Indictment Against Journalist Don Lemon Likely to be Dismissed Due to Constitutional Flaws

Legal News

Indictment Against Journalist Don Lemon Likely to be Dismissed Due to Constitutional Flaws
Don LemonFACE ActFirst Amendment
  • 📰 cbschicago
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 206 sec. here
  • 10 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 103%
  • Publisher: 51%

Legal experts anticipate the dismissal of the indictment against Don Lemon and others involved in a church protest due to constitutional issues with the charges related to the FACE Act.

Legal experts predict the indictment against journalist Don Lemon and eight others, stemming from their involvement in an anti-ICE protest at a church, will likely be dismissed. The case hinges on a charge considered constitutionally flawed, so much so that the Justice Department 's Civil Rights Division has never before used it to prosecute interference in a house of worship.

The indictment, filed on January 29th, alleges that the defendants violated the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, or FACE Act, by intimidating or interfering with individuals exercising their religious freedom at the Cities Church in St. Paul. The indictment also includes a felony charge of conspiring to interfere with individuals' religious rights. Arraignment is scheduled for Friday. Concerns center on a specific section of the FACE Act that criminalizes interference at houses of worship. Former Civil Rights Division lawyers argue this section misinterprets First Amendment rights, which primarily protect religious freedom from government interference, not private individuals. The FACE Act, enacted in 1994, was originally designed to address threats and intimidation faced by women at reproductive health clinics, and the Justice Department has only used it in cases involving access to medical care at such clinics. This is due to courts finding that interfering with access to reproductive health clinics impacts interstate commerce. The legal community believes that these constitutional problems are a significant factor in the lack of previous FACE Act prosecutions in religious freedom cases and are a primary reason for the expected dismissal. The case is further complicated by a series of red flags that former Justice Department officials believe could lead to a quick dismissal of charges. The former Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, Kristen Clarke, stated her belief that this use of the FACE Act is illegitimate, wholly outside the original purpose of the law, and that the cases will likely be dismissed soon. A Justice Department spokesperson did not provide comment regarding the decision to use the FACE Act in this case. From the very beginning, the case has been plagued by problems, including a lack of probable cause and the apparent hesitancy of career prosecutors to proceed with the charges. The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, in its attempt to charge Lemon, journalist Georgia Fort, Lemon's driver, and local activists who attended the protest, immediately encountered resistance from various legal bodies. Lemon’s attorney has previously stated that his client was present at the protest in his capacity as a journalist and therefore protected by the First Amendment. The affidavit in support of the complaint was filed by an ICE agent with limited experience, whereas such affidavits are usually filed by FBI agents, who typically handle criminal civil rights violation investigations. Magistrate Judge Doug Micko rejected arrest warrants for Lemon and four others based on the FACE Act misdemeanor charge and a related felony civil rights charge alleging conspiracy to violate the churchgoers' rights. He also rejected the FACE Act charge for other defendants, including prominent local activists Nekima Levy Armstrong and Chauntyll Allen, citing 'no probable cause' in his reasoning. Levy Armstrong's attorney, Jordan Kushner, stated that the prosecution violates First Amendment rights. The Justice Department's subsequent request for the chief judge to review Micko's decision met with delays, leading them to appeal to a federal appellate court, which declined to intervene. Minnesota Chief U.S. District Judge Patrick Schiltz criticized the strength of the evidence against the journalists, noting the absence of evidence suggesting criminal behavior or conspiracy. Adding to the case's complexity, career prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Minnesota also declined to participate, due to concerns about the lack of evidence supporting a federal crime. Despite these objections and the concerns raised by multiple legal officials, the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division proceeded with the indictment against Lemon, Fort, and other co-defendants, alleging violations of the FACE Act and conspiracy to interfere with religious rights. The indictment names only politically appointed Justice Department lawyers within the Civil Rights Division, further contributing to the controversy surrounding the case

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

cbschicago /  🏆 546. in US

Don Lemon FACE Act First Amendment Justice Department Freedom Of Access To Clinic Entrances Act

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Don Lemon codefendant seeks to toss FACE Act indictment in church storming caseDon Lemon codefendant seeks to toss FACE Act indictment in church storming caseA codefendant charged with Don Lemon sought dismissal of FACE Act charges tied to an anti-ICE protest inside a Minnesota church.
Read more »

Former federal prosecutor who quit now representing Don LemonFormer federal prosecutor who quit now representing Don LemonFormer CNN host Don Lemon has hired former federal prosecutor Joe Thompson for his legal defense. Lemon is one of nine people indicted for their alleged roles in disrupting a church service in Minnesota. Thompson, who recently resigned amid disputes with the Trump administration, had been leading major fraud investigations in Minnesota.
Read more »

Former federal prosecutor who quit amid Trump administration dispute now representing Don Lemon -Former federal prosecutor who quit amid Trump administration dispute now representing Don Lemon -MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A former federal prosecutor who quit amid a dispute with the Trump administration is now representing former CNN host Don Lemon, who was
Read more »

Former federal prosecutor who quit amid Trump administration dispute now representing Don LemonFormer federal prosecutor who quit amid Trump administration dispute now representing Don LemonJoe Thompson recently formed a law firm with Harry Jacobs, another former prosecutor who quit.
Read more »

Don Lemon hires former MN prosecutor Joe Thompson to help fight church protest chargesDon Lemon hires former MN prosecutor Joe Thompson to help fight church protest chargesFormer U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson, who recently resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s Office of Minnesota following the fatal shooting of Renee Good, has ben hired to represent Don Lemon against charges stemming from a protest at a St. Paul church.
Read more »

Don Lemon hires ex-prosecutor who resigned from Justice Department to represent himDon Lemon hires ex-prosecutor who resigned from Justice Department to represent himA high-profile former prosecutor who was part of a wave of resignations from the Justice Department's office in Minneapolis last month has a surprising new client: Former CNN anchor Don Lemon.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-04-01 05:23:03