A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a policy limiting news reporters’ access to the Pentagon, ruling that key portions of the new rules are unlawful.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks to members of the media during a press briefing at the Pentagon in Washington, Thursday, March 19, 2026. FILE - The Pentagon and the surrounding area is seen in this aerial view in Washington, Jan.
26, 2020. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks to members of the media during a press briefing at the Pentagon in Washington, Thursday, March 19, 2026. to block the Trump administration from enforcing a policy limiting news reporters’ access to the Pentagon, agreeing with The New York Times that key portions of the new rules are unlawful. U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, D.C., sided with the newspaper and ruled that the Pentagon policy illegally restricts the press credentials of reporters whoand Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in December, claiming the credentialing policy violates the journalists’ constitutional rights to free speech and due process. The current Pentagon press corps is comprised mostly of conservative outlets that agreed to the policy. Reporters from outlets that refused to consent to the new rules, including from The Associated Press, haveFriedman, who was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Bill Clinton, said the policy “fails to provide fair notice of what routine, lawful journalistic practices will result in the denial, suspension, or revocation” of Pentagon press credentials. He ruled that it violates the First and Fifth amendment rights to free speech and due process. “Those who drafted the First Amendment believed that the nation’s security requires a free press and an informed people and that such security is endangered by governmental suppression of political speech. That principle has preserved the nation’s security for almost 250 years. It must not be abandoned now,” the judge wrote. Times attorney Theodore Boutrous said in a statement that the court ruling is “a powerful rejection of the Pentagon’s effort to impede freedom of the press and the reporting of vital information to the American people during a time of war."It has argued that the policy imposes “common sense” rules that protect the military from the disclosure of national security information. “The goal of that process is to prevent those who pose a security risk from having broad access to American military headquarters,”Times attorneys claim the policy is designed to silence unfavorable press coverage of President Donald Trump’s administration. “The First Amendment flatly prohibits the government from granting itself the unbridled power to restrict speech because the mere existence of such arbitrary authority can lead to self-censorship,”The judge said he recognizes that “national security must be protected, the security of our troops must be protected, and war plans must be protected.” “But especially in light of the country’s recent incursion into Venezuela and its ongoing war with Iran, it is more important than ever that the public have access to information from a variety of perspectives about what its government is doing — so that the public can support government policies, if it wants to support them; protest, if it wants to protest; and decide based on full, complete, and open information who they are going to vote for in the next election,” Friedman wrote. Friedman said the “undisputed evidence” shows that the policy is designed to weed out “disfavored journalists" and replace them with those who are “on board and willing to serve” the government, a clear instance of illegal viewpoint discrimination. “In sum, the Policy on its face makes any newsgathering and reporting not blessed by the Department a potential basis for the denial, suspension, or revocation of a journalist’s ,” he wrote. “It provides no way for journalists to know how they may do their jobs without losing their credentials.”The judgeto reinstate the press credentials of seven Times journalists. But he said his decision to vacate the challenged policy terms applies to “all regulated parties.” Friedman gave the Pentagon a week to file a written report on its compliance with the order.Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.Man killed in Ponte Vedra double shooting remembered as ‘life of the party’Father says his daughter was detained at Blue Cypress Park teen takeoverInside new family-focused venue The Block Jax on city's SouthsideThe first day of spring is here! Michelle gives a look at the temperatures into the weekendIran internet blackout leaves Jacksonville families anxiously waiting for word from loved onesUnredacted arrest warrant reveals new details about double shooting in Ponte VedraDaughter of Ponte Vedra double shooting victim urges harsh punishment for accused killer1:10Residents say it doesn’t prevent accidents after deadly Atlantic Blvd. crashI need a drop top office! A spring fling then it feels like summerSend News4JAX your videos and pictures if you were at the teen takeover at Blue Cypress ParkSend News4JAX your videos and pictures if you were at the teen takeover at Blue Cypress ParkWhat police want parents to know about 'teen takeovers' after Arlington gathering ends in arrestsJacksonville edges toward $4 a gallon; Here's how you can saveJacksonville city councilman pushing to roll out Waymo; Safety analysts have some concernsCity of St. Augustine introduces resolution that would permanently shorten Nights of Lights▶Mother of 18-year-old killed at Westside Burger King serves customers, pays for meals in son’s honorGator boys headed to Tampa to begin journey for back-to-back national titlesJacksonville approves next step in bringing UF campus to cityPrivate lender says she lost nearly $70K after working with BG Ventures Investment Real EstatePulse nightclub demolished as Orlando moves toward permanent memorial for 49 victims of massacreGoFundMe launched after car crash sends Jacksonville family of 4 to multiple hospitalsBehind-the-scenes look at bomb squad training at Camp BlandingJacksonville NAACP urges delay in JEA appointment amid investigationsCity Council holds first JEA Special Committee meeting over potential unpaid capacity feesAfter three years, still no arrests made in Jacksonville Beach St. Patrick’s Day shootings
Washington News Pete Hegseth Donald Trump Paul Ben-Victor Entertainment
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
New York City Council employee detained by ICE must be deported, federal judge rulesA New York City Council employee who was detained by ICE more than two months ago must be deported, a federal judge says.
Read more »
Pentagon policy restricting reporters’ access ruled unconstitutional in case brought by New York TimesA federal judge ruled that the policy illegally restricts the press credentials of reporters who walked out of the building rather than agree to the Pentagon’s new rules.
Read more »
Judge sides with NYT against policy limiting reporters’ Pentagon accessA federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a policy limiting news reporters’ access to the Pentagon, ruling that key portions of the new rules are unlawful. U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, D.C.
Read more »
Pentagon policy limiting independent press access is unlawful, judge rulesThe ruling voids several provisions of the new policy that enabled the Pentagon to suspend or revoke credentials based on reporting.
Read more »
Pentagon policy limiting independent press access is unlawful, judge rulesThe ruling voids several provisions of the new policy that enabled the Pentagon to suspend or revoke credentials based on reporting.
Read more »
Judge sides with New York Times in challenge to policy limiting reporters’ access to PentagonA federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a policy limiting news reporters’ access to the Pentagon, ruling that key portions of the new rules are unlawful.
Read more »