Beyond the Breaking News

Iran Says It Shot Down US Reaper Drone After Trump Admin Launched New Strikes

Iran News

Iran Says It Shot Down US Reaper Drone After Trump Admin Launched New Strikes
Iran-War

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said it reserves the right to 'respond to any ceasefire violation by the aggressor US army.'

Iran Says It Shot Down US Reaper Drone After Trump Admin Launched New Strikes The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said it reserves the right to "respond to any ceasefire violation by the aggressor US army.

"launched what it characterized as "self-defense strikes" on southern Iran, further complicating efforts to secure a diplomatic resolution to the illegal US-Israeli war. , that it downed an MQ-9 Reaper drone and "fired upon an RQ-4 drone and an intruding F-35 fighter jet.

" The IRGC cast its actions as defensive and said it has the right to "respond to any ceasefire violation by the aggressor US army. "that the American military "conducted self-defense strikes in southern Iran today to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces. " The strikes, according to CENTCOM, targetedthat the Iranian side provided "a different—and more detailed—account of what happened," saying the "exchange unfolded in several rounds over roughly 24 hours.

" "It reportedly began when US forces attacked two IRGC naval boats, killing four Iranian military personnel," Azizi said, citing Iranian sources. "Iran responded with anti-ship missiles targeting US vessels. Iranian air defense systems then shot down at least one—some reports say three—US drones operating in the area. The US subsequently struck Iranian anti-ship missile launch sites and air defense systems.

Iran responded again, firing multiple anti-ship missiles at U.S. vessels in the Arabian Sea. Independent verification of these claims—including the casualty figures and the extent of damage on both sides—remains limited. The competing narratives follow the familiar pattern in which each side frames its actions as a response to the other’s aggression. The more significant point is that the exchange has now moved through multiple rounds of attack and counter-attack within a single 24-hour period.

That pattern is harder to contain than a single incident. It also raises the question of how this cycle interacts with the indirect negotiations currently underway.against Trump's claim of an imminent peace deal, though a spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry told reporters on Monday that "it is correct to say that we have reached a conclusion on a large portion of the issues under discussion.

"Monday that "the two sides are working toward a memorandum of understanding that would end the fighting and lift constraints on shipping traffic in the Strait of Hormuz over 30 days while setting the stage for talks about Iran’s nuclear program in a second phase. "would depend on progress, a senior U.S. administration official said Sunday," the Journal added.

"The US is seeking clearer commitments from Iran about its nuclear program up front, while Iranian negotiators are pressing for details from the US about relief from sanctions and asset freezes, mediators said. "to be brought home and destroyed or, preferably, in conjunction and coordination with the Islamic Republic of Iran, destroyed in place or, at another acceptable location, with the Atomic Energy Commission, or its equivalent, being witness to this process and event.

"Samir Puri, a visiting lecturer in war studies at Kings College London, told Al Jazeera that the new US strikes on Iran create an “extremely precarious situation" for negotiators. “Fighting and talking at the same time is quite a common thing in a negotiation at the end of a conflict that has been very intense and hasn’t been resolved,” said Puri.

"The key... is to keep talking and to not allow the talks to collapse by these escalations—because these may not be the last escalations. “What we don’t know is whether this is the storm before the calm or the calm before the storm,” he continued. "We don’t know whether these negotiations need to be sustained and to absorb these sorts of escalations for days, for weeks, for months. It could be a very long negotiation process still to come.

" It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements.

No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform.

To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed.

When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going.

At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay.

Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we.launched what it characterized as "self-defense strikes" on southern Iran, further complicating efforts to secure a diplomatic resolution to the illegal US-Israeli war. , that it downed an MQ-9 Reaper drone and "fired upon an RQ-4 drone and an intruding F-35 fighter jet.

" The IRGC cast its actions as defensive and said it has the right to "respond to any ceasefire violation by the aggressor US army. "that the American military "conducted self-defense strikes in southern Iran today to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces. " The strikes, according to CENTCOM, targetedthat the Iranian side provided "a different—and more detailed—account of what happened," saying the "exchange unfolded in several rounds over roughly 24 hours.

" "It reportedly began when US forces attacked two IRGC naval boats, killing four Iranian military personnel," Azizi said, citing Iranian sources. "Iran responded with anti-ship missiles targeting US vessels. Iranian air defense systems then shot down at least one—some reports say three—US drones operating in the area. The US subsequently struck Iranian anti-ship missile launch sites and air defense systems.

Iran responded again, firing multiple anti-ship missiles at U.S. vessels in the Arabian Sea. Independent verification of these claims—including the casualty figures and the extent of damage on both sides—remains limited. The competing narratives follow the familiar pattern in which each side frames its actions as a response to the other’s aggression. The more significant point is that the exchange has now moved through multiple rounds of attack and counter-attack within a single 24-hour period.

That pattern is harder to contain than a single incident. It also raises the question of how this cycle interacts with the indirect negotiations currently underway.against Trump's claim of an imminent peace deal, though a spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry told reporters on Monday that "it is correct to say that we have reached a conclusion on a large portion of the issues under discussion.

"Monday that "the two sides are working toward a memorandum of understanding that would end the fighting and lift constraints on shipping traffic in the Strait of Hormuz over 30 days while setting the stage for talks about Iran’s nuclear program in a second phase. "would depend on progress, a senior U.S. administration official said Sunday," the Journal added.

