AI is not all hype, but are things really as bad as predicted? Here are some reasons for keeping our AI anxiety in check and riding out the storm.
Have you ever had the experience of wading in the ocean and seeing a huge, incoming wave that makes you want to run for the shore? You generally have two options: make a break for it or duck dive under the wave to avoid the worst of its turbulence.
But sometimes, something unexpected happens: That huge wave dies down to almost nothing by the time it reaches you. Could something like this happen withWe've all been hearing the dire predictions for a couple of years now: AI will replace humans in several industries like customer service, finance, law, and, as well as in real estate and sales in general. Students and industry professionals alike won't need to know how to write or even think, since GPTs will happily do it for them. If most of us are replaced by AI and no longer need to work, what will we do? Will be assured a universal basic income so we can survive?like an ongoing tornado siren from the edge of town. The idea that humans willingly replaced themselves with their technology might give future generations pause. Or maybe not---if those future generations are AI.Some people are indeed doing so, but burying our heads in the sand doesn't seem like a promising move. If you genuinely live an off-grid life, you might be okay duck diving the AI wave. But for educators, academics, and many industry professionals, it's almost a given that we need to try to understand how new technologies are impacting human flourishing. AI, at least in some form, is part of our inevitable human-technology co-evolution. It's been coming for a long, long time. The history of computers and information science bears this out, as does almost every sci-fi novel ever written.In the late 1990s, we were terrified of Y2K and thought the world might end. It didn't. In the early 2000s, we were terrified of nanotechnology and worried about the"grey goo" scenario wherein nanobots over-replicated and overtook the earth. The scenario didn't come to pass, and we don't even hear that much about nanotechnology anymore . I think we're in a similar mindset now, fearing that AI will take over the world and make humanity obsolete, or at least unnecessary. But there are a few good reasons to question the assumption.People are becoming disenchanted with generative AI systems like ChatGPT. Its obsequious nature is commonly joked about. Many have argued that AI models are actually getting dumber rather than smarter as designers try to make them safer and more concise. Computer science students report that GPT-produced code is buggy and their performance on challenging math problems is less than impressive. I'll admit that ChatGPT is pretty good at writing, but it's still not human writing.We're not even sure for how long systems like ChatGPT are sustainable. They're a tremendous drain on natural resources like power and water, and the word on the street is that Open AI is billions in the hole from funding its startup that's already getting old in the public eye.There seems to be a growing social trend toward simpler, lower-tech and less tech in which people prefer books to ebooks, flip phones to smartphones, and real conversations todrivel. We've all been made painfully aware of the addictive nature of our gadgets and Big Tech's insidious rendering of the gadgets into conduits for sucking our time, There's a vast continuum between AI-enhanced humanity and AI replacing humanity. The wave isn't looming over us, it's already here, and we're so far managing to keep our heads above water., is a writer and philosopher who teaches writing at the University of Colorado Boulder. She enjoys writing about all the facets of human nature—the light, the dark, and the shades of grey in between.Self Tests are all about you. Are you outgoing or introverted? Are you a narcissist? Does perfectionism hold you back? Find out the answers to these questions and more with Psychology Today.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Human Rights Watch accuses Israel of using white phosphorus in LebanonHuman Rights Watch says the Israeli military unlawfully fired white phosphorus shells into a village in southern Lebanon. The group says it has verified seven images and geolocated them to the village of Yohmor. It says the shells hit residential areas hours after Israel warned residents there, and in dozens of nearby places, to evacuate.
Read more »
Human Rights Watch accuses Israel of using white phosphorus in southern Lebanese townHuman Rights Watch says the Israeli military unlawfully fired white phosphorus shells into a village in southern Lebanon.
Read more »
Chimps' taste for fermented fruit hints at origins of human love of alcoholScientists analyzed the urine of wild chimpanzees who'd feasted on fallen fruit to see how much alcohol they consumed from the fermented sugars.
Read more »
For most of human history, bed-sharing was about economics, and not about love.Older couples who sleep apart while maintaining nightly rituals often report that the separation actually sharpens their appreciation for those special intimate moments.
Read more »
Human Rights Watch: Israel Used White Phosphorus in Lebanon Residential AreasHuman Rights Watch reports Israel used white phosphorus in a residential area of southern Lebanon, potentially violating international law. The group is investigating if any residents were harmed. The Israeli military released a video of an attack on an alleged Iranian bunker. Concerns are raised about the use of white phosphorus due to its potential to cause severe burns and long-term health issues.
Read more »
Israel Illegally Using White Phosphorus Against Civilians in Lebanon: Human Rights WatchStephen Prager is a staff writer for Common Dreams.
Read more »