The Supreme Court heard arguments in Watson v. Republican National Committee on Monday.
Jackson noted during oral arguments in the case on Monday that election practices have changed over time, which she said undermines the idea that there was ever a consistent practice across all states.
“It's been changing throughout the course in a way that undermines the notion that there was one consistent practice first of all, or that Congress's law, the meaning of Election Day in the federal statutes, somehow was tied to what the state's practices were about that,” Jackson said. “I mean, I think this is your original point that there were lots of different practices and so to the extent we're saying, ‘oh, you could only look at Election Day in the federal statute to mean exactly what the states were doing back at that time.’ This imperils a lot of different things, not just post-Election Day ballot deadlines.”’s conservative justices largely seemed skeptical about a Mississippi law allowing late-arriving mail-in ballots to be counted in federal elections. Liberal justices indicated they would uphold state laws with post-If the court strikes down the Mississippi law, the decision could affect voters in 13 other states and the District of Columbia, all of which have grace periods for mail-in ballots. States that have later deadlines for ballots from military and overseas voters also could be impacted.on Monday. The case centers on whether federal law sets a single Election Day that requires ballots to be both cast by voters and received by state officials.asked about the appearance of fraud in situations where “a big stash of ballots” that arrive late “radically flipped” an election. States with post-Election Day deadlines for mail-in ballots include Alaska, California, Texas, New York and Illinois. Lawyers for the Republican and Libertarian parties, as well as President Donald Trump’s administration, are asking the justices to affirm an appeals court ruling striking down Mississippi’s law. The state law allows ballots to be counted if they arrive within five business days of the election and are postmarked by Election Day. Both conservative and liberal justices expressed concerns about other legal issues that could arise from the ruling. Justice Neil Gorsuch said that if the court upholds post-Election Day deadlines, ballots could be received two months after the election. Justice Elena Kagan said the argument used to challenge post-Election Day deadlines could also be used to strike down early voting and absentee ballots. Conservative Justices John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett also expressed concerns about the limits of early voting.“The people who should decide this issue are not the courts, but Congress, the states and Congress.”“Confidence in election outcomes can be seriously undermined if the apparent outcome of the election ... on the day after the polls close is radically flipped by the acceptance later of a big stash of ballots that flip the election.”Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@newsweek.com., ours is different: The Courageous Center—it's not"both sides," it's sharp, challenging and alive with ideas. We follow facts, not factions. If that sounds like the kind of journalism you want to see thrive, we need you., you support a mission to keep the center strong and vibrant. Members enjoy: Ad-free browsing, exclusive content and editor conversations.Opinion
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
As Supreme Court hears mail ballot case, alarms are raised in far-flung AlaskaVoting rights advocates in Alaska are worried that a case set to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court could end a long-standing practice of the state accepting ballots after election day.
Read more »
Supreme Court hears Mississippi case on late-arriving mail ballotsThe Supreme Court is taking up a case from Mississippi over whether states can count late-arriving mail ballots, a target of President Donald Trump. The outcome of the case being argued Monday could affect voters in 14 states and the District of Columbia, which have grace periods for ballots cast by mail.
Read more »
Supreme Court will debate meaning of ‘Election Day’ in late mail ballots caseThe Supreme Court's case on late arriving mail ballots comes down to what 'Election Day' means: when a vote is cast or when it's received.
Read more »
Supreme Court reverses lower court on qualified immunity for Vermont police sergeant who arrested protesterFox News Channel offers its audiences in-depth news reporting, along with opinion and analysis encompassing the principles of free people, free markets and diversity of thought, as an alternative to the left-of-center offerings of the news marketplace.
Read more »
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Journalist's Wrongful Arrest Case, Citing Appeals Court RulingThe Supreme Court declined to intervene in the case of journalist Priscilla Villarreal, known as La Gordiloca, who claimed wrongful arrest related to obtaining nonpublic information from police. The court upheld a lower court's decision granting officials immunity, despite a dissenting opinion from Justice Sotomayor and concerns about First Amendment violations. The court also declined to hear a similar case involving a former local official, raising concerns about the protection of free speech and press freedom.
Read more »
Ketanji Brown Jackson accuses RNC of wanting Supreme Court to do Congress’s job on mail ballot lawsJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson accused the RNC of asking to the justices to override late mail ballot laws, instead of Congress doing its job.
Read more »