Federal prosecutors working on the Donald Trump Mar-a-Lago documents case are trying to convince Judge Aileen Cannon by pointing to cases she worked on at the DOJ.
Federal prosecutors working on the Donald Trump Mar-a-Lago documents case are trying to convince Judge Aileen Cannon by pointing to cases she worked on at the DOJ.—a filing that seeks to block Trump’s latest ploy to morph this criminal case into some kind of wild goose chase against the Biden administration.
Although the Trump team has already received 1.3 million pages of evidence, the former president’s defense lawyers are trying to bolster their client’s conspiracy-laden claims that this investigation is just a White House-led “selective prosecution.” In search of “political bias,” they’ve asked Cannon to force the DOJ to turn over all kinds of documents—under the guise of so-called “Brady rules,” which require the government to disclose exculpatory information to a person charged with a crime.involving a 2015 sting operation that caught two men who planned to rob a fake stash house of half a million dollars of cocaine, showing up with two AK-47s in their pickup truck. One of them appealed his conviction by claiming he was subject to an unfair “selective prosecution” on the grounds that the vast majority of stash house stings nab Blacks and Hispanics. Cannon had already been elevated to the bench when her old team won the case in 2021, with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals pointing to long-established precedent that sets a “demanding burden” to make that kind of claim—particularly when trying to set off a document search for imaginary proof. By coincidence, the case actually bore Cannon’s name. One of the men caught in the sting was named Lance Cannon, andhave reminded Judge Cannon that her hard-won victory is the very reason she should rule against the former president. Defendants can’t just demand a government document dump by pointing to some flimsy notion of “selective prosecution,” the DOJ argued. “A request to discover such material is, instead, ‘governed by well-settled and binding precedent in and ” prosecutors wrote in February, citing the case she worked on by name. "It’s smart lawyering," said Robert A. Sanders, a retired Navy JAG captain who now teaches law at the University of New Haven.“She worked on almost no cases. She had very little courtroom experience. To find a case that actually she worked on and that resulted in a published opinion is in itself improbable,” said Catherine Ross, a professor emeritus at George Washington University Law School. “It’s a brilliant maneuver, and particularly with a judge who had so little trial background,” she said. Citing past cases is part of a lawyer’s everyday job. When they point to higher court rulings, attorneys do it to explain how the current interpretation of the law guides judges to make certain decisions. Occasionally, lawyers get the opportunity to point to a judge’s own past rulings—a sort of gentle nudge that reminds judges to remain consistent.The decision to point Cannon to her own case also sends a message—and not one meant for Trump’s lawyers or even the American public paying close attention to the historic case. Smith’s choice to cite case law that Cannon actually worked could be viewed as a reminder to the judge that she knows better than to side with Trump on this—especially on such a narrow topic as bias-alleging document requests. “It’s not quite the same as confronting a judge with an opinion they wrote or joined,” Ross said. “I don’t think selective prosecution comes up often. There are very few people who can pass the laugh test on claiming that. I think they have her locked in a pretty tight spot—if she were a normal judge.”Then again, prosecutors are contending with a judge who has gone out of her way to block, slow down, and frustrate the criminal case against Trump. Long before he was caught hoarding a vast collection of classified documents that he took home with him from the White House, Trump singled out Cannon as his preferred federal judge in South Florida. When Trump filed hisat a satellite courthouse where Cannon is the only judge, he was disappointed that another judge landed the case. about Trump’s privacy that in reality stemmed from a doctor’s note Trump had previously made public as part of a publicity stunt.that she relented. But since then, Cannon has consistently delayed a court review of classified records that would have only taken two days, causing a domino effect that hasSanders said the prosecutors’ citation of a case Cannon worked on could be read as a subtle reminder to the judge herself. “The message is: Remember what you did earlier? And how you got jammed up for it—when you went in a direction no one in the world thought was right? Think about what you’re going to do this time,” Sanders said. But if that’s the message, Cannon may not be getting it. In her latest move on Thursday, Cannon initially rejected prosecutors’ request to keep secret the identity of government witnesses—only to reverse herself and temporarily halt the measure the next day, after the DOJ special counsel warned about the threat of intimidation. The judge has yet to rule on the Trump team’s request to greenlight its government dumpster dive, but Trump referenced the issue in a Thursday afternoon post on his Truth Social media network.and his Thugs should immediately drop the totally discredited Documents Hoax against me. A TWO-TIERED SYSTEM OF JUSTICE AND SELECTIVE PROSECUTION!” he
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal Judge Postpones Trump's Trial on Election Plot ChargesA federal judge in Washington formally postponed Donald Trump's March trial on charges of plotting to overturn the 2020 election as a key legal appeal from the former president remains unresolved in the courts.
Read more »
Judge Demands Trump Explain His Accountant Allen Weisselberg's Apparent LiesTrump accountant Allen Weisselberg is apparently working out a deal addressing lies he told on the stand in the New York bank fraud trial. Now Trump is in even more trouble.
Read more »
‘Historic, landmark decision’: Judge Michael Luttig reacts to Trump immunity rulingThis is additional taxonomy that helps us with analytics
Read more »
Judge rejects request for hold on challenge to Donald Trump’s place on Illinois primary ballotA Cook County judge rejected a request to put a hold on a legal challenge to former President Donald Trump’s place on the Illinois’ March 19 Republican primary ballot.
Read more »
Judge criticizes Trump’s midtrial mistrial request in Carroll defamation case“The motion made no sense,” Judge Lewis A. Kaplan wrote.
Read more »
'Putting her on notice': Jack Smith losing patience with Judge Cannon in Trump documents caseThis is additional taxonomy that helps us with analytics
Read more »