief’s powers to fire officers for misconduct.
On July 15, Bass vetoed the council’s approval of a measure placing the matter on the November ballot, but the 15-member council could have reversed the veto by lassoing 10 votes in favor of an override. Returning from its monthlong summer recess Tuesday, council members considered extending their discussion whether to override or allow the mayor’s veto to Aug. 14, which would have left the proposal off the November ballot, as there is an Aug. 9 deadline to place measures on the November ballot. An override would mean that voters could check in on the proposal this November. But the council did not delay the item, and failed to override it, meaning voters will not get another chance to weigh in until 2026. Councilman Tim McOsker, who spearheaded the ballot proposal with Councilman Hugo Soto-Martinez, requested the item return to council next Tuesday. As a result of a 7-7 split, his motion failed. While Soto-Martinez assisted with the proposal, he ultimately opposed it due to alterations introduced by McOsker as it would create a two-tiered disciplinary system. Soto-Martinez called for the mayor’s veto to be “received and filed” — which was approved in a 9-5 vote with council members McOsker, Bob Blumenfield, Kevin de Leon, John Lee, and Monica Rodriguez opposing.Los Angeles City Council member Tim McOsker “I was disappointed in the veto itself,” McOsker told City News Service. “My disappointment continues with a decision to receive and file, which is essentially accepting the veto on the first day that they possibly could.” He added, “My disappointment stems from our opportunity to do the first significant reform of the discipline system in many, many years, and the opportunity to put in front of the voters the question as to whether the next chief should have the power to fire officers for serious misconduct. I think that power, that authority for the chief, would be a significant reform and opportunity to make the department more accountable than what it is today.” The ballot proposal intended to expand the chief’s ability to fire officers for serious misconduct, and also change the composition of the department’s Board of Rights. Currently, the chief can only recommend that an officer be terminated — but ultimately the decision is left to the Board of Rights, a three-member panel that serves as a quasi-judicial body. The proposal sought to allow the chief to fire officers outright for engaging in sexual misconduct, fraud, excessive force or abuse on duty, among other violations. The proposal intended to change the makeup of the Board of Rights from two sworn officers and one civilian member to one sworn officer and two civilian members. It would also repeal an option that gives officers facing disciplinary action the right to request an all-civilian Board of Rights panel. On July 2, the council voted 11-3 to approve the proposed ballot measure, with Councilman Marqueece Harris-Dawson absent during the vote. Council members Hugo Soto-Martinez, Nithya Raman and Eunisses Hernandez voted against it.In a letter to the council at the time, Bass said the proposed measure would create “bureaucratic confusion” and result in “ambiguous direction and gaps.” “I look forward to working with each of you to do a thorough and comprehensive review with officers, the department, and other stakeholders to ensure fairness for all. The current system remains until this collaborative review is complete and can be placed before the voters,” Bass added. Mcosker told City News Service that the mayor has indicated that she would like to work with the council on comprehensive reform of the discipline system because her belief, which the councilman agreed with, is that it’s broken and ineffective from top to bottom. “I applaud the mayor for getting involved at this stage of the process, and I will use whatever role I have to advance that,” McOsker said. City officials say there may be other ways to enact certain provisions outlined in the measure — specifically to repeal Charter Amendment C via ordinance. Charter Amendment C established the Board of Rights current composition, which data shows has resulted in more lenient outcomes for officers accused of violating department policies or laws. The city could also prepare to expand the chief of police’s authority to fire officers through a City Charter amendment, but that too would come before the voters in 2026. In June, as part of the council’s deliberations on the proposal, LAPD leadership warned the measure would create a two-tier disciplinary system in which some officers would be fired by the chief and others would face Board of Rights hearings.Commissioner Rasha Gerges Shield took issue with establishing binding arbitration and described it as “controversial” to resolve disciplinary cases. Commissioner Maria Calanche expressed frustration in that the board “couldn’t weigh in.” A representative of the Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union representing the department’s rank-and-file, told City News Service on Monday that the union supports the proposal, but in light of the mayor’s veto, it will be “evaluating the best path forward.”LA police find body in Metro Red Line tunnel near North HollywoodMetro gets rolling on San Fernando Valley light rail constructionWe tried to get fast food meals for $10; here’s what happened‘General Hospital’ actress sentenced for wrong-way DUI crash on 134 Freeway in PasadenaHarris, Trump statistically tied in nationwide pollHurricane center ups chances to 60% tropical system could form, threaten Florida
Please follow us on Google to support us United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Sony ULT Wear Headphones Review: How Much Bass Is Too Much Bass?I cover the consumer tech beat for Forbes, focusing on the Asian and European markets. I am an independent tech journalist who has been a part of the industry since 2015. Currently, I'm also contributing to Digital Trends and CNET, with bylines in many more legacy publications. When not reading or writing, I can be found napping.
Read more »
City Council approves commission to look into Aurora getting a sister cityThe nine-member commission will be involved in the initial stages of finding a sister city, including facilitating the early communication between elected officials of both cities.
Read more »
San Diego City Council confirms Robert Logan as city's next fire chiefThe San Diego City Council officially confirmed the appointment of Robert Logan II as the city's next San Diego Fire-Rescue Department Chief.
Read more »
Same fish, new name: Largemouth bass are now Florida bassThe rollercoaster is the 10th one that has opened at the Tampa amusement park, and is the first one with a musical soundtrack.
Read more »
Mobile City Council expected to say YES to Amtrak as representatives plan visit to cityMobile Council expected to say yes to Amtrak as representatives plan visit to city'I've been on the commission for over 6 years, the Southern Rail Commission, a
Read more »
LA City Council faces possible tussle with Mayor Bass over LAPD disciplineOn July 2, the council voted 11-3 to approve a proposed ballot measure. On July 15, Bass broke out her veto pen.
Read more »