"The US is seeking clearer commitments from Iran about its nuclear program up front, while Iranian negotiators are pressing for details from the US about relief from sanctions and asset freezes, mediators said. "to be brought home and destroyed or, preferably, in conjunction and coordination with the Islamic Republic of Iran, destroyed in place or, at another acceptable location, with the Atomic Energy Commission, or its equivalent, being witness to this process and event.

"Samir Puri, a visiting lecturer in war studies at Kings College London, told Al Jazeera that the new US strikes on Iran create an “extremely precarious situation" for negotiators. “Fighting and talking at the same time is quite a common thing in a negotiation at the end of a conflict that has been very intense and hasn’t been resolved,” said Puri.

"The key... is to keep talking and to not allow the talks to collapse by these escalations—because these may not be the last escalations. “What we don’t know is whether this is the storm before the calm or the calm before the storm,” he continued. "We don’t know whether these negotiations need to be sustained and to absorb these sorts of escalations for days, for weeks, for months. It could be a very long negotiation process still to come.

"launched what it characterized as "self-defense strikes" on southern Iran, further complicating efforts to secure a diplomatic resolution to the illegal US-Israeli war. , that it downed an MQ-9 Reaper drone and "fired upon an RQ-4 drone and an intruding F-35 fighter jet.

" The IRGC cast its actions as defensive and said it has the right to "respond to any ceasefire violation by the aggressor US army. "that the American military "conducted self-defense strikes in southern Iran today to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces. " The strikes, according to CENTCOM, targetedthat the Iranian side provided "a different—and more detailed—account of what happened," saying the "exchange unfolded in several rounds over roughly 24 hours.

" "It reportedly began when US forces attacked two IRGC naval boats, killing four Iranian military personnel," Azizi said, citing Iranian sources. "Iran responded with anti-ship missiles targeting US vessels. Iranian air defense systems then shot down at least one—some reports say three—US drones operating in the area. The US subsequently struck Iranian anti-ship missile launch sites and air defense systems.

Iran responded again, firing multiple anti-ship missiles at U.S. vessels in the Arabian Sea. Independent verification of these claims—including the casualty figures and the extent of damage on both sides—remains limited. The competing narratives follow the familiar pattern in which each side frames its actions as a response to the other’s aggression. The more significant point is that the exchange has now moved through multiple rounds of attack and counter-attack within a single 24-hour period.

That pattern is harder to contain than a single incident. It also raises the question of how this cycle interacts with the indirect negotiations currently underway.against Trump's claim of an imminent peace deal, though a spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry told reporters on Monday that "it is correct to say that we have reached a conclusion on a large portion of the issues under discussion.

"Monday that "the two sides are working toward a memorandum of understanding that would end the fighting and lift constraints on shipping traffic in the Strait of Hormuz over 30 days while setting the stage for talks about Iran’s nuclear program in a second phase. "would depend on progress, a senior U.S. administration official said Sunday," the Journal added.

"The US is seeking clearer commitments from Iran about its nuclear program up front, while Iranian negotiators are pressing for details from the US about relief from sanctions and asset freezes, mediators said. "to be brought home and destroyed or, preferably, in conjunction and coordination with the Islamic Republic of Iran, destroyed in place or, at another acceptable location, with the Atomic Energy Commission, or its equivalent, being witness to this process and event.

"Samir Puri, a visiting lecturer in war studies at Kings College London, told Al Jazeera that the new US strikes on Iran create an “extremely precarious situation" for negotiators. “Fighting and talking at the same time is quite a common thing in a negotiation at the end of a conflict that has been very intense and hasn’t been resolved,” said Puri.

"The key... is to keep talking and to not allow the talks to collapse by these escalations—because these may not be the last escalations. “What we don’t know is whether this is the storm before the calm or the calm before the storm,” he continued. "We don’t know whether these negotiations need to be sustained and to absorb these sorts of escalations for days, for weeks, for months. It could be a very long negotiation process still to come.

" The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%.

Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.

Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising.

No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in?

GooglePlease follow us on Google to support us
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

commondreams /  🏆 530. in US

Iran-War

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Iran latest: Peace deal would reopen Strait of Hormuz, stop Iran from building nuclear weaponIran latest: Peace deal would reopen Strait of Hormuz, stop Iran from building nuclear weaponSecretary of State Marco Rubio cautioned Sunday that “significant progress, although not final progress has been made' in the negotiations to end the war in Iran.
Read more »

Iran live updates: Trump says Iran deal critics 'know nothing' of potential agreementIran live updates: Trump says Iran deal critics 'know nothing' of potential agreementPresident Donald Trump said Saturday that a framework for a peace deal with Iran will be announced shortly and it will include opening the Strait of Hormuz.
Read more »

Iran live updates: Trump says Iran deal critics 'know nothing' of potential agreementIran live updates: Trump says Iran deal critics 'know nothing' of potential agreementPresident Donald Trump said Saturday that a framework for a peace deal with Iran will be announced shortly and it will include opening the Strait of Hormuz.
Read more »

Iran live updates: US forces conduct 'self-defense' strikes in Iran, CENTCOM saysIran live updates: US forces conduct 'self-defense' strikes in Iran, CENTCOM saysPresident Donald Trump said Saturday that a framework for a peace deal with Iran will be announced shortly and it will include opening the Strait of Hormuz.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-08-09 22:23:24